Homöopathie: therapeutische Wirksamkeit und Anwendung in der klinischen Praxis

Zusammenfassung

Homöopathie, die mit kleinen Dosen verschiedener Substanzen Selbstregulations- und Selbstheilungsprozesse anregen soll, ist seit dem 19. Jahrhundert populär. Heutzutage liegt die weltweite Prävalenz aller Anwendungen der Homöopathie im Bereich von 0,2–9,8% (bevölkerungsbezogene Erhebungen zur Anwendung komplementärer Therapien). In diesem Review werden Metaanalysen mit gepoolten Daten aus Placebo kontrollierten klinischen Studien zur Homöopathie und einige Diskussionsartikel zur klinischen Wirksamkeit der Homöopathie analysiert. Die Daten sowohl aus randomisierten, kontrollierten Studien als auch aus experimentellen Untersuchungen zeigen Wirkungen homöopathischer Mittel, die der modernen rationalen Grundlage der Medizin widersprechen. Systematische Übersichten von Placebo kontrollierten Studien zur Homöopathie berichteten, dass ihre Wirkungen mehr als Placebo zu sein scheinen. Es fehlt an schlüssigen Beweisen für die Wirksamkeit der Homöopathie bei den meisten Erkrankungen sowie bei rheumatischen Erkrankungen. Die Homöopathie hat es bisher nicht vermocht, ihren Stellenwert durch die Anwendung evidenzbasierter Prinzipien zu demonstrieren. Zukünftige Studien sollten sich auf die Anwendung der Homöopathie bei bestimmten Krankheiten oder Krankheitsgruppen konzentrieren, anstatt Daten aus allen klinischen Studien erneut zu analysieren.

Abstract

Homeopathy, which uses small doses of various substances to stimulate autoregulatory and self-healing processes, became popular in the 19^th century. Today, the worldwide prevalence of all use of homeopathy is within the range of 0.2–9.8% (population-based surveys on the use of complementary therapies). In this review, meta-analyses including pooled data from placebo-controlled clinical trials of homeopathy and some articles dealing with the clinical efficacy of homeopathy were analysed. Some data from both randomised, controlled trials and laboratory research demonstrate effects from homeopathic remedies that contradict the contemporary rational basis of medicine. Systematic reviews of placebo-controlled trials on homeopathy reported that homeopathy seems to achieve greater effects than placebo. There is a lack of conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for most conditions, including rheumatic diseases. To date, homeopathy has failed to demonstrate its value through the application of evidence-based principles. Future studies should focus on utilising scientific methods to study homeopathy in specific diseases or groups of diseases instead of re-analysing pooled data from clinical trials.

Schlüsselwörter

Homöopathie - Homöopathische Arzneimittel - Häufigkeit - Evidenz - rheumatische Erkrankungen

Key words

rheumatic diseases - homeopathic medicines - prevalence - systematic review - homeopathyArtikel online veröffentlicht 2024

Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
07. Mai 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Lyn Lee E, Richards N, Harrison J. et al. Prevalence of Use of Traditional, Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the General Population: A Systematic Review of National Studies Published from 2010 to 2019. Drug Saf 2022; 45: 713-735
• 2 Relton C, Cooper K, Viksveen P. et al. Prevalence of homeopathy use by the general population worldwide: a systematic review. Homeopathy 2017; 106: 69-78
• 3 Dossett ML, Gloria Y, Yeh GY. Homeopathy Use in the United States and Implications for Public Health: A Review. Homeopathy 2018; 107: 3-9
• 4 Von Ammon K, Frei-Erb M, Cardini F. et al. Complementary and alternative medicine provision in Europe – first results approaching reality in an unclear field of practices. Forsch Komplementmed 2012; 19: 37-43
• 5 Brockow T, Franke A, Resch KL.. et al. Is homeopathy more than a placebo?. Praxis (Bern 1994) 1998; 87: 1687-1694
• 6 Gebhardt KH. Advances in homeopathy. Internist (Berl) 1999; 40: 1266-1270
• 7 Fisher P, Scott DL. A randomized controlled trial of homeopathy in rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2001; 40: 1052-1055
• 8 Manchanda RK, Gupta M, Gupta A. et al. The Clinical and Biological Effects of Homeopathically Prepared Signaling Molecules: A Scoping Review. Homeopathy 2022; 111: 10-21
• 9 Viksveen P, Dymitr Z, Simoens S. Economic evaluations of homeopathy: a review. Eur J Health Econ 2014; 15: 157-174
• 10 Ullman D. An Analysis of Four Government-Funded Reviews of Research on Homeopathic Medicine. Cureus. 2021; 13: e15899
• 11 Khuda-Bukhsh AR. Towards understanding molecular mechanisms of action of homeopathic drugs: an overview. Mol Cell Biochem 2003; 253: 339-435
• 12 Ücker A, Baumgartner S, Sokol A. et al. Systematic Review of Plant-Based Homeopathic Basic Research: An Update. Homeopathy. 2018; 107: 115-129
• 13 Ücker A, Baumgartner S, Martin D. et al. Critical Evaluation of Specific Efficacy of Preparations Produced According to European Pharmacopeia Monograph 2371. Biomedicines 2022; 10: 552
• 14 Bonamin LV, Cardoso TN, de Carvalho AC. et al. The use of animal models in homeopathic research – a review of 2010-2014 PubMed indexed papers. Homeopathy 2015; 104: 283-291
• 15 Vickers AJ. Independent replication of pre-clinical research in homeopathy: a systematic review. Forsch Komplementarmed 1999; 6: 311-320
• 16 Antonelli M, Davide Donelli D. Reinterpreting homoeopathy in the light of placebo effects to manage patients who seek homoeopathic care: A systematic review. Health Soc Care Community 2019; 27: 824-847
• 17 Rughiniş C, Ciocănel A, Vasile S. Homeopathy as Boundary Object and Distributed Therapeutic Agency. A Discussion on the Homeopathic Placebo Response. Am J Ther 2018; 25: e447-e452
• 18 Nuhn T, Lüdtke R, Geraedts M. Placebo effect sizes in homeopathic compared to conventional drugs – a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Homeopathy 2010; 99: 76-82
• 19 Shang A, Huwiler-Müntener K, Nartey L. et al. Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 2005; 366: 726-732
• 20 Linde K, Clausius N, Ramirez G. et al. Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Lancet 1997; 350: 834-843
• 21 Mathie RT, Ramparsad N, Legg LA. et al. Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 63
• 22 Jonas WB, Linde K, Ramirez G. Homeopathy and rheumatic disease. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000; 26: 117-123 x
• 23 Gibson RG, Gibson SL, Macneill AD. et al. Salicylates and homoeopathy in rheumatoid arthritis: preliminary observations. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 6: 391-395
• 24 Gibson RG, Gibson SL, Macneill AD. et al. Homoeopathic therapy in rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation by double-blind clinical therapeutic trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1980; 9: 453-459
• 25 Brien S, Lachance L, Prescott P. et al. Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011; 50: 1070-1082
• 26 Andrade LE, Ferraz MB, Atra E. et al. A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of homeopathy in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1991; 20: 204-208
• 27 Schirmer KP, Fritz M, Jackel WH. Effectiveness of Formica rufa and autologous blood injection in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a double-blind randomized study. Z Rheumatol 2000; 59: 321-329
• 28 Perry R, Terry R, Ernst E. A systematic review of homoeopathy for the treatment of fibromyalgia. Clin Rheumatol 2010; 29: 457-464
• 29 Holdcraft LC, Assefi N, Buchwald D. Complementary and alternative medicine in fibromyalgia and related syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2003; 17: 667-683
• 30 Baronowsky J, Klose P, Musial F. et al. Qualitative systematic review of randomised controlled trials on complementary and alternative medicine treatments in fibromyalgia. Rheumatol Int 2009; 30: 1-21
• 31 De Silva V, El-Metwally A, Ernst E. et al. Evidence for the efficacy of complementary and alternative medicines in the management of fibromyalgia: a systematic review. Rheumatology 2010; 49: 1063-1068
• 32 Terhorst L, Schneider M. Complementary and alternative medicine in the treatment of pain in fibromyalgia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2012. 12 (Suppl 1). 276
• 33 Langhorst J, Heldmann P, Henningsen P. et al. Complementary and alternative procedures for fibromyalgia syndrome : Updated guidelines 2017 and overview of systematic review articles. Schmerz 2017; 31: 289-295
• 34 Perry R, Leach V, Davies P. et al. An overview of systematic reviews of complementary and alternative therapies for fibromyalgia using both AMSTAR and ROBIS as quality assessment tools. Syst Rev 2017; 6: 97
• 35 Awmf (2017) Deutsche Schmerzgesellschaft. Definition, Pathophysiologie, Diagnostik und Therapie des Fibromyalgiesyndroms. http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/145-004.html
• 36 Moris M, Pellow J, Elizabeth Margaret Solomon EM. et al. Physiotherapy and a Homeopathic Complex for Chronic Low-back Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study. Altern Ther Health Med 2016; 22: 48-56
• 37 van Haseln RA, Fisher PA. A randomized controlled trial comparing topical piroxicam gel with a homeopathic gel in osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000; 39: 714-719
• 38 Long L, Ernst E. Homeopathic remedies for the treatment of osteoarthritis 2001; 90: 37-43
• 39 https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/033-004l_S2k_Gonarthrose_2018-01_1-verlaengert_01.pdf
• 40 Koley M, Saha S, Ghosh S. A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled feasibility study evaluating individualized homeopathy in managing pain of knee osteoarthritis. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med 2015; 20: 186-191
• 41 Posadzki P, Alotaibi A, Ernst E. Adverse effects of homeopathy: a systematic review of published case reports and case series. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66: 1178-1188
• 42 Ernst E. Risk-free homeopathy?. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1996; 126: 1677-1679
• 43 Grabia S, Ernst E. E Homeopathic aggravations: a systematic review of randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trials. Homeopathy 2003; 92: 92-98
• 44 Dantas F, Rampes H. Do homeopathic medicines provoke adverse effects? A systematic review. Br Homeopath J 2000; 89: S35-S38
• 45 Şenel E. Evolution of homeopathy: A scientometric analysis of global homeopathy literature between 1975 and 2017. Complement. Ther Clin Pract 2019; 34: 165-173
• 46 Hock N, Juckel G. G Homeopathy for psychiatric patients-for and against. Nervenarzt 2018; 89: 1014-1019
• 47 Grams N, Endruscheit U. Media and homeopathy: Reporting between proximity to lobbyism and distance from science. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2021; 64: 62-69
• 48 Marderosian AH. Understanding homeopathy. J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash) 1996; NS36: 317-321
• 49 Keyßer G, Michalsen A, Reuß-Borst M. et al. Recommendations of the committee on complementary medicine and nutrition in ayurvedic medicine, homeopathy, nutrition and Mediterranean diet. Z Rheumatol 2023;