Technik und Studienlage der laparoskopischen Gastrektomie bei Magenkarzinom

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Ziel dieser Arbeit war es, die Technik einer laparoskopischen Gastrektomie bei Magenkarzinom darzustellen sowie in einem Review die aktuelle internationale Studienlage zu diesem Thema zusammenzufassen.

Materialien und Methoden

Im 1. Teil wird eine laparoskopische Standardgastrektomie bei Karzinom beschrieben und dokumentiert. Im 2. Teil werden nach einer EMBASE- und PubMed-Suche aus primär 3042 Treffern durch systematisches Eingrenzen insgesamt 123 qualitätsrelevante randomisierte (RCT) und nicht randomisierte (non-RCT) Studien zur laparoskopischen Gastrektomie identifiziert. Danach werden die Studienergebnisse konklusiv für die Zielkriterien Durchführbarkeit, Outcome, onkologische Qualität sowie Morbidität und Mortalität zusammengefasst.

Ergebnisse

Sowohl die laparoskopisch subtotale Resektion bei distalen Magenkarzinomen wie auch die laparoskopische Gastrektomie sind inzwischen sicher und komplikationsarm durchführbar. In einem aktuellen Literaturreview über insgesamt 15 RCT mit 5576 Patienten (laparoskopisch 2793 vs. offen 2756) ergaben sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede in Bezug auf Durchführbarkeit, intraoperatives Outcome und onkologische Qualität (R0-Status und Lymphknotenausbeute). Die chirurgische Morbidität und Mortalität waren vergleichbar. Patienten nach laparoskopischer Operation zeigten eine signifikant schnellere frühpostoperative Erholung mit einer geringeren Gesamtmorbidität. Im Gegensatz dazu war die Operationszeit im Vergleich zur offenen Technik um durchschnittlich 45 min signifikant verlängert. Die Vorteile der laparoskopischen Technik bildeten sich in Studien zum Magenfrühkarzinom und bei fortgeschrittenen Karzinomen (>T2) gleichermaßen ab.

Schlussfolgerung

Die laparoskopische Gastrektomie bei Magenkarzinom ist sicher durchführbar und zeigt eine bessere frühpostoperative Erholung. Komplikationsraten, Morbidität und Mortalität sowie onkologische Langzeitergebnisse sind mit der offenen Chirurgie vergleichbar.

Abstract

Background

The aim of this paper was to describe the technique of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma and to present a review of current international studies on this topic.

Materials and Methods

The first part describes and documents a standard laparoscopic gastrectomy for carcinoma. In the second part, after an EMBASE and PubMed search, a total of 123 quality-relevant randomised (RCT) and non-randomised (non-RCT) studies on laparoscopic gastrectomy are identified from a primary total of 3,042 hits by systematic narrowing. The study results are then summarised conclusively for the target criteria of feasibility, outcome, oncological quality, morbidity and mortality.

Results

Both, laparoscopic subtotal resection for distal gastric carcinomas and laparoscopic gastrectomy can now be performed safely and with few complications. In a recent literature review of a total of 15 RCTs with 5,576 patients (laparoscopic 2,793 vs. open 2,756), there were no significant differences in terms of feasibility, intraoperative outcome and oncological quality (R0 and lymph node harvest). Surgical morbidity and mortality were comparable. Patients after laparoscopic surgery showed a significantly faster early postoperative recovery with a lower overall morbidity. In contrast, the operating time was significantly longer – by a mean of 45 min – compared to the open technique. The advantages of the laparoscopic technique were equally evident in studies on early gastric carcinoma and advanced carcinomas (>T2).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma is safe to perform and shows better early postoperative recovery. Complication rates, morbidity and mortality as well as long-term oncological results are comparable with open surgery.

Schlüsselwörter

laparoskopische Gastrektomie - Magenkarzinom - Review

Keywords

laparoscopic gastrectomy - gastric cancer - review

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 07. Dezember 2023

Angenommen: 24. Januar 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. Februar 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I. et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424
• 2 Moehler M, Al-Batran SE, Andus T. et al. S3-Leitlinie Magenkarzinom – Diagnostik und Therapie der Adenokarzinome des Magens und ösophagogastralen Übergangs. Langversion 2.0 – August 2019. AWMF-Registernummer: 032/009OL. Z Gastroenterol 2019; 57: 1517-1632
• 3 Best LMJ, Mughal M, Gurusamy KS. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 3: CD011389
• 4 Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K. et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery 2002; 131(1 Suppl): S306-S311
• 5 Hayashi H, Ochiai T, Shimada H. et al. Prospective randomized study of open versus laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with extraperigastric lymph node dissection for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 1172-1176
• 6 Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 168-173
• 7 Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S. et al. Laparoscopy versus open distal gastrectomy by expert surgeons for early gastric cancer in Japanese patients: short-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 1695-1705
• 8 Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Yamasaki M. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy versus open distal gastrectomy. A prospective randomized single-blind study. World J Surg 2013; 37: 2379-2386
• 9 Yamashita K, Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in Japan: long-term clinical outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. Surg Today 2016; 46: 741-749
• 10 Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU. et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg 2016; 263: 28-35
• 11 Katai H, Mizusawa J, Katayama H. et al. Short-term surgical outcomes from a phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0912. Gastric Cancer 2017; 20: 699-708
• 12 Huscher CGS, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G. et al. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 232-237
• 13 Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y. et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2016; 34: 1350-1357
• 14 Park YK, Yoon HM, Kim YW. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results from a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial (COACT 1001). Ann Surg 2018; 267: 638-645
• 15 Li Z, Shan F, Ying XJ. et al. Assessment of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg 2019; 154: 1093-1101
• 16 Wang Z, Xing J, Cai J. et al. Short-term surgical outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer in North China: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 2019; 33: 33-45
• 17 Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Park YK. et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the KLASS-02-RCT randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38: 3304-3313
• 18 Sakamoto T, Fujiogi M, Matsui H. et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a nationwide retrospective cohort analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27: 518-526
• 19 Brenkman HJF, Gisbertz SS, Slaman AE. et al. Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy during the early introduction of minimally invasive gastrectomy in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study. Ann Surg 2017; 266: 831-838
• 20 Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM), University of Oxford. OCEBM Levels of Evidence. Zugriff am 11. Februar 2024 unter: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence
• 21 Guzman EA, Pigazzi A, Lee B. et al. Totally laparoscopic gastric resection with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 2218-2223
• 22 Kim YW, Yoon HM, Yun YH. et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: result of a randomized controlled trial (COACT 0301). Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 4267-4276
• 23 Kim MG, Kim BS, Kim TH. et al. The effects of laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy on surgical outcomes in the treatment of gastric cancer. J Korean Surg Soc 2011; 80: 245-250
• 24 Usui S, Yoshida T, Ito K. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: comparison with conventional open total gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005; 15: 309-314
• 25 Inokuchi M, Otsuki S, Fujimori Y. et al. Systematic review of anastomotic complications of esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 9656-9665
• 26 Topal B, Leys E, Ectors N. et al. Determinants of complications and adequacy of surgical resection in laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 980-984
• 27 Chouillard E, Gumbs AA, Meyer F. et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma: a prospective comparative analysis. Minerva Chir 2010; 65: 243-250
• 28 Hiki N, Katai H, Mizusawa J. et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703). Gastric Cancer 2018; 21: 155-161
• 29 Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC. et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01). J Korean Surg Soc 2013; 84: 123-130
• 30 Mochiki E, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K. et al. Laparoscopically assisted total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for upper and middle gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1997-2002
• 31 Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW. et al. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. BJS 2015; 102: 1500-1505
• 32 Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T. et al. A multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 2015; 39: 2734-2741
• 33 Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y. et al. Effect of laparoscopic vs open distal gastrectomy on 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: the CLASS-01 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2019; 321: 1983-1992
• 34 Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M. et al. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994; 4: 146-148
• 35 Inokuchi M, Nakagawa M, Tanioka T. et al. Long- and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy in patients with clinically and pathological locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity-score matching analysis. Surg Endosc 2018; 32: 735-742
• 36 Ludwig K, Schneider-Koriath S, Scharlau U. et al. Laparoskopische vs. konventionell-offene D2-Gastrektomie bei Magenkarzinom: eine Matched-Pair-Analyse. Zentralbl Chir 2018; 143: 145-154
• 37 Cianchi F, Qirici E, Trallori G. et al. Totally laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a matched cohort study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2013; 23: 117-122
• 38 An JY, Heo GU, Cheong JH. et al. Assessment of open versus laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy in lymph node-positive early gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort analysis. J Surg Oncol 2010; 102: 77-81
• 39 Allemani C, Matsuda T, Di Carlo V. et al. Global surveillance of trends in cancer survival 2000–14 (CONCORD-3): analysis of individual records for 37 513 025 patients diagnosed with one of 18 cancers from 322 population-based registries in 71 countries. Lancet 2018; 391: 1023-1075
• 40 Strong VE, Song KY, Park CH. et al. Comparison of gastric cancer survival following R0 resection in the United States and Korea using an internationally validated nomogram. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 640-646
• 41 Siani LM, Ferranti F, De Carlo A. et al. Completely laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy in stage I-III/C gastric cancer: safety, efficacy and five-year oncologic outcome. Minerva Chir 2012; 67: 319-326
• 42 Fang C, Hua J, Li J. et al. Comparison of long-term results between laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy and open gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Am J Surg 2014; 208: 391-396
• 43 Shinohara T, Satoh S, Kanaya S. et al. Laparoscopic versus open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2013; 27: 286-294
• 44 Kinoshita T, Uyama I, Terashima M. et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery for clinical stage II/III gastric cancer: a multicenter cohort study in Japan (LOC-A Study). Ann Surg 2019; 269: 887-894