Download PDF
J Knee Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2232-4856
Original Article

Postoperative Bracing after Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Andrew L. Schaver
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia
,
Meaghan A. Tranovich
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Olivia C. O'Reilly
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Matthew J. Bollier 
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Kyle R. Duchman
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Brian R. Wolf 
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
,
Robert W. Westermann
2   Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
› Author Affiliations Funding Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Center For Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1TR002537.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

It is unclear if bracing is necessary after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLr) for recurrent patellar instability. We hypothesize that patients who did not use a brace will have similar outcomes to those who were braced postoperatively. A retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated MPFLr from January 2015 to September 2020 at a single institution was performed. Those with less than 6 weeks of follow-up were excluded. The braced group was provided a hinged-knee brace postoperatively until the return of quadriceps function, which was determined by the treating physical therapist (brace, “B”; no brace, “NB”). Time to straight leg raise (SLR) without lag, recurrent instability, and total re-operations were determined. Univariate analysis and logistic regression were used to evaluate outcomes (statistical significance, p < 0.05). Overall, 229 isolated MPFLr were included (B: 165 knees, 146 patients; NB: 64 knees, 58 patients). Baseline demographics were similar (all p > 0.05). Median time to SLR without lag was shorter in the NB group (41 days [interquartile range [IQR]: 20–47] vs. 44 days [IQR: 35.5–88.3], p = 0.01), while return to sport times were equivalent (B: 155 days [IQR: 127.3–193.8] vs. NB: 145 days [IQR: 124–162], p = 0.31). Recurrent instability rates were not significantly different (B: 12 knees [7.27%] vs. NB: 1 knee [1.56%], p = 0.09), but the re-operation rate was higher in the brace group (20 knees [12.1%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.001). Regression analysis identified brace use (odds ratio [OR]: 19.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.43–269.40, p = 0.026) and female patients (OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.01–7.34, p = 0.049) to be associated with needing reoperation. Recurrent instability rates and return to sport times were similar between patients who did or did not use a hinged knee brace after isolated MPFLr. Re-operation rates were higher in the braced group. Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III

Keywords

patellar instability - MPFL reconstruction - bracing - rehabilitation

Note

This study was approved by UI IRB.




Publication History

Received: 09 March 2023

Accepted: 18 December 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
19 December 2023

Article published online:
07 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Post WR, Fithian DC. Patellofemoral instability: a consensus statement from the AOSSM/PFF patellofemoral instability workshop. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6 (01) 2325967117750352
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Mitchell J, Magnussen RA, Collins CL. et al. Epidemiology of patellofemoral instability injuries among high school athletes in the United States. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43 (07) 1676-1682
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Schneider DK, Grawe B, Magnussen RA. et al. Outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for the treatment of recurrent lateral patellar dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2016; 44 (11) 2993-3005
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Palmu S, Kallio PE, Donell ST, Helenius I, Nietosvaara Y. Acute patellar dislocation in children and adolescents: a randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008; 90 (03) 463-470
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Bicos J, Fulkerson JP, Amis A. Current concepts review: the medial patellofemoral ligament. Am J Sports Med 2007; 35 (03) 484-492
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Weber AE, Nathani A, Dines JS. et al. An algorithmic approach to the management of recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98 (05) 417-427
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Lieber AC, Steinhaus ME, Liu JN, Hurwit D, Chiaia T, Strickland SM. Quality and variability of online available physical therapy protocols from academic orthopaedic surgery programs for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 (07) 2325967119855991
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Lightsey HM, Wright ML, Trofa DP, Popkin CA, Ahmad CS, Redler LH. Rehabilitation variability following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Phys Sportsmed 2018; 46 (04) 441-448
    Google Scholar
  • 9 McGee TG, Cosgarea AJ, McLaughlin K, Tanaka M, Johnson K. Rehabilitation after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 2017; 25 (02) 105-113
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Zaman S, White A, Shi WJ, Freedman KB, Dodson CC. Return-to-play guidelines after medial patellofemoral ligament surgery for recurrent patellar instability: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 2018; 46 (10) 2530-2539
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Manske RC, Prohaska D. Rehabilitation following medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellar instability. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2017; 12 (03) 494-511
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Fisher B, Nyland J, Brand E, Curtin B. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation: a systematic review including rehabilitation and return-to-sports efficacy. Arthroscopy 2010; 26 (10) 1384-1394
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Fithian DC, Powers CM, Khan N. Rehabilitation of the knee after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 2010; 29 (02) 283-290 , ix
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Sappey-Marinier E, Sonnery-Cottet B, O'Loughlin P. et al. Clinical outcomes and predictive factors for failure with isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability: a series of 211 reconstructions with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Am J Sports Med 2019; 47 (06) 1323-1330
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Mountney J, Senavongse W, Amis AA, Thomas NP. Tensile strength of the medial patellofemoral ligament before and after repair or reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (01) 36-40
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Burks RT, Luker MG. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Tech Orthop 1997; 12 (03) 185-191
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Lenschow S, Schliemann B, Gestring J, Herbort M, Schulze M, Kösters C. Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: fixation strength of 5 different techniques for graft fixation at the patella. Arthroscopy 2013; 29 (04) 766-773
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Joyner PW, Bruce J, Roth TS. et al. Biomechanical tensile strength analysis for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee 2017; 24 (05) 965-976
    Google Scholar