Quality of Life Outcomes after Free Fibula Flap Reconstruction of Mandibular Defects: A Longitudinal Examination

Abstract

Background A comprehensive understanding of changes in health-related quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery is necessary for effective preoperative counseling. The goal of this study was to perform a longitudinal analysis of postoperative quality of life outcomes after fibula free flap (FFF) mandible reconstruction.

Methods A retrospective review was performed for all patients who underwent oncologic mandible reconstruction with an FFF between 2000 and 2021. Completion of at least one postoperative FACE-Q questionnaire was necessary for inclusion. FACE-Q scores were divided into five time periods for analysis. Functional outcomes measured with speech language pathology (SLP) assessments and tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube status were analyzed at three time points.

Results One hundred and nine patients were included. Of these, 68 patients also had at least one SLP assessment. All outcomes as measured by the various FACE-Q scales did not improve significantly from the immediate postoperative time point to the last evaluated time point (p > 0.05). SLP functional outcomes showed some deterioration over time, but these were not significant (p > 0.05). The percentage of patients who required a tracheostomy (18 to 2%, p = 0.002) or gastrostomy tube (25 to 11%, p = 0.035) decreased significantly from the immediate postoperative time point to the last evaluated time point.

Conclusion Subjective quality of life outcomes do not change significantly with time after oncologic FFF mandible reconstruction. Reconstructive surgeons can use these results to help patients establish appropriate and achievable quality of life goals after surgery. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the impact of specific relevant clinical variables on postoperative quality of life.

Keywords

fibula free flap - quality of life - mandibulectomy

• References

• 1 Hidalgo DA. Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 84 (01) 71-79
• 2 Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Hidalgo DA, Hu QY. Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 104 (05) 1314-1320
• 3 Klesper B, Wahn J, Koebke J. Comparisons of bone volumes and densities relating to osseointegrated implants in microvascularly reconstructed mandibles: a study of cadaveric radius and fibula bones. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2000; 28 (02) 110-115
• 4 Beppu M, Hanel DP, Johnston GH, Carmo JM, Tsai TM. The osteocutaneous fibula flap: an anatomic study. J Reconstr Microsurg 1992; 8 (03) 215-223
• 5 Haddock NT, Hembd A. Peroneal vessels. In: Gurunian R, Djohan R. eds. Recipient Vessels in Reconstructive Microsurgery: Anatomy and Technical Considerations. Springer International Publishing; 2021: 233-238 . Cham. Switzerland.
• 6 Hidalgo DA. Aesthetic improvements in free-flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (04) 574-585 , discussion 586–587
• 7 Schusterman MA, Reece GP, Miller MJ, Harris S. The osteocutaneous free fibula flap: is the skin paddle reliable?. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90 (05) 787-793 , discussion 794–798
• 8 Sandoval ML, Rosen EB, Robert AJ, Nelson JA, Matros E, Gelblum DY. Immediate dental implants in fibula free flaps to reconstruct the mandible: a pilot study of the short-term effects on radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2020; 22 (01) 91-95
• 9 Urken ML, Buchbinder D, Weinberg H, Vickery C, Sheiner A, Biller HF. Primary placement of osseointegrated implants in microvascular mandibular reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989; 101 (01) 56-73
• 10 Momoh AO, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Liu S, Feng L, Hanasono MM. A prospective cohort study of fibula free flap donor-site morbidity in 157 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 (03) 714-720
• 11 Anthony JP, Rawnsley JD, Benhaim P, Ritter EF, Sadowsky SH, Singer MI. Donor leg morbidity and function after fibula free flap mandible reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1995; 96 (01) 146-152
• 12 Hatchell AC, Schrag CH, Temple-Oberle CF. et al. Patient-reported outcomes after fibula free flap harvest: a pilot study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021; 148 (06) 1007e-1011e
• 13 Petrovic I, Baser R, Blackwell T. et al. Long-term functional and esthetic outcomes after fibula free flap reconstruction of the mandible. Head Neck 2019; 41 (07) 2123-2132
• 14 Allen Jr RJ, Nelson JA, Polanco TO. et al. Short-term outcomes following virtual surgery-assisted immediate dental implant placement in free fibula flaps for oncologic mandibular reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (06) 768e-776e
• 15 Sharaf B, Levine JP, Hirsch DL, Bastidas JA, Schiff BA, Garfein ES. Importance of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology in the multidisciplinary approach to head and neck reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2010; 21 (04) 1277-1280
• 16 Matros E, Albornoz CR, Rensberger M, Weimer K, Garfein ES. Computer-assisted design and computer-assisted modeling technique optimization and advantages over traditional methods of osseous flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (05) 289-296
• 17 Cohen WA, Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG. et al. Health-related quality of life following reconstruction for common head and neck surgical defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (06) 1312-1320
• 18 Rogers SN, Lowe D, Fisher SE, Brown JS, Vaughan ED. Health-related quality of life and clinical function after primary surgery for oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 40 (01) 11-18
• 19 Villaret AB, Cappiello J, Piazza C, Pedruzzi B, Nicolai P. Quality of life in patients treated for cancer of the oral cavity requiring reconstruction: a prospective study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital 2008; 28 (03) 120-125
• 20 Cracchiolo JR, Klassen AF, Young-Afat DA. et al. Leveraging patient-reported outcomes data to inform oncology clinical decision making: Introducing the FACE-Q Head and Neck Cancer Module. Cancer 2019; 125 (06) 863-872
• 21 Pusic A, Liu JC, Chen CM. et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 136 (04) 525-535
• 22 Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Snell L. et al. Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2012; 12 (02) 149-158
• 23 Ho AL, Klassen AF, Cano S, Scott AM, Pusic AL. Optimizing patient-centered care in breast reconstruction: the importance of preoperative information and patient-physician communication. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013; 132 (02) 212e-220e
• 24 Huang K, Przeslawski C, Ramirez CA. What risk factors are associated with poorer quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2023; 81 (05) 648-653
• 25 Hu ZY, Feng XQ, Fu MR, Yu R, Zhao HL. Symptom patterns, physical function and quality of life among head and neck cancer patients prior to and after surgical treatment: a prospective study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2020; 46: 101770
• 26 Citak E, Tulek Z. Longitudinal quality of life in Turkish patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21 (08) 2171-2183
• 27 Sroussi HY, Jessri M, Epstein J. Oral assessment and management of the patient with head and neck cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2018; 30 (04) 445-458
• 28 Kao SS, Peters MD, Krishnan SG, Ooi EH. Swallowing outcomes following primary surgical resection and primary free flap reconstruction for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas: a systematic review. Laryngoscope 2016; 126 (07) 1572-1580
• 29 Panchal H, Shamsunder MG, Petrovic I. et al. Dental implant survival in vascularized bone flaps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146 (03) 637-648
• 30 Harris D, Höfer S, O'Boyle CA. et al. A comparison of implant-retained mandibular overdentures and conventional dentures on quality of life in edentulous patients: a randomized, prospective, within-subject controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24 (01) 96-103
• 31 Schiegnitz E, Müller LK, Sagheb K. et al. Clinical long-term and patient-reported outcomes of dental implants in oral cancer patients. Int J Implant Dent 2021; 7 (01) 93
• 32 Cohen Z, Graziano FD, Shamsunder MG. et al. Miniplate versus reconstruction bar fixation for oncologic mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 2024; 40 (02) 87-95
• 33 Kurlander DE, Garvey PB, Largo RD. et al. The cost utility of virtual surgical planning and computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing in mandible reconstruction using the free fibula osteocutaneous flap. J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39 (03) 221-230
• 34 Rogers SN, D'Souza JJ, Lowe D, Kanatas A. Longitudinal evaluation of health-related quality of life after osteoradionecrosis of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 53 (09) 854-857
• 35 Zavalishina L, Karra N, Zaid WS, El-Hakim M. Quality of life assessment in patients after mandibular resection and free fibula flap reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 72 (08) 1616-1626
• 36 Löfstrand J, Nyberg M, Karlsson T. et al. Quality of life after free fibula flap reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (02) 108-120
• 37 Hölzle F, Kesting MR, Hölzle G. et al. Clinical outcome and patient satisfaction after mandibular reconstruction with free fibula flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 36 (09) 802-806
• 38 Voineskos SH, Klassen AF, Cano SJ, Pusic AL, Gibbons CJ. Giving meaning to differences in BREAST-Q scores: minimal important difference for breast reconstruction patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (01) 11e-20e