Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(11): 1469-1475
DOI: 10.1055/a-2295-3412
SMFM Fellows Research Series

Predictors of Breastfeeding among Women Admitted with Severe Preeclampsia before 34 Weeks

Sara J. Grundy
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Carmen M. Avram
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
,
Alice Darling
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Gregory Zemtsov
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
,
Sarah K. Dotters-Katz
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective Patients with severe preeclampsia (sPREX) face barriers to successful breastfeeding (BF), including an increased risk of maternal and newborn complications, prematurity, and low birth weight. Patients with early-onset sPREX (before 34 weeks' gestation) may be at even greater risk, yet there are little data available on factors associated with BF challenges in this population. We describe rates of BF initiation at hospital discharge and BF continuation at postpartum (PP) visit and identify factors associated with BF noninitiation and BF cessation among patients admitted with early-onset sPREX.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study of women with sPREX admitted at less than 34 weeks' gestation to a single tertiary center (2013–2019). Demographic, antepartum, and delivery characteristics were evaluated. Factors associated with BF noninitiation at maternal discharge and with BF cessation at routine PP were assessed. Patients with intrauterine or neonatal demise and those missing BF data were excluded. Bivariate statistics were used to compare characteristics and Poisson regression was used to estimate relative risks (RR).

Results Of 255 patients with early-onset sPREX, 228 (89.4%) had BF initiation at maternal hospital discharge. Initiation of BF occurred less frequently among patients with tobacco use in pregnancy (7.5 vs. 37.0%, χ 2, p < 0.001, RR: 0.69 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.52–0.92]). At 6 weeks' PP, 159 of 199 (79.9%) patients had BF continuation. Maternal age under 20 years (1.9 vs. 17.5%, χ 2, p = 0.01, RR: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.14–0.91]) and experiencing maternal morbidity (25.2 vs. 45.0%, χ 2, p = 0.01, RR: 0.80 [95% CI: 0.66–0.96]) were associated with BF cessation at the PP visit.

Conclusion Among patients with early sPREX, tobacco use in pregnancy was associated with noninitiation of BF at discharge, whereas young maternal age and maternal morbidity were associated with cessation of BF by routine PP visit. Further research is needed on how to support BF in this population, especially among patients with these associated factors.

Key Points

  • Tobacco use was associated with BF noninitiation in patients with early preeclampsia.

  • Maternal age < 20 and maternal morbidity were associated with BF cessation by PP visit.

  • BF support for patients with risk factors is important for BF success PP.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 26 August 2022

Accepted: 24 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
26 March 2024

Article published online:
11 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Breast cancer and breastfeeding: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 47 epidemiological studies in 30 countries, including 50302 women with breast cancer and 96973 women without the disease. Lancet 2002; 360 (9328) 187-195
  • 2 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breastfeeding Report Card: United States,. 2020 . Accessed April 1, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/reportcard.htm
  • 3 Cohen SS, Alexander DD, Krebs NF. et al. Factors associated with breastfeeding initiation and continuation: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr 2018; 203: 190-196.e21
  • 4 Ananth CV, Keyes KM, Wapner RJ. Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis. BMJ 2013; 347: f6564
  • 5 Kongwattanakul K, Saksiriwuttho P, Chaiyarach S, Thepsuthammarat K. Incidence, characteristics, maternal complications, and perinatal outcomes associated with preeclampsia with severe features and HELLP syndrome. Int J Womens Health 2018; 10: 371-377
  • 6 Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Incidence of preeclampsia: risk factors and outcomes associated with early- versus late-onset disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013; 209 (06) 544.e1-544.e12
  • 7 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice Bulletin: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Number 222. June 2020 . Accessed April 1, 2024 at: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2020/06/gestational-hypertension-and-preeclampsia
  • 8 Holcomb Jr WL, Chaiworapongsa T, Luke DA, Burgdorf KD. An odd measure of risk: use and misuse of the odds ratio. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 98 (04) 685-688
  • 9 Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159 (07) 702-706
  • 10 Yelland LN, Salter AB, Ryan P. Performance of the modified Poisson regression approach for estimating relative risks from clustered prospective data. Am J Epidemiol 2011; 174 (08) 984-992
  • 11 Cordero L, Stenger MR, Landon MB, Nankervis CA. Breastfeeding initiation among women with preeclampsia with and without severe features. J Neonatal Perinatal Med 2021; 14 (03) 419-426
  • 12 Facts: key breastfeeding indicators. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed April 1, 2024 at: https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/facts.html
  • 13 Cordero L, Valentine CJ, Samuels P, Giannone PJ, Nankervis CA. Breastfeeding in women with severe preeclampsia. Breastfeed Med 2012; 7 (06) 457-463
  • 14 Mennella JA, Yourshaw LM, Morgan LK. Breastfeeding and smoking: short-term effects on infant feeding and sleep. Pediatrics 2007; 120 (03) 497-502
  • 15 MGH Center for Women's Mental Health. Smoking while breastfeeding: what are the risks?. Accessed January 22, 2008 at: https://womensmentalhealth.org/posts/smoking-while-breastfeeding-what-are-the-risks/
  • 16 Gianni ML, Bettinelli ME, Manfra P. et al. Breastfeeding difficulties and risk for early breastfeeding cessation. Nutrients 2019; 11 (10) 2266
  • 17 Brown CRL, Dodds L, Legge A, Bryanton J, Semenic S. Factors influencing the reasons why mothers stop breastfeeding. Can J Public Health 2014; 105 (03) e179-e185
  • 18 Briere CE, McGrath J, Cong X, Cusson R. An integrative review of factors that influence breastfeeding duration for premature infants after NICU hospitalization. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2014; 43 (03) 272-281
  • 19 Black A. Breastfeeding the premature infant and nursing implications. Adv Neonatal Care 2012; 12 (01) 10-11
  • 20 Callen J, Pinelli J. A review of the literature examining the benefits and challenges, incidence and duration, and barriers to breastfeeding in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care 2005; 5 (02) 72-88 , quiz 89–92
  • 21 Chen CH, Wang TM, Chang HM, Chi CS. The effect of breast- and bottle-feeding on oxygen saturation and body temperature in preterm infants. J Hum Lact 2000; 16 (01) 21-27
  • 22 Promoting baby friendly hospitals. World Health Organization. Accessed April 1, 2024 at: https://www.who.int/activities/promoting-baby-friendly-hospitals
  • 23 Nyqvist KH, Häggkvist AP, Hansen MN. et al; Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative Expert Group. Expansion of the baby-friendly hospital initiative ten steps to successful breastfeeding into neonatal intensive care: expert group recommendations. J Hum Lact 2013; 29 (03) 300-309