Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2217-9577
Oxidation of Alcohols to Aldehydes and Ketones Using a Catalytic Pairing of a Nitroxide and Nitric Acid
This research was funded by the University of Connecticut Research Enhancement Program.
Abstract
A methodology for the oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes and ketones is presented. The approach employs catalytic quantities of a nitroxide and nitric acid, with no additives or metal catalysts being required. It proves effective for a range of aromatic, heteroaromatic, and aliphatic alcohol substrates, the desired products being formed in good to excellent yield. In the case of primary alcohols, the oxidation can be stopped at the aldehyde without concomitant formation of the corresponding carboxylic acid.
Supporting Information
- Supporting information for this article is available online 577.
- Supporting Information
Publication History
Received: 24 October 2023
Accepted after revision: 22 November 2023
Accepted Manuscript online:
27 November 2023
Article published online:
21 December 2023
© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References and Notes
- 1a Liquid Phase Aerobic Oxidation Catalysis: Industrial Applications and Academic Perspectives: Industrial Applications and Academic Perspectives. Stahl SS, Alsters PL. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2016
- 1b Ahluwalia VK. Oxidation in Organic Synthesis. CRC Press; New York: 2012
- 1c Caron S. Practical Synthetic Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Principles, and Techniques. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2011
- 2a Shibuya M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020; 61: 151515
- 2b Beejapur HA, Zhang Q, Hu K, Zhu L, Wang J, Ye Z. ACS Catal. 2019; 9: 2777
- 2c Leadbeater NE, Bobbitt JM. Aldrichimica Acta 2014; 47: 65
- 2d Bobbitt JM, Brückner C, Merbouh N. In Organic Reactions . John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken: 2010: 103-424
- 3 For the seminal publication, see: Bobbitt JM. J. Org. Chem. 1998; 63: 9367
- 4a He Y, Liu Q, Yang J, Zheng Z, Chai G.-L, Zhang X, Fan X. Org. Lett. 2022; 24: 7839
- 4b Xu B, Shang Y, Jie X, Zhang X, Kann J, Yedage SL, Su W. Green Chem. 2020; 22: 1827
- 4c Lambert KM, Stempel ZD, Kiendzior SM, Bartelson AL, Bailey WF. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 82: 11440
- 5 Hamlin T, Kelly C, Ovian J, Wiles R, Tilley L, Leadbeater N. J. Org. Chem. 2017; 80: 8150
- 6 Miller SA, Nandi J, Leadbeater NE, Eddy NA. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020; 108
- 7 León Sandoval A, Doherty KE, Wadey GP, Schroeder CM, Leadbeater NE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2023; 116: 154332
- 8 León Sandoval A, Doherty KE, Wadey GP, Leadbeater NE. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2022; 20: 2249
- 9 Miller SA, Sandoval AL, Leadbeater NE. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020; 61: 151464
- 10a Ryland BL, Stahl SS. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014; 53: 8824
- 10b Miles KC, Stahl SS. Aldrichimica Acta 2015; 48: 8
- 11 Zhao Y, Li Y, Shen Z, Hu X, Hu B, Jin L, Sun N, Li M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2019; 60: 150994
- 12 Miao C.-X, He L.-N, Wang J.-L, Wu F. J. Org. Chem. 2010; 75: 257
- 13 Tao J, Lu Q, Chu C, Liu R, Liang X. Synthesis 2010; 3974
- 14 He X, Shen Z, Mo W, Sun N, Hu B, Hu X. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009; 351: 89
- 15 Wang X, Liu R, Jin Y, Liang X. Chem. Eur. J. 2008; 14: 2679
- 16 Lagerblom K, Keskiväli J, Parviainen A, Mannisto J, Repo T. ChemCatChem 2018; 10: 2908
- 17 Ma S, Liu J, Li S, Chen B, Cheng J, Kuang J, Liu Y, Wan B, Wang Y, Ye J, Yu Q, Yuan W, Yu S. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011; 353: 1005
- 18a Aellig C, Girard C, Hermans I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011; 50: 12355
- 18b Strazzolini P, Runcio A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003; 526
- 18c Gasparrini F, Giovannoli M, Misiti D. Synth. Commun. 1988; 18: 69
- 18d Ogata Y, Sawaki Y, Matsunaga F, Tezuka H. Tetrahedron 1966; 22: 265
- 19a Di Somma I, Russo D, Andreozzi R, Marotta R, Guido S. Chem. Eng. J. 2017; 308: 738
- 19b Ross DS, Gu CL, Hum GP, Malhotra R. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 1986; 18: 1277
- 20 General Procedure To a 4-dram reaction vial equipped with a stir bar were added the starting material (2 mmol, 1 equiv), 4-acetamido-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-oxyl (ACT, 85mg, 0.2 equiv), 2 mL of dichloromethane, and nitric acid (70%, 0.051 mL, 0.4 equiv). The vial was closed tightly. The contents were then heated in a sand bath at 55 °C. Upon completion, the product mixture was loaded onto a pad of silica gel. Diethyl ether or dichloromethane was passed through the silica gel, first eluting any unreacted alcohol and then the product. The nitroso intermediate and any carboxylic acid formed in the reaction remain adsorbed on the silica. The solvent was then removed from the filtrate of the product under vacuum, affording the aldehyde or ketone in pure form.
- 21 Representative Spectral Data Octanal (6a) Obtained as colorless oil in 3 h (0.233 g, 89%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.76 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 2.41 (td, J = 7.3, 1.9 Hz, 2 H), 1.63 (p, J = 7.3 Hz, 2 H), 1.30 (dd, J = 8.5, 5.4 Hz, 8 H), 0.92 0.84 (m, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 202.96, 77.33, 77.01, 76.69, 43.92, 31.62, 29.13, 29.01, 22.58, 22.10, 14.04. 4-(Trifluoromethyl)benzaldehyde (6d) Obtained as light-yellow oil in 1 h (0.306 g, 88%). 1 H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 10.11 (s, 1 H), 8.01 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 191.04, 129.92, 126.15, 126.11. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ = –63.10, –161.64. Furfural (6j) Obtained as yellow liquid in 1 h (0.123 g, 64%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 9.66 (s, 1 H), 7.71–7.64 (m, 1 H), 7.25 (dd, J = 3.6, 0.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.60 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.7 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 177.88, 153.03, 148.06, 120.91, 112.58. 4-Methoxyacetophenone (6o) Obtained as a yellow oil in 2 h (0.266 g, 88%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 7.98–7.89 (m, 2 H), 6.97–6.89 (m, 2 H), 3.87 (s, 3 H), 2.55 (s, 3 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 196.77, 163.50, 130.59, 130.38, 113.69, 55.47, 26.34. 1-Phenyl-2-propyl-1-one (6t) Obtained as yellow solid in 1 h (0.212 g, 82%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.20–8.06 (m, 2 H), 7.68–7.59 (m, 1 H), 7.56–7.45 (m, 2 H), 3.44 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 177.41, 136.17, 134.53, 129.72, 128.70, 80.76, 80.29. 2-Adamantanone (6w) Obtained as white solid in 1 h (0.265 g, 90%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.54 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 2 H), 2.14–1.96 (m, 12 H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 46.98, 39.29, 36.32, 27.46.
For background, see:
For reviews, see:
For representative recent examples, see:
For reviews, see: