Innovations in the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Health: A Glimpse
                    into the Future

Jonathan P. Beausejour; Kevan S. Knowles; Abigail T Wilson; L. Colby Mangum; Ethan C. Hill; William J. Hanney; Adam J. Wells; David H. Fukuda; JeffreyR. Stout; Matt S. Stock

doi:10.1055/a-2242-3226

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(09): 659-671
DOI: 10.1055/a-2242-3226

Review

Innovations in the Assessment of Skeletal Muscle Health: A Glimpse into the Future

Authors

Jonathan P. Beausejour

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
Kevan S. Knowles

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
Abigail T Wilson

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
L. Colby Mangum

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
Ethan C. Hill

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
William J. Hanney

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
Adam J. Wells

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
David H. Fukuda

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
JeffreyR. Stout

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States
Matt S. Stock

¹Institute of Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is the largest organ system in the human body and plays critical roles in athletic performance, mobility, and disease pathogenesis. Despite growing recognition of its importance by major health organizations, significant knowledge gaps remain regarding skeletal muscle health and its crosstalk with nearly every physiological system. Relevant public health challenges like pain, injury, obesity, and sarcopenia underscore the need to accurately assess skeletal muscle health and function. Feasible, non-invasive techniques that reliably evaluate metrics including muscle pain, dynamic structure, contractility, circulatory function, body composition, and emerging biomarkers are imperative to unraveling the complexities of skeletal muscle. Our concise review highlights innovative or overlooked approaches for comprehensively assessing skeletal muscle in vivo. We summarize recent advances in leveraging dynamic ultrasound imaging, muscle echogenicity, tensiomyography, blood flow restriction protocols, molecular techniques, body composition, and pain assessments to gain novel insight into muscle physiology from cellular to whole-body perspectives. Continued development of precise, non-invasive tools to investigate skeletal muscle are critical in informing impactful discoveries in exercise and rehabilitation science.

Keywords

pain - injury - rehabilitation - athlete performance - blood flow restriction - muscle quality

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Frontera WR, Ochala J. Skeletal muscle: a brief review of structure and function. Calcif Tissue Int 2015; 96: 183-195
2 McCuller C, Jessu R, Callahan AL. Physiology, Skeletal Muscle. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023
3 Goodpaster BH, Carlson CL, Visser M. et al. Attenuation of skeletal muscle and strength in the elderly: The Health ABC Study. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2001; 90: 2157-2165
4 English KL, Paddon-Jones D. Protecting muscle mass and function in older adults during bed rest. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2010; 13: 34-39
5 Raue U, Slivka D, Minchev K. et al. Improvements in whole muscle and myocellular function are limited with high-intensity resistance training in octogenarian women. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2009; 106: 1611-1617
6 Timmons JA. Variability in training-induced skeletal muscle adaptation. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2011; 110: 846-853
7 Churchward-Venne TA, Burd NA, Phillips SM. Nutritional regulation of muscle protein synthesis with resistance exercise: strategies to enhance anabolism. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2012; 9: 40
8 Teyhen DS. Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: The roadmap ahead. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2007; 37: 431-433
9 Prentice CLS, Milanese S, Massy-Westropp N. et al. The reliability of rehabilitative ultrasound to measure lateral abdominal muscle thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021; 53: 102357
10 Lanza MB, Rock K, Marchese V. et al. Ultrasound measures of muscle thickness and subcutaneous tissue from the hip abductors: Inter- and intra-rater reliability. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022; 62: 102612
11 Devorski L, Skibski A, Mangum LC. Muscle function obtained with motion mode ultrasound and surface electromyography during core endurance exercise. . Available from https://app.jove.com/t/64335/muscle-function-obtained-with-motion-mode-ultrasound-surface Accessed: 14 August 2023
12 Skibski A, Devorski L, Mangum LC. Providing visual biofeedback using brightness mode ultrasound during a golf swing. J Vis Exp 2022; e64333
13 Mangum LC, Sutherlin MA, Saliba SA. et al. Reliability of ultrasound imaging measures of transverse abdominis and lumbar multifidus in various positions. PM&R 2016; 8: 340-347
14 DeJong AF, Mangum LC, Hertel J. Ultrasound imaging of the gluteal muscles during the Y-balance test in individuals with or without chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train 2020; 55: 49-57
15 Teyhen DS, Miltenberger CE, Deiters HM. et al. The use of ultrasound imaging of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver in subjects with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 346-355
16 Loturco I, Gil S, Laurino CF, de S. et al. Differences in muscle mechanical properties between elite power and endurance athletes: a comparative study. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1723-1728
17 Parmar A, Scott M, Brand C. et al. An assessment of the contractile properties of the shoulder musculature in elite volleyball players using tensiomyography. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2020; 15: 1099-1109
18 García-García O, Cancela-Carral JM, Huelin-Trillo F. Neuromuscular profile of top-level women kayakers assessed through tensiomyography. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 844-853
19 Piqueras-Sanchiz F, Martín-Rodríguez S, Pareja-Blanco F. et al. Mechanomyographic measures of muscle contractile properties are influenced by electrode size and stimulation pulse duration. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 8192
20 de Paula Simola RÁ, Harms N, Raeder C. et al. Tensiomyography reliability and prediction of changes in muscle force following heavy eccentric strength exercise using muscle mechanical properties. Sports Technol 2015; 8: 58-66
21 Macgregor LJ, Hunter AM, Orizio C. et al. Assessment of skeletal muscle contractile properties by radial displacement: the case for tensiomyography. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1607-1620
22 Collett J, Dawes H, Meaney A. et al. Exercise for multiple sclerosis: a single-blind randomized trial comparing three exercise intensities. Mult Scler 2011; 17: 594-603
23 Wens I, Dalgas U, Vandenabeele F. et al. High intensity exercise in multiple sclerosis: effects on muscle contractile characteristics and exercise capacity, a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2015; 10: e0133697
24 Keytsman C, Hansen D, Wens I. et al. Impact of high-intensity concurrent training on cardiovascular risk factors in persons with multiple sclerosis – pilot study. Disabil Rehabil 2019; 41: 430-435
25 Laurentino GC, Ugrinowitsch C, Roschel H. et al. Strength training with blood flow restriction diminishes myostatin gene expression. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2012; 44: 406-412
26 Vechin FC, Libardi CA, Conceição MS. et al. Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 1071-1076
27 Schoenfeld BJ, Peterson MD, Ogborn D. et al. Effects of low- vs. high-load resistance training on muscle strength and hypertrophy in well-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 2015; 29: 2954-2963
28 Hill EC, Housh TJ, Smith CM. et al. Acute changes in muscle thickness, edema, and blood flow are not different between low-load blood flow restriction and non-blood flow restriction. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2021; 41: 452-460
29 Hill EC, Housh TJ, Keller JL. et al. Early phase adaptations in muscle strength and hypertrophy as a result of low-intensity blood flow restriction resistance training. Eur J Appl Physiol 2018; 118: 1831-1843
30 Hill EC. The effects of 4 weeks of blood flow restriction and low-load resistance training on muscle strength, power, hypertrophy, and neuromuscular adaptation. ETD collection for University of Nebraska - Lincoln. 2019 Available from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI13814015
31 Hill EC. Eccentric, but not concentric blood flow restriction resistance training increases muscle strength in the untrained limb. Phys Ther Sport 2020; 43: 1-7
32 Mattar MA, Gualano B, Perandini LA. et al. Safety and possible effects of low-intensity resistance training associated with partial blood flow restriction in polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Arthritis Res Ther 2014; 16: 473
33 Lamberti N, Straudi S, Donadi M. et al. Effectiveness of blood flow-restricted slow walking on mobility in severe multiple sclerosis: A pilot randomized trial. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020; 30: 1999-2009
34 Ogawa H, Nakajima T, Shibasaki I. et al. Low-intensity resistance training with moderate blood flow restriction appears safe and increases skeletal muscle strength and size in cardiovascular surgery patients: a pilot study. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 547
35 Takarada Y, Takazawa H, Ishii N. Applications of vascular occlusion diminish disuse atrophy of knee extensor muscles. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 2035-2039
36 Hughes L, Rosenblatt B, Haddad F. et al. Comparing the effectiveness of blood flow restriction and traditional heavy load resistance training in the post-surgery rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction patients: A UK National Health Service randomised controlled trial. Sports Med 2019; 49: 1787-1805
37 Abe T, Sakamaki M, Fujita S. et al. Effects of low-intensity walk training with restricted leg blood flow on muscle strength and aerobic capacity in older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2010; 33: 34-40
38 Yasuda T, Fukumura K, Iida H. et al. Effect of low-load resistance exercise with and without blood flow restriction to volitional fatigue on muscle swelling. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 919-926
39 Barbalho M, Rocha AC, Seus TL. et al. Addition of blood flow restriction to passive mobilization reduces the rate of muscle wasting in elderly patients in the intensive care unit: a within-patient randomized trial. Clin Rehabil 2019; 33: 233-240
40 Proppe CE, Aldeghi TM, Rivera PM. et al. 75-repetition versus sets to failure of blood flow restriction exercise on indices of muscle damage in women. Eur J Sport Sci 2023; 1-9
41 Gray SM, Cuomo AM, Proppe CE. et al. Effects of sex and cuff pressure on physiological responses during blood flow restriction resistance exercise in young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2023; 55: 920-931
42 Loenneke JP, Allen KM, Mouser JG. et al. Blood flow restriction in the upper and lower limbs is predicted by limb circumference and systolic blood pressure. Eur J Appl Physiol 2015; 115: 397-405
43 Reis JF, Fatela P, Mendonca GV. et al. Tissue oxygenation in response to different relative levels of blood-flow restricted exercise. Front Physiol 2019; 10: 407
44 Weir JP. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231-240
45 Hughes L, Jeffries O, Waldron M. et al. Influence and reliability of lower-limb arterial occlusion pressure at different body positions. PeerJ 2018; 6: e4697
46 Hunt JEA, Stodart C, Ferguson RA. The influence of participant characteristics on the relationship between cuff pressure and level of blood flow restriction. Eur J Appl Physiol 2016; 116: 1421-1432
47 Aniceto RR, da Silva Leandro L. Practical blood flow restriction training: new methodological directions for practice and research. Sports Med Open 2022; 8: 87
48 FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group BEST. (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration (US);. 2016
49 Califf RM. Biomarker definitions and their applications. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2018; 243: 213-221
50 Gong F, Wei H-X, Li Q. et al. Evaluation and comparison of serological methods for COVID-19 diagnosis. Front Mol Biosci 2021; 8: 682405
51 Katsanos AH, Kyriakidi K, Karassa FB. et al. Biomarker Development in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases. In: D'Hooghe T (ed). Biomarkers for Endometriosis. Springer; Cham: 2017: 41-75
52 Haro I, Sanmartí R, Gómara MJ. Implications of post-translational modifications in autoimmunity with emphasis on citrullination, homocitrullination and acetylation for the pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23: 15803
53 Fosang AJ, Last K, Stanton H. et al. Neoepitope antibodies against MMP-cleaved and aggrecanase-cleaved aggrecan. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 622: 312-347
54 Rogers LD, Overall CM. Proteolytic post-translational modification of proteins: proteomic tools and methodology. Mol Cell Proteomics 2013; 12: 3532-3542
55 Arvanitidis A, Henriksen K, Karsdal MA. et al. Neo-epitope peptides as biomarkers of disease progression for muscular dystrophies and other myopathies. J Neuromuscul Dis 2016; 3: 333-346
56 Karsdal MA, Henriksen K, Leeming DJ. et al. Novel combinations of Post-Translational Modification (PTM) neo-epitopes provide tissue-specific biochemical markers--are they the cause or the consequence of the disease?. Clin Biochem 2010; 43: 793-804
57 Drescher C, Konishi M, Ebner N. et al. Loss of muscle mass: Current developments in cachexia and sarcopenia focused on biomarkers and treatment. Int J Cardiol 2016; 202: 766-772
58 Nedergaard A, Karsdal MA, Sun S. et al. Serological muscle loss biomarkers: an overview of current concepts and future possibilities. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2013; 4: 1-17
59 Nedergaard A, Sun S, Karsdal MA. et al. Type VI collagen turnover-related peptides-novel serological biomarkers of muscle mass and anabolic response to loading in young men. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2013; 4: 267-275
60 Nedergaard A, Dalgas U, Primdahl H. et al. Collagen fragment biomarkers as serological biomarkers of lean body mass – a biomarker pilot study from the DAHANCA25B cohort and matched controls. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2015; 6: 335-342
61 Sun S, Henriksen K, Karsdal MA. et al. Measurement of a MMP-2 degraded Titin fragment in serum reflects changes in muscle turnover induced by atrophy. Exp Gerontol 2014; 58: 83-89
62 Nielsen MJ, Nedergaard AF, Sun S. et al. The neo-epitope specific PRO-C3 ELISA measures true formation of type III collagen associated with liver and muscle parameters. Am J Transl Res 2013; 5: 303-315
63 Reule CA, Scholz C, Schoen C. et al. Reduced muscular fatigue after a 12-week leucine-rich amino acid supplementation combined with moderate training in elderly: a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2016; 2: e000156
64 Monti E, Sarto F, Sartori R. et al. C-terminal agrin fragment as a biomarker of muscle wasting and weakness: a narrative review. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2023; 14: 730-744
65 Thambisetty M, Lovestone S. Blood-based biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease: challenging but feasible. Biomark Med 2010; 4: 65-79
66 Goodpaster BH, Park SW, Harris TB. et al. The loss of skeletal muscle strength, mass, and quality in older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006; 61: 1059-1064
67 Russ DW, Gregg-Cornell K, Conaway MJ. et al. Evolving concepts on the age-related changes in "muscle quality". J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 2012; 3: 95-109
68 Delmonico MJ, Harris TB, Visser M. et al. Longitudinal study of muscle strength, quality, and adipose tissue infiltration. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 1579-1585
69 Di Girolamo FG, Fiotti N, Milanović Z. et al. The aging muscle in experimental bed rest: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr 2021; 8: 633987
70 MacLennan RJ, Sahebi M, Becker N. et al. Declines in skeletal muscle quality vs. size following two weeks of knee joint immobilization. PeerJ 2020; 8: e8224
71 MacLennan RJ, Ogilvie D, McDorman J. et al. The time course of neuromuscular impairment during short-term disuse in young women. Physiol Rep 2021; 9: e14677
72 Correa-de-Araujo R, Harris-Love MO, Miljkovic I. et al. The need for standardized assessment of muscle quality in skeletal muscle function deficit and other aging-related muscle dysfunctions: A symposium report. Front Physiol 2017; 8: 87
73 Stock MS, Thompson BJ. Echo intensity as an indicator of skeletal muscle quality: applications, methodology, and future directions. Eur J Appl Physiol 2021; 121: 369-380
74 Pinto MD, Silveira Pinto R, Nosaka K. et al. Do intramuscular temperature and fascicle angle affect ultrasound echo intensity values. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2023; 55: 740-750
75 Arts IMP, Schelhaas HJ, Verrijp KCN. et al. Intramuscular fibrous tissue determines muscle echo intensity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Muscle Nerve 2012; 45: 449-450
76 Pillen S, Tak RO, Zwarts MJ. et al. Skeletal muscle ultrasound: Correlation between fibrous tissue and echo intensity. Ultrasound Med Biol 2009; 35: 443-446
77 Young H-J, Jenkins NT, Zhao Q. et al. Measurement of intramuscular fat by muscle echo intensity. Muscle Nerve 2015; 52: 963-971
78 Tanaka NI, Ogawa M, Yoshiko A. et al. Validity of extended-field-of-view ultrasound imaging to evaluate quantity and quality of trunk skeletal muscles. Ultrasound Med Biol 2021; 47: 376-385
79 Stock MS, Mota JA, Hernandez JM. et al. Echo intensity and muscle thickness as predictors of athleticism and isometric strength in middle-school boys. Muscle Nerve 2017; 55: 685-692
80 Komforti D, Joffe C, Magras A. et al. Does skeletal muscle morphology or functional performance better explain variance in fast gait speed in older adults. Aging Clin Exp Res 2021; 33: 921-931
81 Stock MS, Oranchuk DJ, Burton AM. et al. Age-, sex-, and region-specific differences in skeletal muscle size and quality. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2020; 45: 1253-1260
82 Wong V, Spitz RW, Bell ZW. et al. Exercise induced changes in echo intensity within the muscle: a brief review. J Ultrasound 2020; 23: 457-472
83 Dankel SJ, Abe T, Bell ZW. et al. The impact of ultrasound probe tilt on muscle thickness and echo-intensity: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Densitom 2020; 23: 630-638
84 Varanoske A, Coker N, Johnson B-A. et al. Effects of rest position on morphology of the vastus lateralis and its relationship with lower-body strength and power. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2019; 4: 64
85 Carr JC, Gerstner GR, Voskuil CC. et al. The influence of sonographer experience on skeletal muscle image acquisition and analysis. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2021; 6: 91
86 Girts RM, Harmon KK, Pagan JI. et al. The influence of ultrasound image depth and gain on skeletal muscle echo intensity. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2022; 47: 839-846
87 Seynnes OR, Cronin NJ. Simple Muscle Architecture Analysis (SMA): An ImageJ macro tool to automate measurements in B-mode ultrasound scans. PLoS One 2020; 15: e0229034
88 Ritsche P, Wirth P, Franchi MV. et al. ACSauto-semi-automatic assessment of human vastus lateralis and rectus femoris cross-sectional area in ultrasound images. Sci Rep 2021; 11: 13042
89 American College of Sports Medicine, Lohman T, Milliken LA. ACSM’s Body Composition Assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2019
90 Kasper AM, Langan-Evans C, Hudson JF. et al. Come back skinfolds, all is forgiven: A narrative review of the efficacy of common body composition methods in applied sports practice. Nutrients 2021; 13: 1075
91 Santos DA, Dawson JA, Matias CN. et al. Reference values for body composition and anthropometric measurements in athletes. PLoS One 2014; 9: e97846
92 Fukuda D. Assessments for Sport and Athletic Performance. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2019
93 Slater G, Woolford S. Assessment of Physique. In: Tanner RK, Gore CJ (eds), Australian Institute of Sport. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2013
94 Bonilla DA, De León LG, Alexander-Cortez P. et al. Simple anthropometry-based calculations to monitor body composition in athletes: Scoping review and reference values. Nutr Health 2022; 28: 95-109
95 Defreitas JM, Beck TW, Stock MS. et al. A comparison of techniques for estimating training-induced changes in muscle cross-sectional area. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 2382-2389
96 Moritani T, deVries HA. Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain. Am J Phys Med 1979; 58: 115-130
97 Housh DJ, Housh TJ, Weir JP. et al. Anthropometric estimation of thigh muscle cross-sectional area. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 784-791
98 Duarte CK, De Abreu Silva L, Castro CF. et al. Prediction equations to estimate muscle mass using anthropometric data: a systematic review. Nutr Rev 2023; 81: 1414-1440
99 Lukaski H, Raymond-Pope CJ. New frontiers of body composition in sport. Int J Sports Med 2021; 42: 588-601
100 Kim C-H, Park J-H, Kim H. et al. Modeling the human body shape in bioimpedance vector measurements. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010; 2010: 3872-3874
101 Di Vincenzo O, Marra M, Scalfi L. Bioelectrical impedance phase angle in sport: a systematic review. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2019; 16: 49
102 Cebrián-Ponce Á, Irurtia A, Carrasco-Marginet M. et al. Electrical impedance myography in health and physical exercise: A systematic review and future perspectives. Front Physiol 2021; 12: 740877
103 International Association for the Study of Pain. Terminology. Available from https://www.iasp-pain.org/resources/terminology/ Accessed: 13 November 2023
104 Cao Q-W, Peng B-G, Wang L. et al. Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of myofascial pain syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9: 2077-2089
105 Harden RN, Bruehl SP, Gass S. et al. Signs and symptoms of the myofascial pain syndrome: a national survey of pain management providers. Clin J Pain 2000; 16: 64-72
106 Li L, Stoop R, Clijsen R. et al. Criteria used for the diagnosis of myofascial trigger points in clinical trials on physical therapy: Updated systematic review. Clin J Pain 2020; 36: 955-967
107 Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Dommerholt J. International consensus on diagnostic criteria and clinical considerations of myofascial trigger points: A Delphi study. Pain Med 2018; 19: 142-150
108 Simons DG, Stolov WC. Microscopic features and transient contraction of palpable bands in canine muscle. Am J Phys Med 1976; 55: 65-88
109 Srbely JZ, Dickey JP, Bent LR. et al. Capsaicin-induced central sensitization evokes segmental increases in trigger point sensitivity in humans. J Pain 2010; 11: 636-643
110 Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L. et al. Reliability of physical examination for diagnosis of myofascial trigger points: a systematic review of the literature. Clin J Pain 2009; 25: 80-89
111 Wytrążek M, Huber J, Lipiec J. et al. Evaluation of palpation, pressure algometry, and electromyography for monitoring trigger points in young participants. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2015; 38: 232-243
112 Oliveira de AK, Dibai-Filho AV, Soleira G. et al. Reliability of pressure pain threshold on myofascial trigger points in the trapezius muscle of women with chronic neck pain. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) 2021; 67: 708-712
113 Mazza DF, Boutin RD, Chaudhari AJ. Assessment of myofascial trigger points via imaging: A systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 100: 1003-1014
114 Sikdar S, Shah JP, Gebreab T. et al. Novel applications of ultrasound technology to visualize and characterize myofascial trigger points and surrounding soft tissue. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009; 90: 1829-1838
115 Luiza da Silva Queiroz M, Bezerra Diniz PR, Nepomuceno Montenegro EJ. et al. MRI in migraineurs: are there abnormalities in the area where the myofascial trigger points are palpable and in volume measurements?. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2020; 24: 260-266