Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2024; 40(02): 245-251
DOI: 10.1055/a-2207-3413
Original Article

Ethical Considerations in Follicular Unit Excision Surgical Procedures

Paul T. Rose
1   Private Practice, Walnut Creek, California
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Follicular unit excision (FUE) is an increasingly popular hair restoration technique. In many instances, it surpasses linear strip excision (LSE) surgery in terms of number of procedures and clinics dedicated to performing FUE. The rise in popularity relates primarily to a somewhat misguided perception that FUE produces less evidence of a surgical procedure having been performed. This is based on the fact that a linear scar is avoided. The procedure is easier to learn and “less invasive” as compared to LSE harvesting and requires less staff and capital expense. The FUE procedure is aggressively marketed often as “scarless surgery.” This false statement, along with the ease of starting an FUE practice, has resulted in various ethical issues related to evaluation, methodology, and business practices. In this chapter, we discuss the ethical issues surrounding FUE hair restoration surgery and the examination of the mathematics of donor management as it relates to the ethical management of the FUE patient.

Keywords

follicular unit excision - follicular unit transplantation - ethics - unlicensed - follicular units - safe zone - linear strip excision


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
09 November 2023

Article published online:
06 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Orentreich N. Autografts in alopecias and other selected dermatological conditions. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1959; 83: 463-479
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Rassman WR, Bernstein RM, McClellan R, Jones R, Worton E, Uyttendaele H. Follicular unit extraction: minimally invasive surgery for hair transplantation. Dermatol Surg 2002; 28 (08) 720-728
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Rose PT. Evaluation, Planning and Donor Concerns with Follicular Unit Excision. In: Unger R, Shapiro R. eds. Hair Transplantation. 6th ed.,. New York, New York: Thieme; 368-375
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Council on Constitution and Bylaws, Council on Long Range Planning and Development. Definition of Surgery H-475.983. 2023
    PubMed
  • 5 Statement of Philosophy: Use of Unlicensed Healthcare Personnel. OMB Report Vol. 134, No. 3, Summer 2022.
    PubMed
  • 6 Accessed November 17, 2023 at: https://ishrs.org/ishrs-position-statement-on-qualifications-for-scalp-surgery/
    PubMed
  • 7 International Society of Hair Restoration Surgery. Consensus Position Paper on the Standards and Qualifications of Care and the Global Rise in the Unethical and illegal Practice of Hair Transplantation Surgery. Adopted by the Board of Governors, ISHRS, 11/13/2019.
    PubMed
  • 8 Unger W, Solish N, Unger R. Delineating the “safe donor area” for hair transplantation. Am J Cosmet Surg 1994; 11: 239-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cole J, Devroye J. A calculated look at the donor area. Hair Transplant Forum Intl 2001; 11 (05) 150-154
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Rose PT. Difficulties with Follicular Isolation Technique, FIT, Aegean Masters Meeting, Athens, Greece, June 2–7, 2003
    PubMed
  • 11 Marritt E. The death of the density debate. Dermatol Surg 1999; 25 (08) 654-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar