Download PDF
DO - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Osteopathie 2024; 22(03): 29-36
DOI: 10.1055/a-2274-4314
Spektrum | interdisziplinär

Osteopathie und evidenzbasierte Medizin, Teil 3: Bedeutung der EBM für die Osteopathie

Dirk Luthin
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Teil 3 der Beitragsreihe zur evidenzbasierten Medizin (EBM) befasst sich mit der Frage der Übertragbarkeit und Anwendbarkeit der EBM auf die Osteopathie. Hierzu werden die Ideen der EBM Working Group mit den Ideen Stills verglichen, die derzeitige Osteopathie kritisch bewertet und schließlich einige Gedanken für eine Ausrichtung der Osteopathie der Zukunft formuliert.

Schlüsselwörter

Evidenzbasierte Medizin - Osteopathie und EBM


Publication History

Article published online:
03 July 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 8. Aufl. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2019
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH, Ashcroft RE. Epistemologic inquiries in evidence-based medicine. Cancer Control 2009; 16: 158-168
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Still AT. Autobiographie. In: Hartmann C. Das große Still-Kompendium. 2. Aufl. Pähl: Jolandos; 2002: 65-66
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Walter GW. Der erste D.O. Dr. Andrew Taylor Still. In: Hartmann C. Erinnerungen an Andrew Taylor Still. Pähl: Jolandos; 2016: 49
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Still AT. Forschung und Praxis. In: Hartmann C. Das große Still-Kompendium. 2. Aufl. Pähl: Jolandos; 2005: 19-65
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Still AT. Forschung und Praxis. In: Hartmann C. Das große Still-Kompendium. 2. Aufl. Pähl: Jolandos; 2005: 6-11
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Littlejohn JM. Ansprache zur Postgraduiertenklasse 1899 an der American School of Osteopathy, Kirksville. Journal of Osteopathy (V):421-431. In: Hartmann C. Das große Littlejohn-Kompendium. Pähl: Jolandos; 2009
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Guyatt GH, Haynes B. Jaeschke et al. The philosophy of evidence-based medicine. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature. 3. Aufl. New York: McGraw Hill; 2014
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Bastian H, Glasziou P, Chalmers I. Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000326
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Cabanillas-Barea S, Jiménez-Del-Barrio S, Carrasco-Uribarren A. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis showed that complementary and alternative medicines were not effective for infantile colic. Acta Paediatr 2023; 112: 1378-1388
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Franke H, Prediger G. Und die Osteopathie wirkt doch! Eine Entgegnung zu dem Artikel „Dreimonatskoliken: Alternativmedizin ohne nachgewiesenen Effekt“ von Elke Oberhofer. Osteopath Med 2023; 24: 42-44
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Franke H, Franke JD, Fryer G. Effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment for pediatric conditions: A systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2022; 31: 113-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 www.foerderverein-osteopathie.de; Stand: 14.09.2023
  • 14 www.d-os.de Stand: 13.09.2023
  • 15 www.comecollaboration.org Stand: 14.09.2023
  • 16 Kaiser T. Wir müssen zu einer besseren Evidenzgenerierung kommen. Interview mit Dr. Thomas Kaiser. Dtsch Arztebl 2023; 120: A1464-A1468
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Altman DG. The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 1994; 308: 283-284
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Moustgaard H, Clayton GL, Jones HE. et al. Impact of blinding on estimated treatment effects in randomised clinical trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ 2020; 368: l6802
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Worral J. Why There’s No Cause to Randomize. Brit J Phil Sci 2007; 58: 451-488
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 20 La Caze A. The Randomized Controlled Trial: Internal and External Validity. In: Solomon M, Simon JR, Kincaid H. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. New York: Taylor and Francis; 2017: 195-208
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Worrall J. What Evidence in Evidence-Based Medicine?. Philos Sci 2002; 69: 316-330
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Urbach P. The value of randomization and control in clinical trials. Stat Med 1993; 12: 1421-1431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Berwick DM. Broadening the view of evidence-based medicine. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 315-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brock WA, Nolan KM, Nolan TW. Pragmatic science: accelerating the improvement of critical care. New Horiz 1998; 6: 61-68
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Eichler M, Pokora R, Schwentner L. et al. Evidenzbasierte Medizin: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. Dtsch Arztebl. 2015 112. A2190-A2192
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Smith R. Thoughts for new medical students at a new medical school. BMJ 2003; 327: 1430-1433
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Hall JC, Platell C. Half-life of truth in surgical literature. Lancet 1997; 350: 1752
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Poynard T, Munteanu M, Ratziu V. et al. Truth survival in clinical research: an evidence-based requiem?. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 888-895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Sauerland S, Waffenschmidt S. Welche Halbwertszeit hat medizinisches Wissen?. KVH-Journal 2018; 6: 20-22
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Shekelle PG, Ortiz E, Rhodes S. et al. Validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality clinical practice guidelines: how quickly do guidelines become outdated?. JAMA 2001; 286: 1461-1467
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Alderson LJ, Alderson P, Tan T. Median life span of a cohort of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guidelines was about 60 months. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 52-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Graesser AC, Fiore SM, Greiff S. et al. Advancing the science of collaborative problem solving. Psychol Sci Public Interest 2018; 19: 59-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Antes G. Evidence-Based Medicine. Der Internist 1998; 39: 899-908
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Draper-Rodi J, Vaucher P, Hohenschurz-Schmidt D. et al. 4 M's to make sense of evidence – Avoiding the propagation of mistakes, misinterpretation, misrepresentation and misinformation. Int J Osteopath Med 2022; 44: 29-35
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Ioannidis JPA. All science should inform policy and regulation. PLoS Med 2018; 15: e1002576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Blum HE. Eine vorsätzliche, gut gemachte Fälschung kann man nicht erkennen. Pressemitteilung von der 79. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie am 04.04.2013. https://dgk.org/daten/Blum_Herausgeber.pdf Stand: 12.11.2023
    Google Scholar
  • 37 Cerritelli F, Iacopini A, Galli M. et al. Evidence-based practice among Italian osteopaths: a national cross-sectional survey. BMC Complement Med Ther 2021; 21: 252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Leach MJ, Shaw R, Austin P. et al. Attitudes, skills, and use of evidence-based practice: A cross-sectional survey of Swedish osteopaths. Int J Osteopath Med 2020; 38: 41-49
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Leach MJ, Sundberg T, Fryer G. et al. An investigation of Australian osteopaths' attitudes, skills and utilisation of evidence-based practice: a national cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19: 498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sundberg T, Leach MJ, Thomson OP. et al. Attitudes, skills and use of evidence-based practice among UK osteopaths: a national cross-sectional survey. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19: 439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ramírez-Vélez R, Bagur-Calafat MC, Correa-Bautista JE. et al. Barriers against incorporating evidence-based practice in physical therapy in Colombia: current state and factors associated. BMC Med Educ 2015; 15: 220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Critical Appraisals Skills Programme. CASP Checklists https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ Stand: 13.09.2023
  • 43 https://ostlib.de/; Stand: 13.09.2023
  • 44 Pastor-Pons I, Hidalgo-García C, Lucha-López MO. et al. Effectiveness of pediatric integrative manual therapy in cervical movement limitation in infants with positional plagiocephaly: a randomized controlled trial. Ital J Pediatr 2021; 47: 41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Hart D. Evidenz-basierte Medizin (EBM) und Gesundheitsrecht. Überlegungen zu rechtlichen Konsequenzen der Verwissenschaftlichung der Medizin. Medizinrecht 2000; 18: 1-5
    Google Scholar
  • 46 Vogd W. Professionalisierungsschub oder Auflösung ärztlicher Autonomie. Die Bedeutung von Evidence Based Medicine und der neuen funktionalen Eliten in der Medizin aus system- und interaktionstheoretischer Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 2002; 31: 294-315
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Thomson OP, Petty NJ, Moore AP. A qualitative grounded theory study of the conceptions of clinical practice in osteopathy – a continuum from technical rationality to professional artistry. Man Ther 2014; 19: 37-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Howell JD. The paradox of osteopathy. N Engl J Med 1999; 341: 1465-1468
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Rumney IC. The History of the developmental term ’somatic dysfunction’. Osteopathic Annals 1979; 7: 26-30
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Esteves JE, Zegarra-Parodi R, van Dun R. et al. Models and theoretical frameworks for osteopathic care – A critical view and call for updates and research. Int J Osteopath Med 2020; 35: 1-4
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Moran R. Somatic dysfunction – conceptually fascinating, but does it help us address health needs?. Int J Osteopath Med 2016; 22: 1-2
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Wührl P. Den Fluch der somatischen Dysfunktion überwinden. DO 2011; 9: 35-37
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Fryer G. Somatic dysfunction: an osteopathic conundrum. Int J Osteopath Med 2016; 22: 52-63
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Zegarra-Parodi R, Draper-Rodi J, Haxton J. et al. The Native American heritage of the body-mind-spirit paradigm in osteopathic principles and practices. Int J Osteopath Med 2019; 33: 31-37
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Thomson OP, Mac Millan A. Commentary. What’s wrong with osteopathy?. Int J Osteopath Med 2023; 48: 100659
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Stilwell P, Harman K. An enactive approach to pain: Beyond the biopsychosocial model. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 2019; 18: 637-665
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Zegarra-Parodi R, Draper-Rodi J, Cerritelli F. Refining the Biopsychosocial Model for Musculoskeletal Practice by Introducing Religion and Spirituality Dimensions into the Clinical Scenario. Int J Osteopath Med 2019; 32: 44-48
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making--pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 780-781
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Bonelli J. Sinnorientierte Medizin. Imago Hominis 2004; 11: 251-264
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Nawroth PP. Krise der modernen Heilkunst: Mehr sinnorientiere Medizin wagen. Tagesspiegel 31.01.2020. www.tagesspiegel.de/wissen/mehr-sinnorientiere-medizin-wagen-4134739.html Stand: 13.09.2023
    Google Scholar
  • 61 Vaughan B, Fleischmann M. A guide to writing a case report of an osteopathic patient. Int J Osteopath Med 2020; 37: 34-39
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Riley DS, Barber MS, Kienle GS. et al. CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 89: 218-235
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Green BN, Johnson CD. How to write a case report for publication. J Chiropr Med 2006; 5: 72-82
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 White A, Ernst E. The case for uncontrolled clinical trials: a starting point for the evidence base for CAM. Complement Ther Med 2001; 9: 111-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Morin C, Gaboury I. Osteopathic empirical research: a bibliometric analysis from 1966 to 2018. BMC Complement Med Ther 2021; 21: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Vogel S, Draper-Rodi J. The importance of pilot studies, how to write them and what they mean. Int J Osteopath Med 2017; 23: 2-3
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Wieringa S, Greenhalgh T. 10 years of mindlines: a systematic review and commentary. Implement Sci 2015; 10: 45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed ’mindlines’? Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. BMJ 2004; 329: 1013
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Liem T, Neuhuber W. Kritik an der Polyvagaltheorie. DO 2021; 19: 34-37
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Schalkhaußer A. Schließung und Mobilität der Synchondrosis sphenobasilaris. DO-Arbeit. 2000 COE
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Lakatos I. Proofs and Refutations – The Logic of Mathematical Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University; 1976
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Box GEP, Draper NR. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Skogen MD, Ji R, Akimova A, Daewel U. et al. Disclosing the truth: Are models better than observations?. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 2021; 680: 7-13
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Steele JM. Models: Masterpieces and Lame Excuses. www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu/~steele/Rants/ModelsMandLE.html; Stand 13: 09 2023;
  • 75 Gelman A. Some thoughts on the saying, All models are wrong, but some are useful. https://statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2008/06/12/all_models_are/ Stand: 13.09.2023
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Bhise V, Rajan SS, Sittig DF. et al. Defining and Measuring Diagnostic Uncertainty in Medicine: A Systematic Review. J Gen Intern Med 2018; 33: 103-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Luthin D. Wie viel Differenzialdiagnostik braucht die Osteopathie?. DO 2012; 10: 22-23
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Logan RL, Scott PJ. Uncertainty in clinical practice: implications for quality and costs of health care. Lancet 1996; 347: 595-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Bublack R. Offene Kommunikation schafft Vertrauen. Interview mit Prof. Klaus Weckberger. MMW Fortschr Med 2023; 165: 14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Kassirer JP. Our stubborn quest for diagnostic certainty. A cause of excessive testing. N Engl J Med 1989; 320: 1489-1491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Oskamp S. Overconfidence in case-study judgments. Journal of Consulting Psychology 29: 261-265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B. Do those who know more also know more about how much they know? Organizational Behavior &. Human Performance 1977; 20: 159-183
    Google Scholar
  • 83 Moskowitz AJ, Kuipers BJ, Kassirer JP. Dealing with uncertainty, risks, and tradeoffs in clinical decisions. A cognitive science approach. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108: 435-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Detsky AS, Redelmeier D, Abrams HB. What's wrong with decision analysis? Can the left brain influence the right?. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 831-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Basile F, Scionti R, Petracca M. Diagnostic reliability of osteopathic tests: a systematic review. Int J Osteopath Med 2017; 25: 21-29
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Fritz JM, Wainner RS. Examining diagnostic tests: an evidence-based perspective. Phys Ther 2001; 81: 1546-1564
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Lichtstein DM. Strategies to Deal with Uncertainty in Medicine. Am J Med 2023; 136: 339-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Santhosh L, Chou CL, Connor DM. Diagnostic uncertainty: from education to communication. Diagnosis 2019; 6: 121-126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Braun RN, Mader FH. Programmierte Diagnostik in der Allgemeinmedizin. Heidelberg: Springer; 2005
    Google Scholar
  • 90 Armstrong K. If You Can't Beat It, Join It: Uncertainty and Trust in Medicine. Ann Intern Med 2018; 168: 818-819
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Gabutti M, Draper-Rodi J. Osteopathic decapitation: why do we consider the head differently from the rest of the body? New perspectives for an evidence-informed osteopathic approach to the head. Int J Osteopath Med 2014; 17: 256-262
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Binswanger M. Sinnlose Wettbewerbe. Freiburg: Herder; 2012
    Google Scholar
  • 93 Cervellin G, Borghi L, Lippi G. Do clinicians decide relying primarily on Bayesian principles or on gestalt perception? Some pearls and pitfalls of gestalt perception in medicine. Intern Emerg Med 2014; 9: 513-519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Custers EJ. Medical education and cognitive continuum theory: an alternative perspective on medical problem solving and clinical reasoning. Acad Med 2013; 88: 1074-1080
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ. et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014; 89: 1245-1251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 Greenhalgh T. Will COVID-19 be evidence-based medicine's nemesis?. PLoS Med 2020; 17: e1003266
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Ogilvie D, Adams J, Bauman A. et al. Using natural experimental studies to guide public health action: turning the evidence-based medicine paradigm on its head. J Epidemiol Community Health 2020; 74: 203-208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Subbiah V. The next generation of evidence-based medicine. Nat Med 2023; 29: 49-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Hobgen L, Sim M. The self-controlled and self-recorded clinical trial for low-grade morbidity. Br J Prev Soc Med 1953; 7: 163-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Mirza RD, Punja S, Vohra S. et al. The history and development of N-of-1 trials. J R Soc Med 2017; 110: 330-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Liu F, Panagiotakos D. Real-world data: a brief review of the methods, applications, challenges, and opportunities. BMC Med Res Methodol 2022; 22: 287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Köbberling J. Der Zweifel als Triebkraft des Erkenntnisgewinns in der Medizin. In: Kunz R, Ollenschläger G, Raspe H et al. Lehrbuch Evidenz-basierte Medizin in Klinik und Praxis. 2. Aufl. Köln: Deutscher Ärzte-Verlag; 2007
    Google Scholar
  • 103 He Y, Vinci RJ. Uncertainty in the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Art of Medicine. Pediatrics 2021; 147: e2020042937
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Simpkin AL, Schwartzstein RM. Tolerating Uncertainty – The Next Medical Revolution?. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1713-1715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Bean RB, Bean WB. Sir William Osler: aphorisms from his bedside teachings and writings. New York: Henry Schuman; 1950
    Google Scholar
  • 106 Battista RN, Hodge MJ. Clinical practice guidelines: between science and art. CMAJ 1993; 148: 385-389
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Pope C. Resisting Evidence: The Study of Evidence-Based Medicine as a Contemporary Social Movement. Health 2003; 7: 267-282
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Cotton A. Osteopathic principles in the modern world. Int J Osteopath Med 2013; 16: 17-24
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 109 Figg-Latham J, Rajendran D. Quiet dissent: The attitudes, beliefs and behaviours of UK osteopaths who reject low back pain guidance – A qualitative study. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2017; 27: 97-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Thomson OP, Petty NJ, Moore AP. Reconsidering the patient-centeredness of osteopathy. Int J Osteopath Med 2013; 16: 25-32
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 111 King L, Kremser S, Deam P. et al. Clinical reasoning in osteopathy: Experiences of novice and experienced practitioners. Int J Osteopath Med 2018; 28: 12-19
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Sidler S. Relevanz der Intuition in der Osteopathie – Überlegungen und ein Literaturüberblick. Osteopath Med 2010; 11: 4-9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Liem T. Intuitive Judgement in the Context of Osteopathic Clinical Reasoning. J Osteopath Med 2017; 117: 586-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Esteves JE. Diagnostic palpation in osteopathic medicine: a putative neurocognitive model of expertise. Thesis for PHD; Oxford Brookes University. 2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 McIntyre C, Lathlean J, Esteves JE. Osteopathic clinical reasoning: An ethnographic study of perceptual diagnostic judgments, and metacognition. Int J Osteopath Med 2018; 28: 30-41
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Chassy P, Gobet F. A hypothesis about the biological basis of expert intuition. Rev Gen Psychol 2011; 15: 198-212
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Barrows HS, Feltovich PJ. The clinical reasoning process. Med Educ 1987; 21: 86-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 2003; 58: 697-720
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Zeuch A. Ärztliche Intuition. Teil I: Intuition verstehen und als wertvolle Ressource nutzen. Frauenarzt 2008; 49: 280-282
    Google Scholar
  • 120 Dreyfus HL, Dreyfus SE. Mind Over Machine: The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer. New York: Free; 1986
    Google Scholar
  • 121 Dreyfus SE. The Five-Stage Model of Adult Skill Acquisition. Bulletin of Science. Technology & Society 2004; 24: 177-181
    Google Scholar
  • 122 Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N. (for the Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group) Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?. BMJ 2014; 348: g3725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Spadaccini J, Esteves JE. Intuition, analysis, and reflection: an experimental study into the decision-making processes and thinking dispositions of osteopathy students. Int J Osteopath Med 2014; 17: 263-271
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Ermann M. Intuition. Die unbewusste Intelligenz. Psychotherapeut 2013; 58: 136-142
  • 125 Schwartz A, Elstein AS. Clinical reasoning in medicine. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S et al. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3. Aufl. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 126 Flavell JH. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist 1979; 34: 906-911
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Veenman MVJ, Van Hout-Wolters BHAM, Afflerbach P. Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacogn Learning 2006; 1: 3-14
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Krieger F, Azevedo R, Graesser AC. et al. Introduction to the special issue: the role of metacognition in complex skills – spotlights on problem solving, collaboration, and self-regulated learning. Metacognition Learning 2022; 17: 683-690
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Still AT. Philosophy of osteopathy. Kirksville. MO: 1899
    Google Scholar
  • 130 van Elk M, Aleman A. Brain mechanisms in religion and spirituality: An integrative predictive processing framework. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 73: 359-378
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 D'Alessandro G, Cerritelli F, Cortelli P. Sensitization and Interoception as Key Neurological Concepts in Osteopathy and Other Manual Medicines. Front Neurosci 2016; 10: 100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 McGlone F, Cerritelli F, Walker S. et al. The role of gentle touch in perinatal osteopathic manual therapy. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 72: 1-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Thibodeau PH, Hendricks RK, Boroditsky L. How linguistic metaphor scaffolds reasoning. Trends Cogn Sci 2017; 21: 852-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Zegarra-Parodi R, Esteves JE, Lunghi C. et al. The legacy and implications of the body-mind-spirit osteopathic tenet: A discussion paper evaluating its clinical relevance in contemporary osteopathic care. Int J Osteopath Med 2021; 41: 57-65
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Miles A, Loughlin M. Models in the balance: evidence-based medicine versus evidence-informed individualized care. J Eval Clin Pract 2011; 17: 531-536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Consorti G, Marchetti A, De Marinis MG. What Makes an Osteopathic Treatment Effective from a Patient's Perspective: A Descriptive Phenomenological Study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2020; 43: 882-890
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Gigerenzer G, Muir Gray JA. Better doctors, better patients, better decisions. Envisioning health care 2020. Cambridge: MIT; 2011
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Vogel S. W(h)ither osteopathy: A call for reflection; a call for submissions for a special issue. Int J Osteopath Med 2021; 41: 1-3
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Hartmann C. Historisch reflektierte Osteopathie. 2. Aufl. Pähl: Jolandos; 2022
    Google Scholar
  • 140 Rogers FJ, D'Alonzo GE, Glover JC. et al. Proposed tenets of osteopathic medicine and principles for patient care. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2002; 102: 63-65
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 Smith D. Reflecting on new models for osteopathy: it's time for change. Int J Osteopath Med 2019; 31: 15-20
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 142 Carnes D, Mars T, Plunkett A. et al. A mixed methods evaluation of a third wave cognitive behavioural therapy and osteopathic treatment programme for chronic pain in primary care (OsteoMAP). Int J Osteopath Med 2017; 24: 12-17
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Esteves JE, Cerritelli F, Kim J. et al. Osteopathic Care as (En)active Inference: A Theoretical Framework for Developing an Integrative Hypothesis in Osteopathy. Front Psychol 2022; 13: 812926
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Liem T, Lunghi C. Osteopathie als personenzentrierte und integrierende Behandlungsmethode (Teil 2). Osteopath Med 2022; 23: 14-19
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 145 Banton A, Vogel S. Relational clinical practice: A hermeneutic, enactive, intersubjective model of osteopathy. Int J Osteopath Med 2023; 51: 100707
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Shaw R, Abbey H, Casals-Gutiérrez S. et al. Reconceptualizing the therapeutic alliance in osteopathic practice: Integrating insights from phenomenology, psychology and enactive inference. Int J Osteopath Med 2022; 46: 36-44
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Thomson OP, MacMillan A. Saying it doesnʼt make it so – a reply to Espírito Santo et al. Int J Osteopath Med 2024; 51: 100693
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Cerritelli F, Esteves JE. An Enactive-Ecological Model to Guide Patient-Centered Osteopathic Care. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10: 1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar