Effect of a novel endoscope cleaning brush on duodenoscope contamination

Abstract

Background Current duodenoscope reprocessing protocols are insufficient to prevent contamination and require adaptations to prevent endoscopy-associated infections (EAIs). This study aimed to investigate the effect of a new endoscope cleaning brush on the contamination rate of ready-to-use duodenoscopes.

Methods This retrospective before-and-after intervention study collected duodenoscope surveillance culture results from March 2018 to June 2022. Contamination was defined as ≥1 colony-forming unit of a microorganism of gut or oral origin (MGO). In December 2020, an endoscope cleaning brush with a sweeper design was introduced as an intervention in the manual cleaning of duodenoscopes. A logistic mixed-effects model was used to study the effects of this intervention.

Results Data were collected from 176 culture sets before the new brush’s introduction and 81 culture sets afterwards. Pre-introduction, culture sets positive with an MGO comprised 45.5% (95%CI 38.3%–52.8%; 80/176), decreasing to 17.3% (95%CI 10.6%–26.9%; 14/81) after implementation of the new brush. Compared with the former brush, duodenoscopes cleaned with the new brush had lower odds of contamination with MGOs (adjusted odds ratio 0.25, 95%CI 0.11–0.58; P=0.001)

Conclusions Use of the new brush in manual cleaning reduced contamination with MGOs and is expected to prevent EAIs. These findings should be confirmed in future prospective randomized studies.

• References

• 1 Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G. et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 1781-1788
• 2 Hutfless S, Shiratori Y, Chu D. et al. Risk factors for infections after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a retrospective cohort analysis of US Medicare Fee-For-Service claims, 2015–2021. BMJ Open 2022; 12: e065077
• 3 Balan GG, Sfarti CV, Chiriac SA. et al. Duodenoscope-associated infections: a review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 38: 2205-2213
• 4 Larsen S, Russell RV, Ockert LK. et al. Rate and impact of duodenoscope contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2020; 25: 100451
• 5 Alfa MJ, Singh H. Impact of wet storage and other factors on biofilm formation and contamination of patient-ready endoscopes: a narrative review. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91: 236-247
• 6 Alfa M, Olson N, DeGagne P. et al. 270. Prevention of biofilm accumulation in duodenoscopes varies with the method of reprocessing. Gastrointest Endosc 2017; 85: AB67-AB68
• 7 Bridier A, Sanchez-Vizuete Mdel P, Le Coq D. et al. Biofilms of a Bacillus subtilis hospital isolate protect Staphylococcus aureus from biocide action. PLoS One 2012; 7: e44506
• 8 da Costa Luciano C, Olson N, DeGagne P. et al. A new buildup biofilm model that mimics accumulation of material in flexible endoscope channels. J Microbiol Methods 2016; 127: 224-229
• 9 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Society for Microbiology (ASM). Duodenoscope Surveillance Sampling-and Culturing Protocols. 2018 Zugriff am 02. September 2023 unter: https://www.fda.gov/media/111081/download
• 10 Colman S, Vanzieleghem T, Leroux-Roels I. In vitro comparison of 3 different brushes for manual cleaning of endoscopes. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022; 43: 1076-1078
• 11 Nederlandse Vereniging voor Medische Microbiologie. Richtlijn controle op microbiologische veiligheid van thermolabiele flexibele hoog-risico gastrointestinale endoscopen [Dutch]. 2018 Zugriff am 03. September 2023 unter: https://www.vdsmh.nl/publicaties/flexibele-endoscopen/richtlijn-controle-op-microbiologische-veiligheid-van-thermolabiele-flexibele-hoog-risico-gastro-intestinale-endoscopen
• 12 Rauwers AW, Voor in 't Holt AF, Buijs JG. et al. High prevalence rate of digestive tract bacteria in duodenoscopes: A nationwide study. Gut 2018; 67: 1637-1645
• 13 Rauwers AW, Voor in ’t Holt AF, Buijs JG. et al. Nationwide risk analysis of duodenoscope and linear echoendoscope contamination. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 681-691.e681
• 14 R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (2022). R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Zugriff am 06. September 2023 unter: https://www.r-project.org
• 15 Rizopoulos D. GLMMadaptive: Generalized Linear Mixed Models using Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature. R package version 0.8–5. Zugriff am 06. September 2023 unter: https://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=GLMMadaptive
• 16 Kwakman JA, Erler NS, Vos MC. et al. Risk evaluation of duodenoscope-associated infections in the Netherlands calls for a heightened awareness of device-related infections: A systematic review. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 148-155
• 17 Ofstead CL, Buro BL, Hopkins KM. et al. Duodenoscope-associated infection prevention: A call for evidence-based decision making. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E1769-E1781
• 18 Visrodia K, Petersen BT. Borescope examination: Is there value in visual assessment of endoscope channels?. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 88: 620-623
• 19 Santos LCS, Parvin F, Huizer-Pajkos A. et al. Contribution of usage to endoscope working channel damage and bacterial contamination. J Hosp Infect 2020; 105: 176-182
• 20 Schweizer ML, Braun BI, Milstone AM. Research methods in healthcare epidemiology and antimicrobial stewardship-quasi-experimental designs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37: 1135-1140