Download PDF
Endoscopy 2024; 56(09): 694-705
DOI: 10.1055/a-2282-3350
Systematic review

Efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a meta-regression analysis

Cecilia Binda 
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
,
Elton Dajti 
2   European Reference Network on Hepatological Diseases, IRCSS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
3   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9296)
,
Paolo Giuffrida 
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
4   Section of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Health Promotion Sciences Maternal and Infant Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, PROMISE, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18998)
,
Margherita Trebbi
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
,
Chiara Coluccio
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
,
Alessandro Cucchetti
3   Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences - DIMEC, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9296)
,
Alessandro Fugazza 
5   Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
,
Barbara Perini
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
6   Gastroenterology Unit, Azienda Ospedale Universita Padova, Padova, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18624)
,
Giulia Gibiino 
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
,
Andrea Anderloni
7   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18631)
,
Alessandro Repici
5   Division of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Department of Gastroenterology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9268)
8   Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN437807)
,
Carlo Fabbri
1   Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Forlì-Cesena Hospitals, AUSL della Romagna, Forlì-Cesena, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN390233)
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints


Abstract

Background Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is a valid option for EUS-guided biliary drainage that has been increasingly used in the last decade. The aims of this study were to provide a systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression of the features and outcomes of this procedure.

Methods The MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for literature pertinent to EUS-HGS. Meta-analysis of the proportions and meta-regression of potential modifiers of the main outcome measures were applied. The main outcome was technical success; secondary outcomes were clinical success and procedure-related adverse events (AEs).

Results 33 studies, including 1644 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) was the underlying cause in almost all cases (99.6%); the main indications for EUS-HGS were duodenal/papillary invasion (34.8%), surgically altered anatomy (18.4%), and hilar stenosis (16.0%). The pooled technical success of EUS-HGS was 97.7% (95%CI 96.1%–99.0%; I 2 = 0%), the intention-to-treat clinical success rate was 88.1% (95%CI 84.7%–91.2%; I 2 = 33.9%), and procedure-related AEs occurred in 12.0% (95%CI 9.8%–14.5%; I 2 = 20.4%), with cholangitis/sepsis (2.8%) and bleeding (2.3%) the most frequent. The rate of procedure-related AEs was lower with the use of dedicated stents on univariable meta-regression analysis. Meta-regression showed that technical success and clinical success rates were modified by the centers’ experience (>4/year).

Conclusions EUS-HGS represents an effective and safe procedure for EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with MBO. Future studies should address the impact of center experience, patient selection, and the use of dedicated stents to improve performance of this technique.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 16 October 2023

Accepted after revision: 06 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
06 March 2024

Article published online:
11 July 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Hedjoudje A, Sportes A, Grabar S. et al. Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. United European Gastroenterol J 2019; 7: 60-68
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline – Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-930
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lee TH, Choi JH, Park do H. et al. Similar efficacies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural and percutaneous drainage for malignant distal biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016; 14: 1011-1019.e3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Burmester E, Niehaus J, Leineweber T. et al. EUS-cholangio-drainage of the bile duct: report of 4 cases. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Giovannini M, Dotti M, Bories E. et al. Hepaticogastrostomy by echo-endoscopy as a palliative treatment in a patient with metastatic biliary obstruction. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 1076-1078
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Paik WH, Park DH. Outcomes and limitations: EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8: S44-S49
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nakai Y, Sato T, Hakuta R. et al. Long-term outcomes of a long, partially covered metal stent for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy in patients with malignant biliary obstruction (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 623-631.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Spadaccini M. et al. Single-session EUS-guided gastroenterostomy and hepaticogastrostomy using dedicated metal stents (with videos). Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10: 214-215
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Minaga K, Ogura T, Shiomi H. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and hepaticogastrostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 575-582
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 van Houwelingen HC, Arends LR, Stijnen T. Advanced methods in meta-analysis: multivariate approach and meta-regression. Stat Med 2002; 21: 589-624
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Brooke BS, Schwartz TA, Pawlik TM. MOOSE reporting guidelines for meta-analyses of observational studies. JAMA Surg 2021; 156: 787-788
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM. et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n71
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC. et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011; 343: d5928
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 14 Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D. et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses – 2008. Accessed March 28, 2024 at: https://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
    PubMed
  • 15 Freeman MF, Tukey JW. Transformations related to the angular and the square root. Ann Math Stat 1950; 21: 607-611
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Wan X, Wang W, Liu J. et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14: 135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ. et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003; 327: 557-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M. et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50: 1088-1101
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Panpimanmas S, Ratanachu-ek T. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma after failed stenting by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Asian J Surg 2013; 36: 154-158
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Ogura T, Chiba Y, Masuda D. et al. Comparison of the clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and hepaticogastrostomy for bile duct obstruction with duodenal obstruction. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 156-163 [published correction appears in Endoscopy 2016; 48: 163]
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Mukai S, Itoi T, Sofuni A. et al. Urgent and early EUS-guided biliary drainage in patients with acute cholangitis. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10: 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 De Cassan C, Bories E, Pesenti C. et al. Use of partially covered and uncovered metallic prosthesis for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: Results of a retrospective monocentric study. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6: 329-335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 De Cassan C, Bories E, Pesenti C. et al. Use of partially covered and uncovered metallic prosthesis for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: Results of a retrospective monocentric study. Endosc Ultrasound 2017; 6: 329-335
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Ogura T, Sano T, Onda S. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for right hepatic bile duct obstruction: novel technical tips. Endoscopy 2015; 47: 72-75
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Winkler J, Caillol F, Ratone JP. et al. Feasibility of EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy for inoperable malignant hilar biliary strictures. Endosc Ultrasound 2021; 10: 51-56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Artifon EL, Marson FP, Gaidhane M. et al. Hepaticogastrostomy or choledochoduodenostomy for distal malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP: is there any difference?. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 950-959
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Huang P, Zhang H, Zhang XF. et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography guided biliary drainage and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in the management of malignant obstructive jaundice after failed ERCP. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2017; 27: e127-e131 [published correction appears in Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2018; 28: 133]
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Ogura T, Higuchi K. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy: technical review and tips to prevent adverse events. Gut Liver 2021; 15: 196-205
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Fugazza A, Colombo M, Spadaccini M. et al. Relief of jaundice in malignant biliary obstruction: When should we consider endoscopic ultrasonography-guided hepaticogastrostomy as an option?. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2022; 21: 234-240
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Minaga K, Ogura T, Shiomi H. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledochoduodenostomy and hepaticogastrostomy for malignant distal biliary obstruction: Multicenter, randomized, clinical trial. Dig Endosc 2019; 31: 575-582
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Okuno N, Hara K, Mizuno N. et al. Efficacy of the 6-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stent during endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy as a primary biliary drainage for the cases estimated difficult endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A prospective clinical study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33: 1413-1421
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Sportes A, Camus M, Greget M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasoundguided hepaticogastrostomy versus percutaneous transhepatic drainage for malignant biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A retrospective expertisebased study from two centers. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017; 10: 483-493
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Khashab MA, Valeshabad AK, Afghani E. et al. A comparative evaluation of EUS-guided biliary drainage and percutaneous drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction and failed ERCP. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60: 557-565
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Caillol F, Rouy M, Pesenti C. et al. Drainage of the right liver using EUS guidance. Endosc Ultrasound 2019; 8 (Suppl. 01) S50-S56
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Moryoussef F, Sportes A, Leblanc S. et al. Is EUS-guided drainage a suitable alternative technique in case of proximal biliary obstruction?. Ther Adv Gastroenterol 2017; 10: 537-544
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Ogura T, Nishioka N, Miyano A. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy combined with antegrade stenting using a double bare covered metal stent. Endoscopy 2019; 51: E24-E25
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Ma KW, So H, Cho DH. et al. Durability and outcome of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticoduodenostomy using a fully covered metal stent for segregated right intrahepatic duct dilatation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 35: 1753-1760
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Park DH. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage of hilar biliary obstruction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2015; 22: 664-668
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Paik WH, Park DH, Choi JH. et al. Simplified fistula dilation technique and modified stent deployment maneuver for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 5051-5059
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Miyano A, Ogura T, Yamamoto K. et al. Clinical impact of the intra-scope channel stent release technique in preventing stent migration during EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2018; 22: 1312-1318
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Giri S, Mohan BP, Jearth V. et al. Adverse events with endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98: 515-523.e18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Fabbri C, Binda C, Sbrancia M. et al. Determinants of outcomes of transmural EUS-guided gallbladder drainage: systematic review with proportion meta-analysis and meta-regression. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 7974-7985
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Barkay O, Mosler P, Schmitt CM. et al. Effect of endoscopic stenting of malignant bile duct obstruction on quality of life. J Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 47: 526-531
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Miller CS, Barkun AN, Martel M. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for distal malignant obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E1563-E1573
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Uemura RS, Khan MA, Otoch JP. et al. EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy versus hepaticogastrostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018; 52: 123-130
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L. et al. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 127-149
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Ishiwatari H, Ishikawa K, Niiya F. et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus hepaticogastrostomy with antegrade stenting for malignant distal biliary obstruction. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 703-712
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Mao K, Hu B, Sun F. et al. Choledochoduodenostomy Versus Hepaticogastrostomy in Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage for Malignant Biliary Obstruction: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2021; 32: 124-132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Oh D, Park DH, Song TJ. et al. Optimal biliary access point and learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy with transmural stenting. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2017; 10: 42-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 James TW, Baron TH. Practical applications and learning curve for EUS-guided hepaticoenterostomy: results of a large single-center US retrospective analysis. Endosc Int Open 2019; 7: E600-E607
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Vanella G, Bronswijk M, van Wanrooij RL. et al. Combined endoscopic mAnagement of BiliaRy and gastrIc OutLET obstruction (CABRIOLET Study): A multicenter retrospective analysis. DEN Open 2022; 3: e132
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Kitagawa K, Mitoro A, Minami R. et al. Efficacy of a dedicated plastic stent in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy during the learning curve: cumulative multi-center experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 2023; 58: 296-303
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 54 Ohno A, Fujimori N, Kaku T. et al. Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy without dilation: a propensity score matching analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 67: 5676-5684
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar