Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2276-0546
Original article

Multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the pocket-creation method with and without single-clip traction of colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection

1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
,
Daiki Nemoto
3   Department of Coloproctology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38219)
4   Department of Gastroenterology, Takeda General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
,
Tomohiro Kurokawa
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
,
5   Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN50196)
,
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
,
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
,
Masahiro Okada
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
,
Takahito Takezawa
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
,
Yuki Nakajima
3   Department of Coloproctology, Fukushima Medical University Aizu Medical Center, Fukushima, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38219)
,
Yuka Kowazaki
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
,
Hisashi Fukuda
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
2   Department of Gastroenterology, Jyoban Hospital of Tokiwa Foundation, Iwaki, Japan
,
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
6   Department of Gastroenterology, Mie Prefectural Shima Hospital, Shima, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN38367)
,
7   Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy, The Royal Free Hospital and University College London (UCL) Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, London, UK
,
Noriyoshi Fukushima
8   Department of Pathology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
,
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
,
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12838)
› Author Affiliations
JMU Graduate Student Start-Up Award

Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): UMIN000044059, Trial registry: UMIN Japan (http://www.umin.ac.jp/english/), Type of Study: Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study


Abstract

Background The pocket-creation method (PCM) was developed to overcome the technical difficulties of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), although opening the pocket remains challenging. We developed a novel technique of PCM with single-clip traction (PCM-CT), which uses a reopenable clip as a traction device to maintain stability during the procedure. No prospective study has compared the efficacy of PCM-CT and PCM. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of PCM-CT vs. PCM in a randomized controlled trial.

Methods This randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at four Japanese institutions. Patients with superficial colorectal neoplastic lesions were included following Japanese guidelines for colorectal cancer. Seven moderately experienced endoscopists performed the ESD procedures using either PCM-CT or PCM.

Results 100 patients were enrolled in the study. Compared with PCM, PCM-CT achieved significantly faster mean (SD) dissection speed (21.4 [10.8] vs. 27.0 [14.5] mm2/min [95%CI 0.5 to 10.7], P = 0.03), and reduced the mean procedure time (81.8 [57.9] vs. 64.8 [47.6] minutes [95%CI –38.2 to 4.3], P = 0.12) and pocket-opening time (37.8 [33.0] vs. 30.0 [28.9] minutes [95%CI –20.2 to 4.6], P = 0.22). En bloc and R0 resection rates were not significantly different between the two groups (100% vs. 100%, P >0.99; 100% vs. 96%, P = 0.50, respectively). No significant differences were observed in adverse events between the two groups.

Conclusion ESD facilitated by the novel PCM-CT method appeared to be significantly faster than PCM. Both methods achieved high R0 resection rates.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 October 2023

Accepted after revision: 26 February 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 February 2024

Article published online:
04 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany