Network Analysis of Past Presidents of the North American Skull Base Society

Abstract

Background Little is known about the relative contributions and interactions of the past presidents of the North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) and skull base centers.

Objectives (1) Measure academic contributions of past presidents; (2) identify influential nodes of academic collaboration; (3) identify opportunities for future collaboration.

Methods Peer-reviewed publications of past presidents of NASBS from 1964 to July 2019 were identified using Scopus author name search. Network structures were constructed and analyzed using the graph-tool python library to produce a weighted co-authorship network base and compute centrality measures. Girvan–Newman clustering was applied to identify community structure. Network maps were then produced using Gephi network visualization software with force-directed layout algorithms.

Results The coauthor network of 29 presidents was fully connected, with a maximum shortest-path distance between presidents of 5. The mean number of connections from each node without respect to weighting was 5.31 (standard deviation [SD]: 3.53), and the mean number of connections with weighting was 8.40 (SD: 7.28). The number of unweighted connections ranged from 1 to 14 and weighted connections ranged from 0.25 to 24.7. Girvan–Newman clustering identified three communities with two that covered 93% of the network. The largest communities contained 14 and 13 presidents. The number of connections was correlated with h-index, both unweighted (r ² = 0.34) and weighted (r ² = 0.26).

Conclusion Network mapping of past presidents of the NASBS helps to capture the history of the NASBS and reveals areas of concentration and influence within the specialty.

Keywords

skull base - presidents - network - history

Publication History

Received: 22 February 2024

Accepted: 31 March 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
02 April 2024

Article published online:
25 April 2024

• References

• 1 Luebs J, Snyderman C. Network analysis of past NASBS presidents. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81: A099
• 2 Newman MEJ. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98 (02) 404-409
• 3 Kondrak G. N-gram similarity and distance. In: Consens M, Navarro G. eds. String Processing and Information Retrieval. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer; 2005: 115-126
• 4 Peixoto TP. The graph-tool python library. figshare. Dataset. Posted May 27, 2017. Accessed October 22, 2023 at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1164194.v14
• 5 Newman MEJ. Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2001; 64 (1, Pt 2): 016132
• 6 Girvan M, Newman MEJ. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002; 99 (12) 7821-7826
• 7 Bastian M, Heymann S, Jacomy M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc Int AAAI Conf Web Soc Media 2009; 3: 361-362
• 8 Choudhri AF, Siddiqui A, Khan NR, Cohen HL. Understanding bibliometric parameters and analysis. Radiographics 2015; 35 (03) 736-746