Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(02): 234-244
DOI: 10.1055/a-2201-8302
Original Article

Complications with Follicular Unit Excision

Kenneth L. Williams Jr
1   Orange County Hair Restoration, Irvine, California
,
Shady El-Maghraby
2   Maghraby Skin and Hair Clinic, Cairo, Egypt
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Hair restoration surgery (HRS) is typically a safe outpatient or office-based procedure when physicians follow high ethical standards and uphold community practice standards. Patients' clinical outcomes are mostly operator dependent, and temporary and permanent complications rarely occur. Follicular unit excision (FUE) donor harvesting, in particular, is a challenging harvesting technique requiring a long learning curve, physical stamina, higher than average hand–eye coordination and manual dexterity. The types of complications associated with FUE are comparable to linear strip excision (LSE). Similar to LSE donor harvesting, FUE complications may occur irrespective if standard precautions are followed by the physician. As in any skin and scalp procedure, injuries and poor cosmetic outcomes occur despite appropriate preoperative precautions and intraoperative technique. In increasing and greater instances, however, FUE complications are observed when the physician fails to follow hair restoration practice standards and routine surgical precautions. Physician induced, or iatrogenic complications occur more often when untrained licensed surgeons perform HRS, and who fail to meet practice standards and best practices. In the last decade, physician-influenced FUE complications, or iatrogenic cause of FUE injuries are increasingly observed which results in poor aesthetic outcomes. Higher than average FUE complication rates occur in cases involving inadequately trained physicians, as well as in cases where improper delegation of the FUE hair transplant procedure is performed by unlicensed and untrained individuals. In this chapter, we described commonly encountered HRS complications, as well as physician influenced, or iatrogenic causes of FUE complications.



Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
31 October 2023

Article published online:
10 January 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Unger R, Shapiro R. Hair Transplant. New York: Thieme; 2023: 12
  • 2 Garg AK, Garg S. Complications of hair transplant procedures-causes and management. Indian J Plast Surg 2021; 54 (04) 477-482
  • 3 Chiang YZ, Tosti A, Chaudhry IH. et al. Lichen planopilaris following hair transplantation and face-lift surgery. Br J Dermatol 2012; 166 (03) 666-370
  • 4 Donovan J. Lichen planopilaris after hair transplantation: report of 17 cases. Dermatol Surg 2012; 38 (12) 1998-2004
  • 5 Rodrigues Barata AR, Camacho-Martínez F. Alopecia areata as a complication of hair restoration surgery. Eur J Dermatol 2012; 22 (06) 813-814
  • 6 Hwang ST, Park BC. Trichorrhexis nodosa after hair transplantation: dermoscopic, pathologic and electron microscopy analyses. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39 (11) 1721-1724
  • 7 Williams Jr KL. Current practices and controversies in cosmetic hair restoration. Dermatol Surg 2013; 39 (05) 797-801
  • 8 Kuniyoshi Y. Guidelines for perioperative antithrombotic therapying hair restoration surgery: management of patients with coronary heart disease, mechanical heart valve, and atrial fibrillation. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2012; 22 (02) 59-64
  • 9 Kavic MS. Guidelines for an office-based surgical facility: quality not bureaucracy. JSLS 1998; 2 (02) 121
  • 10 Kerure AS, Patwardhan N. Complications in hair transplantation. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2018; 11 (04) 182-189
  • 11 Torp KD, Metheny E, Simon LV. Lidocaine Toxicity. (Updated December 8, 2022). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Accessed 11 December 2023 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482479/
  • 12 Ogu CC, Maxa JL. Drug interactions due to cytochrome P450. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent 2000; 13 (04) 421-423
  • 13 Crisóstomo M, Dua K, Gupta AK, Tayfun Oguzoglu, Tykocinski OA. FUE Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hair Transplant Forum Int 2019; 29 (04) 139-150
  • 14 Harris J. The development and application of the hair diameter Index (HDI). Hair Transplant Forum Int 2021; 31 (01) 1-8
  • 15 Lam-Williams. Hair Transplant 360. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: Jaypee; 2022
  • 16 Karaçal N, Uraloğlu M, Dindar T, Livaoğlu M. Necrosis of the donor site after hair restoration with follicular unit extraction (FUE): a case report. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65 (04) e87-e89
  • 17 Näslund-Koch C, Thyssen JP, Zachariae C, Nielsen SL, Skov L. Side effects after artificial hair implants: 2 case reports. JAAD Case Rep 2020; 6 (08) 740-742
  • 18 Food and Drug Administration. Proceed Listing of banned devices, prosthetic hair fibers. Code Federal Regulations 1983; 21: 895 . Accessed 11 December 2023 at: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?fr=895.101