Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e3164-e3169
DOI: 10.1055/a-2202-3830
Original Article

Utility of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator in a Low-Risk Population

Kelley M. Sonney
1   Department of Pediatrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
,
Dakota Tomasini
1   Department of Pediatrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
,
James K. Aden
1   Department of Pediatrics, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
,
Caitlin M. Drumm 
2   Department of Pediatrics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland
› Author Affiliations Funding None.
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To compare early-onset sepsis (EOS) risk estimation and recommendations for infectious evaluation and/or empiric antibiotics using a categorical risk assessment versus the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator in a low-risk population.

Study Design Retrospective chart review of late preterm (≥350/7–366/7 weeks' gestational age) and term infants born at the Brooke Army Medical Center between January 1, 2012 and August 29, 2019. We evaluated those born via cesarean section with rupture of membranes (ROM) < 10 minutes. Statistical analysis was performed to compare recommendations from a categorical risk assessment versus the calculator.

Results We identified 1,187 infants who met inclusion criteria. A blood culture was obtained within 72 hours after birth from 234 (19.7%) infants and 170 (14.3%) received antibiotics per routine clinical practice, using categorical risk assessment. Respiratory distress was the most common indication for evaluation, occurring in 173 (14.6%) of patients. After applying the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Calculator to this population, the recommendation was to obtain a blood culture on 166 (14%), to start or strongly consider starting empiric antibiotics on 164 (13.8%), and no culture or antibiotics on 1,021 (86%). Utilizing calculator recommendations would have led to a reduction in frequency of blood culture (19.7 vs. 14%, p < 0.0001) but no reduction in empiric antibiotics (14.3 vs. 13.8%, p = 0.53). There were no cases of culture-proven EOS.

Conclusion This population is low risk for development of EOS; however, 19.7% received an evaluation for infection and 14.3% received antibiotics. Utilization of the Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis Risk Calculator would have led to a significant reduction in the evaluation for EOS but no reduction in antibiotic exposure. Consideration of delivery mode and indication for delivery may be beneficial to include in risk assessments for EOS.

Key Points

  • Cesarean section with rupture of membranes at delivery confers low risk for EOS.

  • Respiratory distress often triggers an EOS evaluation.

  • Delivery mode should be considered in EOS risk.

Keywords

infections - newborn - neonatal sepsis - antimicrobial stewardship - risk assessment


Publication History

Received: 31 July 2023

Accepted: 30 October 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
01 November 2023

Article published online:
04 December 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Sánchez PJ. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (05) 817-826
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cotten CM. Adverse consequences of neonatal antibiotic exposure. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016; 28 (02) 141-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cotten CM, Taylor S, Stoll B. et al; NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2009; 123 (01) 58-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Alexander VN, Northrup V, Bizzarro MJ. Antibiotic exposure in the newborn intensive care unit and the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr 2011; 159 (03) 392-397
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hanna MH, Askenazi DJ, Selewski DT. Drug-induced acute kidney injury in neonates. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016; 28 (02) 180-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cox LM, Yamanishi S, Sohn J. et al. Altering the intestinal microbiota during a critical developmental window has lasting metabolic consequences. Cell 2014; 158 (04) 705-721
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sonney KM, Guindon MG, Aden JK, Drumm CM. Early antibiotic exposure in low-risk late preterm and term infants. Am J Perinatol 2023; 40 (11) 1240-1244
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Flannery DD, Mukhopadhyay S, Morales KH. et al. Delivery characteristics and the risk of early-onset neonatal sepsis. Pediatrics 2022; 149 (02) e2021052900
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Vidic Z, Blickstein I, Štucin Gantar I, Verdenik I, Tul N. Timing of elective cesarean section and neonatal morbidity: a population-based study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (15) 2461-2463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tita AT, Landon MB, Spong CY. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Timing of elective repeat cesarean delivery at term and neonatal outcomes. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (02) 111-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ. Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1995; 102 (02) 101-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zanardo V, Simbi AK, Franzoi M, Soldà G, Salvadori A, Trevisanuto D. Neonatal respiratory morbidity risk and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean delivery. Acta Paediatr 2004; 93 (05) 643-647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Keszler M, Carbone MT, Cox C, Schumacher RE. Severe respiratory failure after elective repeat cesarean delivery: a potentially preventable condition leading to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Pediatrics 1992; 89 (4 Pt 1): 670-672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Puopolo KM, Lynfield R, Cummings JJ. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, Committee on Infectious Diseases. Management of infants at risk for group B streptococcal disease. Pediatrics 2019; 144 (02) e20191881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Achten NB, Klingenberg C, Benitz WE. et al. Association of use of the neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator with reduction in antibiotic therapy and safety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173 (11) 1032-1040
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Verani JR, McGee L, Schrag SJ. Division of Bacterial Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease–revised guidelines from CDC, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010; 59 (RR-10): 1-36
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Achten NB, Visser DH, Tromp E, Groot W, van Goudoever JB, Plötz FB. Early onset sepsis calculator implementation is associated with reduced healthcare utilization and financial costs in late preterm and term newborns. Eur J Pediatr 2020; 179 (05) 727-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Leonardi BM, Binder M, Griswold KJ, Yalcinkaya GF, Walsh MC. Utilization of a Neonatal early-onset sepsis calculator to guide initial newborn management. Pediatr Qual Saf 2019; 4 (05) e214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mukhopadhyay S, Lieberman ES, Puopolo KM, Riley LE, Johnson LC. Effect of early-onset sepsis evaluations on in-hospital breastfeeding practices among asymptomatic term neonates. Hosp Pediatr 2015; 5 (04) 203-210
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bergman NJ. Birth practices: Maternal-neonate separation as a source of toxic stress. Birth Defects Res 2019; 111 (15) 1087-1109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pavlyshyn H, Sarapuk I, Saturska U. Maternal Stress Experience in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit after Preterm Delivery. Am J Perinatol 2022; Aug 27. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1747942.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Capin I, Hinds A, Vomero B, Roth P, Blau J. Are early-onset sepsis evaluations and empiric antibiotics mandatory for all neonates admitted with respiratory distress?. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (04) 444-448
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar