Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-0098
Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy Access Point: Prospective Comparison of Sonographic and Palpatory Detection – Which Method is Better for Novices?

Abstract
Purpose Arthroscopy is one of the most common interventions in orthopedics. Hence it is important to train users early in order to ensure the safest possible identification of access portals (AP). This prospective study aimed to compare a palpatory (PalpMethod) with a sonographic (SonoMethod) method for AP location in the shoulder and knee joints.
Materials and Methods The study included trainee doctors (n=68) attending workshops (lasting approx. 90 minutes). In these workshops a teaching video initially demonstrated the PalpMethod and SonoMethod of AP identification. An experienced operator first marked the access portals on the test subject with a UV pen (determined ideal point [DIP]). Adhesive film was then affixed to the puncture regions. Subsequently participants marked on shoulders and knees first the point determined by palpation, then the point determined by sonography. Analysis involved DIP visualization with a UV lamp and employed a coordinate system around the central DIP. In addition, participants completed an evaluation before and after the workshop.
Results The analysis included 324 measurements (n=163 shoulders and n= 161 knees). The majority of participants had not previously attended any courses on manual examination (87.9%) or musculoskeletal ultrasound (93.9%). Overall, the markings participants made on the shoulder using the SonoMethod were significantly closer to the DIP than those made by the PalpMethod (Palp 18.8mm ± 14.5mm vs. Sono 11.2mm ± 7.2mm; p<0.001). On the knee, however, the markings made by the PalpMethod were significantly closer to the DIP overall (Palp 8.0mm ± 3.2mm vs. Sono 12.8mm ± 5.2mm; p<0.001). Conclusion The results show that the SonoMethod produces more accurate markings on the shoulder, while the PalpMethod is superior for the knee.
Keywords
musculoskeletal ultrasound - arthroscopy - ultrasound-guided procedure - knee joint - shoulder joint‡ These authors contributed equally to this work and share first-authorship.
* These authors contributed equally to this work and share senior authorship.
Publication History
Received: 06 November 2023
Accepted after revision: 03 February 2024
Article published online:
04 April 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
Andreas Michael Weimer, Johannes M. Weimer, Svenja Berthold, Stephan Stein, Lukas Müller, Holger Buggenhagen, Gerd Balser, Kay Stankov, Mirco Sgroi, Gerhard Schmidmaier, Roman Kloeckner, Christian Schamberger. Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopy Access Point: Prospective Comparison of Sonographic and Palpatory Detection – Which Method is Better for Novices?. Ultrasound Int Open 2024; 10: a22710098.
DOI: 10.1055/a-2271-0098
-
References
- 1
Kouk S.
The Evolution of Arthroscopy A Historical Perspective. Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013) 2021;
79: 23-29
MissingFormLabel
- 2 Bundesamt S. Die 20 häufigsten Operationen insgesamt 2022 [cited 2023 06.04].
Available from: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Gesundheit/Krankenhaeuser/Tabellen/drg-operationen-insgesamt.html
MissingFormLabel
- 3
Martin KD,
Patterson DP,
Cameron KL.
Arthroscopic Training Courses Improve Trainee Arthroscopy Skills: A
Simulation-Based Prospective Trial. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 2228-2232
MissingFormLabel
- 4
Paxton ES,
Backus J,
Keener J,
Brophy RH.
Shoulder arthroscopy: basic principles of positioning, anesthesia, and portal
anatomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2013; 21: 332-342
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Mayr HO,
Stoehr A.
[Complications of knee arthroscopy]. Orthopade. 2016; 45: 4-12
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Moen TC,
Rudolph GH,
Caswell K,
Espinoza C,
Burkhead WZ,
Krishnan SG.
Complications of shoulder arthroscopy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014; 22: 410-419
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Mehta P,
Rand EB,
Visco CJ,
Wyss J.
Resident Accuracy of Musculoskeletal Palpation With Ultrasound Verification. J Ultrasound
Med 2018; 37: 1719-1724
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Rho ME,
Chu SK,
Yang A,
Hameed F,
Lin CY,
Hurh PJ.
Resident accuracy of joint line palpation using ultrasound verification. Pm r 2014;
6: 920-925
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Claessen F,
Kachooei AR,
Kolovich GP,
Buijze GA,
Oh LS,
van den Bekerom MPJ.
et al. Portal placement in elbow arthroscopy by novice surgeons: cadaver study. Knee
Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2017; 25: 2247-2254
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Weinrauch P,
Kermeci S.
Ultrasound-assisted hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech 2014; 3: e255-e259
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Prenaud C,
Loubeyre J,
Soubeyrand M.
Decompression of the suprascapular nerve at the suprascapular notch under
combined arthroscopic and ultrasound guidance. Scientific Reports 2021; 11: 18906
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Hua Y,
Yang Y,
Chen S,
Wang Y,
Li Y,
Chen J.
et al. Ultrasound-guided establishment of hip arthroscopy portals. Arthroscopy 2009;
25: 1491-1495
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Mhaskar VA,
Agrahari H,
Maheshwari J.
Ultrasound guided arthroscopic meniscus surgery. J Ultrasound 2023; 26: 577-581
MissingFormLabel
- 14
van Loon FHJ,
Buise MP,
Claassen JJF,
Dierick-van Daele ATM,
Bouwman ARA.
Comparison of ultrasound guidance with palpation and direct visualisation for
peripheral vein cannulation in adult patients: a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121: 358-366
MissingFormLabel
- 15
Sage W,
Pickup L,
Smith TO,
Denton ER,
Toms AP.
The clinical and functional outcomes of ultrasound-guided vs landmark-guided
injections for adults with shoulder pathology – a systematic review and
meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013; 52: 743-751
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Patel DN,
Nayyar S,
Hasan S,
Khatib O,
Sidash S,
Jazrawi LM.
Comparison of ultrasound-guided versus blind glenohumeral injections: a
cadaveric study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2012; 21: 1664-1668
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Kumar V,
Rajnish RK.
Knee Examination. In: Dhatt SS, Prabhakar S, editors. Handbook of Clinical
Examination in Orthopedics: An Illustrated Guide. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019.
p 247-254
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Prabhakar S,
Syam K.
Shoulder Examination. In: Dhatt SS, Prabhakar S, editors. Handbook of Clinical
Examination in Orthopedics: An Illustrated Guide. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2019.
p 53-132
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Dienst M,
Kohn D.
Grundlagen der Kniearthroskopie. In: Pfeil J, Siebert W, Janousek A, Josten C,
editors. Minimal-invasive Verfahren in der Orthopädie und Traumatologie. Berlin, Heidelberg:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2000. p 179-184
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Bachmann CE,
Gruber G,
Konermann W,
Arnold A,
Gruber GM,
Ueberle F.
et al. Ultrasound Examination — Standard Ultrasound Cross Sectional Planes (DEGUM
Recommendations). In: Bachmann CE, Gruber G, Konermann W, Arnold A, Gruber GM,
Ueberle F, et al., editors. ESWT and Ultrasound Imaging of the Musculoskeletal
System. Heidelberg: Steinkopff; 2001. p 37-55
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Cicak N,
Matasović T,
Bajraktarević T.
Ultrasonographic guidance of needle placement for shoulder arthrography. J Ultrasound
Med 1992; 11: 135-137
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Konermann W,
Gruber G.
Ultraschalldiagnostik der Bewegungsorgane: Kursbuch nach den Richtlinien der
DEGUM und der DGOU. Georg Thieme Verlag; 2011
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Walrod BJ,
Schroeder A,
Conroy MJ,
Boucher LC,
Bockbrader M,
Way DP.
et al. Does Ultrasound-Enhanced Instruction of Musculoskeletal Anatomy Improve Physical
Examination Skills of First-Year Medical Students?. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37: 225-232
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Gazzillo GP,
Finnoff JT,
Hall MM,
Sayeed YA,
Smith J.
Accuracy of palpating the long head of the biceps tendon: an ultrasonographic
study. Pm r 2011; 3: 1035-1040
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Gaudreault N,
Lebel K,
Bédard S,
Daigle F,
Venne G,
Balg F.
Using ultrasound imaging to assess novice physiotherapy students' ability
to locate musculoskeletal structures with palpation. Physiotherapy. 2021; 113: 53-60
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Meyer M,
Graveleau N,
Hardy P,
Landreau P.
Anatomic risks of shoulder arthroscopy portals: anatomic cadaveric study of 12
portals. Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 529-536
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Lin JS,
Gimarc DC,
Adler RS,
Beltran LS,
Merkle AN.
Ultrasound-Guided Musculoskeletal Injections. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2021; 25:
769-784
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Amoo-Achampong K,
Nwachukwu BU,
McCormick F.
An orthopedist’s guide to shoulder ultrasound: a systematic review of
examination protocols. The Physician and Sportsmedicine 2016; 44: 407-416
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Gillman LM,
Kirkpatrick AW.
Portable bedside ultrasound: the visual stethoscope of the 21st century. Scand J Trauma
Resusc Emerg Med 2012; 20: 18
MissingFormLabel
- 30 AGA. Ausbildung www.aga-online.ch: Gesellschaft für Arthroskopie und
Gelenkchirurgie; 2023 [cited 2023 02.06]. Available from: https://www.aga-online.ch/ausbildung/
MissingFormLabel
- 31
Alomar AZ.
Undergraduate Medical Students' Perceptions of an Online Audio-Visual-Based
Module for Teaching Musculoskeletal Physical Examination Skills. J Med Educ Curric
Dev 2022; 9 23821205221078794
MissingFormLabel
- 32
Blechschmidt V,
Recker F.
Representation of sonographic learning objectives in the NKLM 2.0. Ultraschall Med
2022; 43: 30
MissingFormLabel
- 33
Weimer JM,
Rink M,
Müller L,
Dirks K,
Ille C,
Bozzato A.
et al. Development and Integration of DOPS as Formative Tests in Head and Neck
Ultrasound Education: Proof of Concept Study for Exploration of Perceptions. Diagnostics.
2023; 13: 661
MissingFormLabel
- 34
Murphy RF,
LaPorte DM,
Wadey VM.
Musculoskeletal education in medical school: deficits in knowledge and
strategies for improvement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 2009-2014
MissingFormLabel