RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/a-2292-5263
Why Median Severity and Ordinal Scale Severity Values should not be used for Injury Burden Results: A Critical Review
Warum Schweregradwerte auf der Median- und Ordinalskala nicht für Ergebnisse der Verletzungsbelastung verwendet werden sollten: Eine kritische BetrachtungAbstract
Injury burden is a composite measure of injury incidence and mean severity; this parameter has been reported as an output measure from injury surveillance studies in rugby for over 20 years. The benefits of reporting injury burden results have, more recently, been recognised in other sports. This wider use of injury burden as an output measure from injury surveillance studies has, however, highlighted misunderstandings about how to calculate, present and interpret injury burden data. The aim of this critical review is to explain why median severity and ordinal severity scales should not be used to calculate and report injury burden results in injury surveillance studies. Equations are presented to show how injury burden results should be calculated, and graphs and tables are presented to explain the errors that are introduced when median severity and ordinal scales of severity are used instead of mean severity. This critical review is intended to highlight the correct procedures for calculating, reporting and interpreting injury burden results in order to avoid incorrect results, conclusions and injury prevention recommendations being published.
Zusammenfassung
Die Verletzungslast ist ein zusammengesetztes Maß für die Verletzungshäufigkeit und den durchschnittlichen Schweregrad von Verletzungen; dieser Parameter wird seit mehr als 20 Jahren als Ergebnis von Studien zur Überwachung von Verletzungen im Rugby verwendet. Die Vorteile der Auswertung der Verletzungslast wurden in jüngerer Zeit auch in anderen Sportarten übernommen. Diese breitere Verwendung der Verletzungslast als Ergebnisgröße von Überwachungsstudien hat jedoch Missverständnisse über die Berechnung, Darstellung und Interpretation von Verletzungslastdaten zutage gefördert. Ziel dieser kritischen Überprüfung ist es, zu erklären, warum Medianwichtung und ordinale Schweregradskalen nicht zur Berechnung und Meldung von Verletzungslast-Ergebnissen in Verletzungsüberwachungsstudien verwendet werden sollten. Es werden Gleichungen vorgestellt, um zu zeigen, wie die Ergebnisse der Verletzungslast berechnet werden sollten, und es werden Diagramme und Tabellen vorgestellt, um die Fehler zu erklären, die entstehen, wenn Medianwichtung und ordinale Schweregradskalen anstelle der Mittelwert-Schwere verwendet werden. Diese kritische Überprüfung soll die korrekten Verfahren für die Berechnung, Berichterstattung und Interpretation der Ergebnisse zur Verletzungsbelastung aufzeigen, um die Veröffentlichung falscher Ergebnisse, Schlussfolgerungen und Empfehlungen zur Verletzungsprävention zu vermeiden.
Publikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 22. September 2022
Angenommen nach Revision: 09. November 2022
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
27. November 2024
© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Fuller CW. Catastrophic injury in rugby union: is the level of risk acceptable?. Sports Med 2008; 38: 975-986
- 2 Fernandes GS, Parekh SM, Moses JP. et al. Prevalence of knee pain, radiographic osteoarthritis and arthroplasty in retired professional footballers compared to the general population: A cross-sectional study. Br J Sports Med 2018; 52: 678-683
- 3 Fuller CW, Drawer S. The application of risk management in sport. Sports Med 2004; 34: 349-356
- 4 Fuller CW, Junge A, Dvorak J. Risk management: FIFA’s approach for protecting the health of football players. Br J Sports Med 2012; 46: 11-17
- 5 Fuller CW, Vassie LH. Health and Safety Management: Principles and Best Practice. Harlow: FT Prentice Hall; 2004
- 6 Fuller CW. Assessing the return on investment of injury prevention procedures in professional football. Sports Med 2019; 49: 621-629
- 7 Fuller CW. Managing the risk of injury in sport. Clin J Sport Med 2007; 17: 182-187
- 8 Drawer S, Fuller CW. Evaluating the level of injury in English professional football using a risk based assessment process. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 446-451
- 9 Palmer-Green D, Hunter G, Jaques R. et al. Methods for epidemiological study of injury and illness in Great Britain Olympic sport: the injury/illness performance project. Proceedings of the IOC World Conference on Prevention of Injury & Illness in Sport, Monte-Carlo, Monaco, April 2011. Abstract available at: Br J Sports Med 2011; 45: 367
- 10 Palmer-Green D, Fuller CW, Jaques R. et al. The Injury/Illness Performance project (IIPP): A novel epidemiological approach for recording the consequences of sports injuries and illnesses. J Sports Med (Hindawi Publ Corp) 2013; 2013: 523974
- 11 Orchard JW, Newman D, Stretch R. et al. Methods for injury surveillance in international cricket. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: e22
- 12 Fuller CW, Ekstrand J, Junge A. et al. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Clin J Sport Med 2006; 16: 97-106
- 13 Fuller CW, Molloy MG, Bagate C. et al. Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures for studies of injuries in rugby union. Clin J Sport Med 2007; 17: 177-181
- 14 Brooks JHM, Fuller CW, Kemp SPT. et al. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: Part 1 – Match injuries. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 757-766
- 15 Quarrie KL, Hopkins WG. Tackle injuries in professional rugby union. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36: 1705-1716
- 16 Fuller CW, Taylor A. Eight season epidemiological study of match injuries in women’s international rugby sevens. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 865-874
- 17 Bahr R, Clarsen B, Derman W. et al. International Olympic Committee consensus statement: methods for recording and reporting of epidemiological data on injury and illness in sports 2020. Br J Sports Med 2020; 54: 372-389
- 18 Fuller CW. Injury risk (burden), risk matrices and risk contours in team sports: a review of principles, practices and problems. Sports Med 2018; 48: 1597-1606
- 19 Cohen L, Holliday M. Practical Statistics for Students. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd; 1998
- 20 Materne O, Chamari K, Farooq A. et al. Shedding light on incidence and burden of physeal injuries in a youth elite football academy: a 4-season prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2022; 32: 165-176
- 21 Materne O, Chamari K, Farooq A. et al. Injury incidence and burden in youth elite football academy: a four-season prospective study of 551 players aged from under 9 to under 19 years. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 493-500
- 22 Wik EH, Lolli L, Chamari K. et al. Injury patterns differ with age in male youth football: a four-season prospective study of 1111 time-loss injuries in an elite national academy. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 794-800
- 23 Nordstrom A, Bahr R, Talsnes O. et al. Prevalence and burden of health problems in male elite ice hockey players. A prospective study in the Norwegian professional league. Orthop J Sports Med 2020; 8: 2325967120902407
- 24 Nordstrom A, Bahr R, Clarsen B. et al. Prevalence and burden of self-reported health problems in male elite ice hockey players: a 44-week prospective cohort study. Am J Sports Med 2021; 49: 3379-3385
- 25 Worner T, Thorberg K, Clarsen B. et al. Incidence, prevalence, severity and risk factors for hip and groin problems in Swedish male ice hockey: a one-season prospective cohort study. J Athl Train 2022; 57: 72-78
- 26 Mann RH, Clarsen BM, McKay CD. et al. Prevalence and burden of health problems in competitive adolescent distance runners: a 6-month prospective cohort study. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 1366-1375
- 27 Martinez-Silvan D, Wik EH, Alonso JM. et al. Injury characteristics in male youth athletics: a five-season prospective study in a full-time sports academy. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 954-960
- 28 Gram MCD, Clarsen BM, Bo K. Injuries and illnesses among competitive Norwegian rhythmic gymnasts during preseason: a prospective cohort study of prevalence, incidence and risk factors. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 231-236
- 29 Clarsen B, Steffen K, Berge HM. et al. R. Methods, challenges and benefits of a health monitoring programme for Norwegian Olympic and Paralympic athletes: the road from London 2012 to Tokyo 2020. Br J Sports Med 2021; 55: 1342-1349
- 30 Steffen K, Clarsen B, Gjelsvik H. et al. Illness and injury among Norwegian Para athletes over five consecutive Paralympic Summer and Winter Games cycles: prevailing high illness burden on the road from 2012 to 2020. Br J Sports Med 2022; 56: 204-212