Download PDF
Klin Padiatr 2024; 236(03): 180-188
DOI: 10.1055/a-2290-6323
Original Article

The Efficacy of Three Different Oral Hygiene Regimens in Preventing Chemotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis in Pediatric Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Wirksamkeit von drei verschiedenen Mundhygienemaßnahmen zur Prophylaxe Chemotherapie-induzierter oraler Mukositis bei Kindern mit hämatopoetischer Stammzelltransplantation
Utku Aygunes 
1   Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Acibadem Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
,
Barbaros Sahin Karagun 
2   Department of PediatricHematology/Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Acibadem University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
,
Ilgen Sasmaz 
3   Department of PediatricHematology/Oncology& Bone MarrowTransplantation, AcibademUniversity, Faculty of Medicine, Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
,
Bülent Antmen 
4   Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology & Bone Marrow Transplantation, Acibadem University, Faculty of Medicine, Adana Hospital, Adana, Turkey
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Oral mucositis is one of the side effects developed post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of a mouthwash mixture (lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, pheniramine) versus hyaluronic acid and a solution of sodium bicarbonate in terms of healing time and weight gain in the treatment of oral mucositis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with hemato-oncological malignancies.

Methods A total of 171 patients that received chemotherapy for the hematopoietic stem cell transplant were divided into three groups; group 1, treated with a mixed mouthwash of lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, and pheniramine; group 2, treated with hyaluronic acid; and group 3, treated with an aqueous solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate. Weight and mucositis scale scores derived from medical records of patients.

Results There was a statistically significant difference in the mucositis scale scores between the groups on the transplant day and days 5, 10, 15 and 20 after the transplantation. At these measurement points, Group 2 (receiving hyaluronic acid) had a lower score, and Group 3 (who received sodium bicarbonate) had a higher score, especially on days 5 and 10 after the transplantation.

Conclusion The results suggest that hyaluronic acid is a more effective treatment option than the other oral care solutions that are frequently used for prophylaxis and treatment of oral mucositis.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Die orale Mukositis ist eine der Nebenwirkungen, die nach einer hämatopoetischen Stammzelltransplantation auftreten können. Ziel der vorliegenden retrospektiven Studie war es, die Wirksamkeit einer Mundspülung, die eine Kombination von Lidocain, Natriumalginat, Sucralfat und Pheniramin enthält, im Vergleich zu Hyaluronsäure und einer Natriumbicarbonatlösung hinsichtlich Heilungszeit und Gewichtszunahme bei der Behandlung der oralen Mukositis bei Kindern mit hämatoonkologischer Erkrankung zu prüfen, die sich einer allogenen hämatopoetischen Stammzelltransplantation unterzogen.

Methode Insgesamt 171 Patienten, die eine Chemotherapie als Konditionierung vor hämatopoetischen Stammzelltransplantation erhielten, wurden in drei Gruppen eingeteilt: Gruppe 1, Behandlung mit einer Mundspülung mit Lidocain, Natriumalginat, Sucralfat und Pheniramin; Gruppe 2, Behandlung mit Hyaluronsäure; und Gruppe 3, Behandlung mit einer wässrigen Natriumcarbonatlösung (5 %). Das Gewicht und der Mukositis-Skala-Wert wurden den Krankenakten der Patienten entnommen.

Ergebnisse Es fand sich ein statistisch signifikanter Unterschied in den Mukositis-Skala-Werten zwischen den Gruppen am Tag der Transplantation und an den Tagen 5, 10, 15 und 20 nach der Transplantation. Zu diesen Messzeitpunkten hatte Gruppe 2, die Hyaluronsäure erhielt, einen niedrigeren Wert und Gruppe 3, die Natriumbikarbonat erhielt, einen höheren Mukositis-Skala-Wert, insbesondere an den Tagen 5 und 10 nach der Transplantation.

Schlussfolgerung Die Ergebnisse legen nahe, dass Hyaluronsäure eine wirksamere Behandlungsoption im Vergleich zu anderen häufig prophylaktisch oder therapeutisch bei oraler Mukositis eingesetzten Mundspülungen darstellten könnte.

Key words

Mucositis - pediatric - hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - hygiene - treatment.

Schlüsselwörter

Mukositis - Kinder - hämatopoetische Stammzelltransplantation - Hygiene - Behandlung.


Publication History

Article published online:
10 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Indira S, Hisham A-A. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. In: Lanzkowsky P, Lipton JM, Fish JD, eds. Lanzkowsky’s Manual Of Pediatric Hematology And Oncology 6th ed. 2016. 577.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Yeşilipek MA. Hematopoetic stem cell transplantation in children. Turk Pediatr Ars 2014; 49: 91-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Darzynkiewicz Z, Traganos F, Wlodkowic D. Impaired DNA damage response – An Achilles’ heel sensitizing cancer to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Eur J Pharmacol 2009; 625: 143-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kamsvåg T, Svanberg A, Legert KG. et al. Prevention of oral mucositis with cryotherapy in children undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantations – a feasibility study and randomized controlled trial. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28: 4869-4879
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Muratore E, Leardini D, Baccelli F. et al. The emerging role of nutritional support in the supportive care of pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Front Nutr 2023; 10: 1075778
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Zecha JAEM, Raber-Durlacher JE, Laheij AMGA. et al. The impact of the oral cavity in febrile neutropenia and infectious complications in patients treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27: 3667-3679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Eilers J, Berger AM, Petersen MC. Development, testing, and application of the oral assessment guide - PubMed. Oncol Nurs Forum 1988; 15: 325-330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Haverman TM, Raber-Durlacher JE, Rademacher WMH. et al. Oral complications in hematopoietic stem cell recipients: The role of inflammation. Mediators Inflamm 2014; 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Shankar A, Roy S, Bhandari M. et al. Current trends in management of oral mucositis in cancer treatment. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2017; 18: 2019-2026
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Georgiou M, Patapatiou G, Domoxoudis S. et al. Oral mucositis: Understanding the pathology and management. Hippokratia 2012; 16: 215-216
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Vagliano L, Feraut C, Gobetto G. et al. Incidence and severity of oral mucositis in patients undergoing haematopoietic SCTresults of a multicentre study. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 727-732
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lalla RV, Sonis ST, Peterson DE. Management of Oral Mucositis in Patients Who Have Cancer. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 61-77
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bechard LJ, Guinan EC, Feldman HA. et al. Prognostic factors in the resumption of oral dietary intake after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in Children. J Parenter Enter Nutr 2007; 31: 295-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Biswal BM. Current trends in the management of oral mucositis related to cancer treatment. Malaysian J Med Sci 2008; 15: 4-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Singh V, Singh A. Oral mucositis. Natl J Maxillofac Surg 2020; 11: 159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Yarom N, Ariyawardana A, Hovan A. et al. Systematic review of natural agents for the management of oral mucositis in cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 2013; 21: 3209-3221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Choi SE, Kim HS. Sodium bicarbonate solution versus chlorhexidine mouthwash in oral care of acute leukemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2012; 6: 60-66
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Naidu MUR, Ramana GV, Rani PU. et al. Chemotherapy-induced and/or radiation therapy-induced oral mucositis - Complicating the treatment of cancer. Neoplasia 2004; 6: 423-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Casale M, Moffa A, Vella P. et al. Hyaluronic acid: Perspectives in dentistry. A systematic review. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 2016; 29: 572-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chaveli-López B, Bagán-Sebastián JV. Treatment of oral mucositis due to chemotherapy. J Clin Exp Dent 2016; 8: e201-e209
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Edwards A, Santos C, Chen AY. et al. Nutritional interventions for oral mucositis: a systematic literature review. Nutrition and Dietetics 2021; 78: 101-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sobue T, Bertolini M, Thompson A. et al. Chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis and associated infections in a novel organotypic model. Mol Oral Microbiol 2018; 33: 212-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Yu Y-T, Deng J-L, Jin X-R. et al. Effects of 9 oral care solutions on the prevention of oral mucositis: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99: e19661
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Cabrera-Jaime S, Martínez C, Ferro-García T. et al. Efficacy of Plantago major, chlorhexidine 0.12% and sodium bicarbonate 5% solution in the treatment of oral mucositis in cancer patients with solid tumour: A feasibility randomised triple-blind phase III clinical trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018; 32: 40-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ala S, Saeedi M, Janbabai G. et al. Efficacy of Sucralfate Mouth Wash in Prevention of 5-fluorouracil Induced Oral Mucositis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial. Nutr Cancer 2016; 68: 456-463
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sio TT, Le-Rademacher JG, Leenstra JL. et al. Effect of Doxepin Mouthwash or Diphenhydramine-Lidocaine-Antacid Mouthwash vs Placebo on Radiotherapy-Related Oral Mucositis Pain: The Alliance A221304 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA – J Am Med Assoc 2019; 321: 1481-1490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Wen S, Brito L, Santander J. et al. Update on the treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced buccal mucositis: a systematic review. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2023; 36: 3-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Agha-Hosseini F, Pourpasha M, Amanlou M. et al. Mouthwash Containing Vitamin E, Triamcinolon, and Hyaluronic Acid Compared to Triamcinolone Mouthwash Alone in Patients With Radiotherapy-Induced Oral Mucositis: Randomized Clinical Trial. Front Oncol 2021; 11: 614877
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mubaraki S, Pani SC, Alseraihy A. et al. The efficacy of two different oral hygiene regimens on the incidence and severity of oral mucositis in pediatric patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A prospective interventional study. Spec Care. Dent 2020; 40: 566-573
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Costa EMM de B, Fernandes MZ, Quinder LB, et al. Evaluation of an oral preventive protocol in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003; 17: 147-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bardellini E, Amadori F, Schumacher RF. et al. Efficacy of a Solution Composed by Verbascoside, Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and Sodium Hyaluronate in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-induced Oral Mucositis in Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2016; 38: 559-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Buchsel PC. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-sodium hyaluronate gel (Gelclair): a bioadherent oral gel for the treatment of oral mucositis and other painful oral lesions. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008; 4: 1449-1154
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Scully C, Sonis S, Diz PD. Oral mucositis. Oral Dis 2006; 12: 229-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Chaudhry HM, Bruce AJ, Wolf RC. et al. The Incidence and Severity of Oral Mucositis among Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Patients: A Systematic Review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22: 605-616
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar