Digestive neo-epithelialization after endoscopic stenting for upper digestive tract complete disunion

Abstract

Background Complete digestive disunion due to anastomotic necrosis is considered a contraindication to endoscopic repair. However, recent publications have suggested that endoscopic treatment by insertion of a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) is possible. The report of this patient series aims to demonstrate the use of endoscopic management in selected cases with complete digestive disunion.

Methods Seven consecutive patients with complete and circumferential upper gastrointestinal anastomotic disunion were treated at two European tertiary care centers between 2009 and 2021 by endoscopic insertion of an SEMS. Treatment was performed with a therapeutic gastroscope under general anesthesia, carbon dioxide insufflation, and fluoroscopic guidance, after surgical or percutaneous drainage.

Results All patients were successfully treated by endoscopic insertion of fully or partially covered SEMS left in place for a median of 8 weeks, with a median of 3 endoscopic sessions. Digestive neo-epithelialization was associated with a restored circumferential gut lumen in all cases. The rate of stent migration was 23% and three patients (43%) experienced symptomatic strictures, which were successfully treated by endoscopic dilation.

Conclusion Complete digestive rupture could be successfully treated by endoscopy in selected cases, adding proof-of-concept data regarding guided tissue regeneration alongside SEMS placement.

Publication History

Received: 03 February 2023

Accepted after revision: 14 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
14 March 2024

Article published online:
23 April 2024

• References

• 1 Paspatis GA, Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM. et al. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 792-810
• 2 Spaander MCW, van der Bogt RD, Baron TH. et al. Esophageal stenting for benign and malignant disease: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2021. Endoscopy 2021; 53: 751-762
• 3 Siersema PD. Treatment of esophageal perforations and anastomotic leaks: the endoscopist is stepping into the arena. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 897-900
• 4 Amrani L, Ménard C, Berdah S. et al. From iatrogenic digestive perforation to complete anastomotic disunion: endoscopic stenting as a new concept of “stent-guided regeneration and re-epithelialization”. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1282-1287
• 5 Gonzalez JM, Vanbiervliet G, Gasmi M. et al. Efficacy of the endoscopic rendez-vous technique for the reconstruction of complete esophageal disruptions. Endoscopy 2016; 48: 179-183
• 6 Dua KS, Hogan WJ, Aadam AA. et al. In-vivo oesophageal regeneration in a human being by use of a non-biological scaffold and extracellular matrix. Lancet 2016; 388: 55-61
• 7 Messager M, Warlaumont M, Renaud F. et al. Recent improvements in the management of esophageal anastomotic leak after surgery for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017; 43: 258-269
• 8 Swinnen J, Eisendrath P, Rigaux J. et al. Self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of benign upper GI leaks and perforations. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 890-899
• 9 Toussaint E, Eisendrath P, Kwan V. et al. Endoscopic treatment of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas after bariatric surgery with the use of a fistula plug: report of five cases. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 560-563
• 10 Rutegård M, Lagergren P, Rouvelas I. et al. Intrathoracic anastomotic leakage and mortality after esophageal cancer resection: a population-based study. Ann Surg Oncol 2012; 19: 99-103
• 11 Chang SH, Stoll CRT, Song J. et al. The effectiveness and risks of bariatric surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2003–2012. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 275-287
• 12 Gonzalez R, Sarr MG, Smith CD. et al. Diagnosis and contemporary management of anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass for obesity. J Am Coll Surg 2007; 204: 47-55
• 13 Joo MK. Endoscopic approach for major complications of bariatric surgery. Clin Endosc 2017; 50: 31-41
• 14 Eisendrath P, Deviere J. Major complications of bariatric surgery: endoscopy as first-line treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 12: 701-710
• 15 Freeman RK, Van Woerkom JM, Ascioti AJ. Esophageal stent placement for the treatment of iatrogenic intrathoracic esophageal perforation. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 83: 2003-2007
• 16 van Boeckel PGA, Sijbring A, Vleggaar FP. et al. Systematic review: temporary stent placement for benign rupture or anastomotic leak of the oesophagus. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2011; 33: 1292-1301
• 17 Rogalski P, Swidnicka-Siergiejko A, Wasielica-Berger J. et al. Endoscopic management of leaks and fistulas after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 1067-1087
• 18 Eisendrath P, Cremer M, Himpens J. et al. Endotherapy including temporary stenting of fistulas of the upper gastrointestinal tract after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 625-630
• 19 Intriago JMV, de Moura DTH, do Monte Junior ES. et al. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) for the treatment of post-bariatric surgery leaks and fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 2022; 32: 3435-3451
• 20 Lange J, Knievel J, Wichmann D. et al. Clinical implantation of 92 VACStents in the upper gastrointestinal tract of 50 patients – applicability and safety analysis of an innovative endoscopic concept. Front Surg 2023; 10: 1182094