Download PDF
Zahnmedizin up2date 2023; 17(06): 459-464
DOI: 10.1055/a-2210-2229
Schritt für Schritt

Die Komposit-Injektionstechnik zur Erzielung eines ästhetischen Ergebnisses nach kieferorthopädischer Behandlung

Sachin Chhatwani
,
Tim-Boyke Janssen
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Dieser Artikel stellt eine konservierende Methode für die Umgestaltung von Frontzähnen nach kieferorthopädischer Behandlung vor. So können beispielsweise Zapfenzähne, Nichtanlagen und Diastemata trotz kieferorthopädischer Behandlung zu ästhetisch und funktionell nachteiligen Ergebnissen führen. Neben prothetischen Lösungsansätzen rücken durch verbesserte Materialeigenschaften vermehrt auch Kompositaufbauten in den Mittelpunkt der Therapie.

Publication History

Article published online:
21 December 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Haerian A, Rafiei E, Joshan N. et al. Impact of variations in maxillary lateral incisor dimensions on smile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2022; 161: 84-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Li R, Mei L, Wang P. et al. Canine edge width and height affect dental esthetics in maxillary canine substitution treatment. Prog Orthod 2019; 20: 16
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Gavric A, Mirceta D, Jakobovic M. et al. Craniodentofacial characteristics, dental esthetics-related quality of life, and self-esteem. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 147: 711-718
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Klages U, Bruckner A, Zentner A. Dental aesthetics, self-awareness, and oral health-related quality of life in young adults. Eur J Orthod 2004; 26: 507-514
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Hua F, He H, Ngan P. et al. Prevalence of peg-shaped maxillary permanent lateral incisors: A meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013; 144: 97-109
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Khalaf K, Miskelly J, Voge E. et al. Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthod 2014; 41: 299-316
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Zachrisson BU, Rosa M, Toreskog S. Congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors: Canine substitution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 434-444
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Tuverson DL. Orthodontic treatment using canines in place of missing maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod 1970; 58: 109-127
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. American Journal of Orthodontics 1962; 48: 504-529
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bolton WA. Disharmony In Tooth Size And Its Relation To The Analysis And Treatment Of Malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-130
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Othman SA, Harradine NWT. Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios: a literature review. J Orthod 2006; 33: 45-51 discussion 29
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Chaves PRB, Karam AM, Machado AW. Does the presence of maxillary midline diastema influence the perception of dentofacial esthetics in video analysis. Angle Orthod 2021; 91: 54-60
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Maroulakos G, Maroulakos MP, Tsoukala E. et al. Dental Reshaping Using the Composite Resin Injection Technique After Dental Trauma and Orthodontic Treatment. J Dent Child (Chic) 2021; 88: 144-147
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Viswambaran M, Londhe SM, Kumar V. Conservative and esthetic management of diastema closure using porcelain laminate veneers. Med J Armed Forces India 2015; 71: S581-S585
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for anterior teeth. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2002; 87: 503-509
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Layton DM, Clarke M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of non-feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2013; 26: 111-124
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Layton DM, Clarke M, Walton TR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the survival of feldspathic porcelain veneers over 5 and 10 years. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 590-603
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Frese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ. et al. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. J Dent 2013; 41: 979-985
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Demirci M, Tuncer S, Öztaş E. et al. A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19: 2187-2199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Frankenberger R, Heidemann D, Staehle HJ, Hellwig E, Blunck U, Hickel R. DGZ-Gutachten zur Adhäsivtechnik. 2014
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA. et al. Self-etch adhesive systems: a literature review. Braz Dent J 2015; 26: 3-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Wajdowicz MN, Vandewalle KS, Means MT. Shear bond strength of new self-adhesive flowable composite resins. Gen Dent 2012; 60: e104-e108
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Cuevas-Suárez CE, Da Rosa WLdO, Lund RG. et al. Bonding Performance of Universal Adhesives: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 7-26
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Miletic V. Dental Composite Materials for Direct Restorations. Cham: Springer; 2017
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 25 Nair SR, Niranjan NT, Jayasheel A. et al. Comparative Evaluation of Colour Stability and Surface Hardness of Methacrylate Based Flowable and Packable Composite -In vitro Study. J Clin Diagn Res 2017; 11: ZC51-ZC54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Schütz S, Rosentritt M, Behr M. et al. Mechanical properties and three-body wear of dental restoratives and their comparative flowable materials. Quintessence Int 2010; 41: e1-e10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Baroudi K, Rodrigues JC. Flowable Resin Composites: A Systematic Review and Clinical Considerations. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZE18-ZE24
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ammannato R, Ferraris F, Marchesi G. The “index technique” in worn dentition: a new and conservative approach. Int J Esthet Dent 2015; 10: 68-99
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ammannato R, Rondoni D, Ferraris F. Update on the ‘index techniqueʼ in worn dentition: a no-prep restorative approach with a digital workflow. Int J Esthet Dent 2018; 13: 516-537
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Terry DA, Powers JM. A predictable resin composite injection technique, Part I. Dent Today 2014; 33: 98-101
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Terry DA, Powers JM, Mehta D. et al. A predictable resin composite injection technique, part 2. Dent Today 2014; 33: 12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Geštakovski D. The injectable composite resin technique: biocopy of a natural tooth–advantages of digital planning. Int J Esthet Dent 2021; 16: 280-299
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hosaka K, Tichy A, Motoyama Y. et al. Post-orthodontic recontouring of anterior teeth using composite injection technique with a digital workflow. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32: 638-644
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Coachman C, Arbeloa de L, Mahn G. et al. An Improved Direct Injection Technique With Flowable Composites. A Digital Workflow Case Report. Oper Dent 2020; 45: 235-242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Ypei Gia NR, Sampaio CS, Higashi C. et al. The injectable resin composite restorative technique: A case report. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021; 33: 404-414
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar