RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2285-3223
Instructions for meaningful figures in radiological research publications
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutsch Gefördert durch: Werner Otto Stiftung 17/102Gefördert durch: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 310/16-1
Gefördert durch: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Abstract
Purpose
In this paper, we explain the structure and function of different types of figures and provide guidance on how to create effective figures for radiological research publications.
Method
Based on scientific literature and our own experience, we have compiled a series of instructions to support the purposeful creation of effective figures for radiological research publications.
Results
Effective figures play a crucial role in radiological research publications by clearly visualizing complex content and thereby enhancing its comprehensibility. Different types of figures have distinct strengths that should be strategically employed for optimal impact. The interplay between figures weaves the “common thread” of a publication, facilitating reader comprehension and providing a straightforward path to the answer of the central research question. The systematic coordination (line of evidence) and effective design of individual figures are crucial to compellingly support the publication’s central hypothesis.
Conclusion
The deliberate creation and coordination of figures in radiological research publications are decisive factors for successful publishing.
Key Points
-
Different types of figures have distinct strengths that should be strategically employed for optimal impact.
-
The interplay between figures weaves the “common thread” of a publication, facilitating reader comprehension and providing a straightforward path to the answer of the central research question.
-
The appropriate coordination of different types of figures enables an effective and precise presentation of the research findings.
-
The systematic coordination (line of evidence) and effective design of individual figures are crucial to compellingly support the publication’s central hypothesis.
-
The deliberate creation and coordination of figures in radiological research publications are decisive factors for successful publishing.
Citation Format
-
Pape LJ, Hambach J, Bannas P. Instructions for figures in radiological research publications. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; DOI 10.1055/a-2285-3223
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 07. Dezember 2023
Angenommen nach Revision: 11. März 2024
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
15. Mai 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Bannas P, Adam G, Bley TA. Anleitung zu wissenschaftlichen radiologischen Publikationen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2013; 185: 533-538
- 2 Offiah AC, Chu WCW, Davis R. et al. How to prepare successful scientific manuscripts: practical advice from editors of radiology journals. Pediatr Radiol 2014; 44: 1056-1057
- 3 Bannas P. Instructions for Radiological Case Reports. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 189: 333-338
- 4 Rosenfeldt FL, Dowling JT, Pepe S. et al. How to write a paper for publication. Heart Lung Circ 2000; 9: 82-87
- 5 Bannas P, Reeder SB. How to write an original radiological research manuscript. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 4455-4460
- 6 Redaktion/sca Z. Fortschr Röntgenstr Autorenhinweise. In. Fortschr Röntgenstr.
- 7 Whimster WF. Biomedical Research. 2. Aufl. London: Springer; 1996.
- 8 Association AP. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. 7. Aufl. American Psychological Association; 2020
- 9 Briscoe MH. Preparing Scientific Illustrations. 2. Aufl. Springer; New York, NY: 1996.
- 10 Wong B. Salience. Nat Methods 2010; 7: 773-773
- 11 America RSoN. Scientific Style Guide: Writing a Manuscript for Radiology. In.
- 12 Lauren EF, Kevin CC. Graphs, Tables, and Figures in Scientific Publications: The Good, the Bad, and How Not to Be the Latter. J Hand Surg Am 2012; 37: 591-596
- 13 William AW. Me write pretty one day: how to write a good scientific paper. J Cell Biol 2004; 165: 757-758
- 14 America MLAo. MLA Handbook. 9. Aufl. Modern Language Association of America; 2021
- 15 Nicolas PR, Michael D, Philip EB. Ten Simple Rules for Better Figures. Plos Comput Biol 2014; 10: e1003833
- 16 Weissgerber TL, Winham SJ, Heinzen EP. et al. Reveal, Don’t Conceal. Circulation 2019; 140: 1506-1518
- 17 Weissgerber TL, Milic NM, Winham SJ. et al. Beyond Bar and Line Graphs: Time for a New Data Presentation Paradigm. Plos Biol 2015; 13: e1002128
- 18 Fosang AJ, Colbran RJ. Transparency Is the Key to Quality. J Biol Chem 2015; 290: 29692-29694
- 19 Rice K, Lumley T. Graphics and statistics for cardiology: comparing categorical and continuous variables. Heart 2016; 102: 349-355
- 20 Jambor H, Antonietti A, Alicea B. et al. Creating clear and informative image-based figures for scientific publications. Plos Biol 2021; 19: e3001161
- 21 Katsnelson A. Colour me better: fixing figures for colour blindness. Nature 2021; 598: 224-225
- 22 Press TUoC. The Chicago Manual of Style. 17. Aufl. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2017