Use of Postpartum Hemorrhage Checklist during Vaginal Deliveries: A Quality Improvement Study

Abstract

Objective Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) protocols improve patient safety and reduce utilization of blood products; however, few data exist on sustainability of PPH checklist use, how use affects care delivery, and variation of use among patient subgroups. This study aimed to (1) examine compliance with PPH checklist use during vaginal deliveries, (2) evaluate whether checklist use varied by patient and/or care team characteristics, and (3) evaluate whether checklist use was associated with increased use of recommended medications/interventions.

Study Design This was a quality improvement study performed from April 2021 through June 2023. A multidisciplinary team developed a revised PPH checklist and used quality improvement methodology to increase checklist use following vaginal birth. Data were collected from medical records and clinician survey. Control charts were generated to track checklist use and evaluate special cause variation. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate variation in medications/interventions and across subgroups.

Results During the study period, there were 342 cases of PPH at the time of vaginal birth. The checklist was used in 67% of PPH cases during the 20-month period after implementation in a setting where no checklist was previously being used. We found no statistically significant differences in checklist use by patient or health care team characteristics. Use of tranexamic acid, carboprost, and misoprostol were significantly associated with checklist use.

Conclusion This study demonstrated successful implementation of a checklist protocol where no checklist was previously being used, with sustained use in an average of 67% of PPH cases over 20 months. Checklist use was consistent across subgroups and was associated with higher use of interventions shown to lower blood loss.

Key Points

• Our study showed sustainability of PPH checklist use over a 20-month period.

• PPH checklist use was associated with increased use of interventions known to reduce blood loss.

• Checklist was used consistently across patient subgroups; may help address inequities in obstetric outcomes.

Keywords

health care quality improvement - obstetrics and gynecology - patient safety - checklists - postpartum hemorrhage

• References

• 1 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Report from Nine Maternal Mortality Review Committees. 2018 . Accessed October 9, 2022 at: https://www.cdcfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/ReportfromNineMMRCs.pdf
• 2 Knight M, Callaghan WM, Berg C. et al. Trends in postpartum hemorrhage in high resource countries: a review and recommendations from the International Postpartum Hemorrhage Collaborative Group. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2009; 9 (01) 55
• 3 Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D. et al. Vital Signs: Pregnancy-Related Deaths, United States, 2011-2015, and Strategies for Prevention, 13 States, 2013-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019; 68 (18) 423-429
• 4 Hales BM, Pronovost PJ. The checklist–a tool for error management and performance improvement. J Crit Care 2006; 21 (03) 231-235
• 5 Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR. et al; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 2009; 360 (05) 491-499
• 6 Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S. et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 2006; 355 (26) 2725-2732
• 7 U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Racial Disparities in Maternal Health. 2021 . Accessed April 8, 2024 at: https://www.usccr.gov/files/2021/09-15-Racial-Disparities-in-Maternal-Health.pdf
• 8 Main EK, Chang SC, Dhurjati R, Cape V, Profit J, Gould JB. Reduction in racial disparities in severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage in a large-scale quality improvement collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (01) 123.e1-123.e14
• 9 The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion No. 680: The Use and Development of Checklists in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 128 (05) e237-e240
• 10 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 76: Postpartum Hemorrhage. Obstet Gynecol N Y 1953 2006; 108 (04) 1039-1046
• 11 SQUIRE. Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence SQUIRE 2.0. 2020 . Accessed April 8, 2023 at: http://www.squire-statement.org/index.cfm?fuseaction=Page.ViewPage&PageID=471
• 12 Provost LP, Murray KS. The Health Care Data Guide: Learning from Data for Improvement. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated; 2011. . Accessed November 2, 2022 at: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/unc/detail.action?docID=697964
• 13 Davidson C, Denning S, Thorp K. et al. Examining the effect of quality improvement initiatives on decreasing racial disparities in maternal morbidity. BMJ Qual Saf 2022; 31 (09) 670-678
• 14 Fausett MB, Propst A, Van Doren K, Clark BT. How to develop an effective obstetric checklist. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (03) 165-170
• 15 Main EK, Cape V, Abreo A. et al. Reduction of severe maternal morbidity from hemorrhage using a state perinatal quality collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216 (03) 298.e1-298.e11
• 16 Einerson BD, Miller ES, Grobman WA. Does a postpartum hemorrhage patient safety program result in sustained changes in management and outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 212 (02) 140-4.e1
• 17 Shields LE, Smalarz K, Reffigee L, Mugg S, Burdumy TJ, Propst M. Comprehensive maternal hemorrhage protocols improve patient safety and reduce utilization of blood products. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011; 205 (04) 368.e1-368.e8
• 18 Smith RB, Erickson LP, Mercer LT, Hermann CE, Foley MR. Improving obstetric hemorrhage morbidity by a checklist-based management protocol; a quality improvement initiative. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 236: 166-172
• 19 Lappen JR, Seidman D, Burke C, Goetz K, Grobman WA. Changes in care associated with the introduction of a postpartum hemorrhage patient safety program. Am J Perinatol 2013; 30 (10) 833-838
• 20 Jones CP. Invited commentary: “race,” racism, and the practice of epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 2001; 154 (04) 299-304 , discussion 305–306
• 21 Martinez RA, Smith NR, Andrabi N, Goodwin AN, Wilbur R, Zivich PN. Beyond the Boxes: Guiding Questions for Thoughtfully Measuring and Interpreting Race in Population Health Research. IAPHS Blog. Published September 28, 2022. Accessed February 4, 2023 at: https://cdr.lib.unc.edu/concern/scholarly_works/9880w077s