Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere 2024; 52(01): 17-24
DOI: 10.1055/a-2229-3039
Originalartikel

Applicability, reproducibility, and reliability of the German version of the Glasgow composite measured pain scale – feline during implementation into a small animal clinic

Article in several languages: deutsch | English
Alexandra Schütter*
1   Abteilung für Anästhesie und Analgesie, Klinik für Kleintiere, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
,
Ana Chorbadzhieva*
1   Abteilung für Anästhesie und Analgesie, Klinik für Kleintiere, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
,
Sabine Kästner
1   Abteilung für Anästhesie und Analgesie, Klinik für Kleintiere, Stiftung Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate reproducibility and practicality of the German version of the Glasgow composite measured pain scale – feline, during its implementation into a German veterinary hospital.

Material and methods The study comprised of 2 parts. Participation of veterinary professionals was voluntary. During part 1, 15 staff members (all rater=AR) with variable clinical experience (nurses, interns, junior clinician, senior clinicians), from 4 disciplines (anesthesia, internal medicine, surgery, neurology), and one main investigator (AC), pain scored 45 diseased cats and 10 healthy cats. Part 2 was an online survey, evaluating the practical experience of participants during part 1 and asking for suggestions to improve the scale and process of pain assessment. For part 1 normal distribution of data was tested by Shapiro-Wilk-Test and histograms. Intrarater and interrater reliability were evaluated by calculating the intraclass-correlation. Statistical analysis of part 2 used descriptive methods.

Results The interrater reliability was moderate (ICC AR : 0.59) and the intrarater reliability was good (ICC AC : 0.88). The pain scores of cats with medical (AR: 3.06±2.33, AC 3.52±2.34) and surgical disease (AR: 3.78±2.38, AC: 4.02±2.72) showed no significant difference. All healthy cats were classified as “not painful” (AR: 0.77±0.67, AC: 1.09±0.83). Clinical experience of the rater did not significantly influence pain scores. The GCMPS-F was judged as easy to use and as helpful tool for cats with unclear pain conditions.

Conclusion The GCMPS-F had a good acceptance and moderate interrater reliability.

Clinical Relevance Using the German version of the GCMPS-F, veterinary professionals from different disciplines and with different grades of specialisation can reliably assess pain levels in cats without prior extensive training.

Zusatzmaterial

Supplementary material



Publication History

Received: 29 June 2023

Accepted: 13 November 2023

Article published online:
27 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Merola I, Mills DS. Systematic review of the behavioural assessment of pain in cats. J Feline Med Surg 2016; 18: 60-76
  • 2 Simon BT, Scallan EM, Carroll G. et al. The lack of analgesic use (oligoanalgesia) in small animal practice. Journal of Small Animal Practice 2017; 58: 543-554
  • 3 Epstein M, Rodan I, Griffenhagen G. et al. 2015 AAHA/AAFP Pain Management Guidelines for Dogs and Cats. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2015; 51: 67-84
  • 4 Short CE. Fundamentals of pain perception in animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 1998; 59: 125-133
  • 5 Cambridge AJ, Tobias KM, Newberry RC. et al. Subjective and objective measurements of postoperative pain in cats. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 685-690
  • 6 Brondani JT, Luna SP, Padovani CR. Refinement and initial validation of a multidimensional composite scale for use in assessing acute postoperative pain in cats. Am J Vet Res 2011; 72: 174-183
  • 7 Brondani JT, Mama KR, Luna SP. et al. Validation of the English version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats. BMC Vet Res 2013; 9: 143
  • 8 Brodani JT, Luna SP, Crosignani N. et al. Validation of the spanish version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale to assess postoperative pain in cats. Arch Med Vet 2014; 46: 477-486
  • 9 Reid J, Scott EM, Calvo G. et al. Definitive Glasgow acute pain scale for cats: validation and intervention level. Veterinary Record 2017; 180: 449-471
  • 10 Della Rocca G, Catanzaro A, CONTI MB. et al. Validation of the Italian version of the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for the assessment of postoperative pain in cats. Vet Ital 2018; 54: 49-61
  • 11 Evangelista MC, Watanabe R, Leung VSY. et al. Facial expressions of pain in cats: the development and validation of a Feline Grimace Scale. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 19128
  • 12 Shipley H, Guedes A, Graham L. et al. Preliminary appraisal of the reliability and validity of the Colorado State University Feline Acute Pain Scale. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 21: 335-339
  • 13 Holden E, Calvo G, Collins M. et al. Evaluation of facial expression in acute pain in cats. J Small Anim Pract 2014; 55: 615-621
  • 14 Steagall PV J, Benito J, Monteiro BP. et al. Analgesic effects of gabapentin and buprenorphine in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy using two pain-scoring systems: a randomized clinical trial. J Feline Med Surg 2018; 20: 741-748
  • 15 Gordon-Evans WJ, Suh HY, Guedes AG. Controlled, non-inferiority trial of bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 1098612X19892355
  • 16 Watanabe R, Doodnaught G, Proulx C. et al. A multidisciplinary study of pain in cats undergoing dental extractions: A prospective, blinded, clinical trial. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0213195
  • 17 Watanabe R, Marcoux RJ, Evangelista MC. et al. The analgesic effects of buprenorphine (Vetergesic or Simbadol) in cats undergoing dental extractions: A randomized, blinded, clinical trial. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0230079
  • 18 Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17: 268-274
  • 19 Calvo G, Holden E, Reid J. et al. Development of a behaviour-based measurement tool with defined intervention level for assessing acute pain in cats. J Small Anim Pract 2014; 55: 622-629
  • 20 Evangelista MC, Steagall PV. Agreement and reliability of the Feline Grimace Scale among cat owners, veterinarians, veterinary students and nurses. Sci Rep 2011; 11: 5262
  • 21 Al-Gizawiy MM, wal-gizawiy EPR. Comparison of preoperative carprofen and postoperative butorphanol as postsurgical analgesics in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Vet Anaesth Analg 2004; 31: 164-174
  • 22 Hewson CJ, Dohoo IR, Lemke KA. Factors affecting the use of postincisional analgesics in dogs and cats by Canadian veterinarians in 2001. Canadian Veterinary Journal-Revue Veterinaire Canadienne 2006; 47: 453-459
  • 23 Hunt JR, Knowles TG, Lascelles BD. Prescription of perioperative analgesics by UK small animal veterinary surgeons in 2013. Vet Rec 2015; 176: 493
  • 24 Morales-Vallecilla C, Ramirez N, Villar D. Survey of Pain Knowledge and Analgesia in Dogs and Cats by Colombian Veterinarians. Vet Sci 2019; 6: 6
  • 25 Moody CM, Niel L, Pang DJ. Is training necessary for efficacious use of the Glasgow Feline Composite Measure Pain Scale?. Can Vet J 2022; 63: 609-616
  • 26 Zeiler GE, Fosgate GT, Van Vollenhoven E. et al. Assessment of behavioural changes in domestic cats during short-term hospitalisation. J Feline Med Surg 2014; 16: 499-503
  • 27 Uetake K, Goto A, Koyama R. et al. Effects of single caging and cage size on behavior and stress level of domestic neutered cats housed in an animal shelter. Anim Sci J. 2013; 84: 272-274
  • 28 Belew AM, Barlett T, Brown SA. Evaluation of the white-coat effect in cats. J Vet Intern Med 1999; 13: 134-142 10.1892/0891-6640(1999)013<0134:eotwce>2.3.co;2
  • 29 Amat M, Camps T, Manteca X. Stress in owned cats: behavioural changes and welfare implications. J Feline Med Surg 2016; 18: 577-586
  • 30 Buisman M, Hasiuk MMM, Gunn M. et al. The influence of demeanor on scores from two validated feline pain assessment scales during the perioperative period. Vet Anaesth Analg 2017; 44: 646-655
  • 31 Kamata M, Nagahama S, Kakishima K. et al. Comparison of behavioral effects of morphine and fentanyl in dogs and cats. J Vet Med Sci 2012; 74: 231-234
  • 32 Finka LR, Luna SP, Brondani JT. Geometric morphometrics for the study of facial expressions in non-human animals, using the domestic cat as an exemplar. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 9883
  • 33 Matsumiya LC, Sorge RE, Sotocinal SG. et al. Using the Mouse Grimace Scale to reevaluate the efficacy of postoperative analgesics in laboratory mice. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2012; 51: 42-49
  • 34 Dalla Costa E, Minero M, Lebelt D. et al. Development of the Horse Grimace Scale (HGS) as a pain assessment tool in horses undergoing routine castration. PLoS One 2014; 9: e92281