PDF herunterladen
Rofo 2024; 196(09): 912-920
DOI: 10.1055/a-2224-9100
Review

Structured image diagnosis of vertebral body degeneration and intervertebral disc damage – Binary image criteria and comparison for systematic image analysis for occupational diseases 2108 and 2110

Part 2: “Comparison images” Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch
Rainer Braunschweig
1   Institute of Radiology, University-Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
2   Working group musculoskeletal imaging, DRG German Radiological Society, Berlin, DE, Germany
,
Daniela Kildal
3   SZO, Radiology, Valais Hospital, Visp, Switzerland
4   Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
,
Michael Meyer-Clement
5   Institute of Traumatological and Orthopedical Assessments Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
,
Andreas Tiemann
6   Institute of Traumatological and Orthopedical Assessments Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
,
Rolf Janka
1   Institute of Radiology, University-Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Job-related limitations of earning capacity are eligible for recognition under social legislation and may be subject to compensation (see Part 1).

Method For the recognition of an occupational disease (BK), diagnostic imaging is required as part of the legal determination procedure for occupational diseases 2108/2110 (“occupational disc disease”). The focus is on image criteria on X-ray images and MRI examinations. In a consensus paper under the guidance of the German Social Accident Insurance Institutions from 2005, the characteristic patterns are defined and explained extensively and summarized in typical occupation-related constellations. This article presents representative image examples as a reference system for expert reporting as far as the typical patterns from the consensus paper are concerned.

Conclusion In Part 2, comparison images with the typical findings of the vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs according to occupational diseases are systematically presented, explained, and offered as a reference system for expert assessment. The image criteria can be used as “evidence by eye” (Heuck) in the recognition procedure.

Key Points

  • Occupational diseases are defined by the legislator in the “List of Occupational Diseases”.

  • For occupational intervertebral disc diseases (OD nos. 2108/2110), constellations of findings are defined.

  • Within the scope of diagnostic imaging, a large number of image criteria are used.

  • Part 1 explains the basics and the legal background.

  • Part 2 provides the image criteria on the basis of “comparison images” as a reference catalog.

Citation Format

  • Braunschweig R, Kildal D, Meyer-Clement M et al. Structured image diagnosis of vertebral body degeneration and intervertebral disc damage – Binary image criteria and comparison for systematic image analysis for occupational diseases 2108 and 2110. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 912 – 920

Keywords

occupational diseases - degenerative spine conditions - structured image diagnosis - intervertebral disc degeneration - systematic medical image analysis


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 27. Februar 2023

Angenommen: 13. November 2023

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
12. Februar 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Braunschweig R, Kildal D, Meyer-Clement M. et al. Strukturierte Bild-Befundung von Wirbelkörperdegeneration und Bandscheibenschäden Binäre Bildkriterien und Vergleichsbilder für die systematische Bildanalyse bei den Berufskrankheiten 2108 und 2110 – Teil 1. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 1-7 DOI: 10.1055/a-2168-7399.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Bundesgesetzblatt I, S. 2245, Anlage 1 zur Berufskrankheiten-Verordnung (BKV) in der Fassung der Fünften Verordnung zur Änderung der Berufskrankheiten-Verordnung vom 29. Juni 2021.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Heuck W. Radiologische Fachgutachten. Berlin: Springer; 1999
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bolm-Audorff U. et al Medizinische Beurteilungskriterien zu bandscheibenbedingten Berufskrankheiten der Lendenwirbelsäule Teil I und II: Trauma Berufskrankh. 2005; 7/3: 211-252 und 7/4: 320-332. DOI: 10.1007/s10039-005-1027-5.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Roberts N, Gratin C, Whitehouse GH. MRI analysis of lumbar intervertebral disc height in young and older population. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 880-887
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Spahn G, Ramadani M, Günther S. et al. Messung der Bandscheibenhöhen in der Lendenwirbelsäule. Vergleich von Projektionsradiografie und Kernspintomografie, Messmethode und Bestimmung der Inter-Observer-Reliabilität. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1994-0879.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Hurxthal LM. Measurment of anterior vertebral compressions and biconcave vertebrae. J Am Radiol 1968; 103: 635-644
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Dihlmann W, Dihlmann M, Stäbler A. Gelenke – Wirbelverbindungen. 4. Aufl.. Stuttgart: Thieme; 2010
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Hult L. Cervical, Dorsal and Lumbar Spinal Syndromes. Acta Orthop Scand 1954; 17: 1-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pfirrmann CW, Metzdorf A, Zanetti M. et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration. Spine 2002; 26: 1873-1878
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar