Rofo 2025; 197(02): 186-195
DOI: 10.1055/a-2301-3349
Quality/Quality Assurance

Structured reporting for efficient epidemiological and in-hospital prevalence analysis of pulmonary embolisms

Article in several languages: English | deutsch
Tobias Jorg
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Dirk Graafen
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Lukas Hobohm
2   Center for Cardiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Christoph Düber
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Peter Mildenberger
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
,
Lukas Müller
1   Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany (Ringgold ID: RIN39068)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Purpose

Structured reporting (SR) not only offers advantages regarding report quality but, as an IT-based method, also the opportunity to aggregate and analyze large, highly structured datasets (data mining). In this study, a data mining algorithm was used to calculate epidemiological data and in-hospital prevalence statistics of pulmonary embolism (PE) by analyzing structured CT reports.

Methods

All structured reports for PE CT scans from the last 5 years (n = 2790) were extracted from the SR database and analyzed. The prevalence of PE was calculated for the entire cohort and stratified by referral type and clinical referrer. Distributions of the manifestation of PEs (central, lobar, segmental, subsegmental, as well as left-sided, right-sided, bilateral) were calculated, and the occurrence of right heart strain was correlated with the manifestation.

Results

The prevalence of PE in the entire cohort was 24% (n = 678). The median age of PE patients was 71 years (IQR 58–80), and the sex distribution was 1.2/1 (M/F). Outpatients showed a lower prevalence of 23% compared to patients from regular wards (27%) and intensive care units (30%). Surgically referred patients had a higher prevalence than patients from internal medicine (34% vs. 22%). Patients with central and bilateral PEs had a significantly higher occurrence of right heart strain compared to patients with peripheral and unilateral embolisms.

Conclusion

Data mining of structured reports is a simple method for obtaining prevalence statistics, epidemiological data, and the distribution of disease characteristics, as demonstrated by the PE use case. The generated data can be helpful for multiple purposes, such as for internal clinical quality assurance and scientific analyses. To benefit from this, consistent use of SR is required and is therefore recommended.

Key Points

  • SR-based data mining allows simple epidemiologic analyses for PE.

  • The prevalence of PE differs between outpatients and inpatients.

  • Central and bilateral PEs have an increased risk of right heart strain.

Citation Format

  • Jorg T, Halfmann MC, Graafen D et al. Structured reporting for efficient epidemiological and in-hospital prevalence analysis of pulmonary embolisms. Rofo 2025; 197: 186–195



Publication History

Received: 20 September 2023

Accepted after revision: 26 March 2024

Article published online:
28 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Licha CRM, McCurdy CM, Maldonado SM. et al. Current management of acute pulmonary embolism. Ann. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg 2020; 26: 65-71
  • 2 Bĕlohlávek J, Dytrych V, Linhart A. Pulmonary embolism, part I: Epidemiology, risk factors and risk stratification, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and nonthrombotic pulmonary embolism. . Exp. Clin. Cardiol 2013; 18 (02) 129-138
  • 3 Duffett L, Castellucci LA, Forgie MA. Pulmonary embolism: Update on management and controversies. BMJ 2020; 370: m2177
  • 4 Sin D, McLennan G, Rengier F. et al. Acute pulmonary embolism multimodality imaging prior to endovascular therapy. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2021; 37: 343-358
  • 5 Moore AJE, Wachsmann J, Chamarthy MR. et al. Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism: An update. . Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther 2018; 8: 225-243
  • 6 Brook OR, Brook A, Vollmer CM. et al. HEALTH POLICY AND PRACTICE: Structured Reporting of Multiphasic CT for Pancreatic Cancer Brook et al. Radiology 2015; 274: 464-472
  • 7 Schoeppe F, Sommer WH, Nörenberg D. et al. Structured reporting adds clinical value in primary CT staging of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Eur. Radiol 2018; 28: 3702-3709
  • 8 Jorg T, Heckmann JC, Mildenberger P. et al. Structured reporting of CT scans of patients with trauma leads to faster, more detailed diagnoses: An experimental study. Eur. J. Radiol 2021; 144: 109954
  • 9 Sabel BO, Plum JL, Kneidinger N. et al. Structured reporting of CT examinations in acute pulmonary embolism. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr 2017; 11: 188-195
  • 10 Jorg T, Halfmann MC, Arnhold G. et al. Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience. Insights Imaging 2023; 14: 61
  • 11 Pinto dos Santos D, Kotter E. Structured radiology reporting on an institutional level – benefit or new administrative burden?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci 2018; 1434: 274-281
  • 12 Sistrom CL. Conceptual approach for the design of radiology reporting interfaces: The talking template. J. Digit. Imaging 2005; 18: 176-187
  • 13 Dos Santos DP, Scheibl S, Arnhold G. et al. A proof of concept for epidemiological research using structured reporting with pulmonary embolism as a use case. Br. J. Radiol 2018; 91: 1088
  • 14 Jorg T, Halfmann MC, Rölz N. et al. Structured reporting in radiology enables epidemiological analysis through data mining: urolithiasis as a use case. Abdom. Radiol 2023; 48: 3520-3529
  • 15 Fink MA, Mayer VL, Schneider T. et al. CT Angiography Clot Burden Score from Data Mining of Structured Reports for Pulmonary Embolism. Radiology 2022; 302: 175-184
  • 16 Hempel JM, Pinto dos Santos D. Structured reporting and artificial intelligence. Radiologe 2021; 61: 999-1004
  • 17 Pinto dos Santos D, Klos G, Kloeckner R. et al. Development of an IHE MRRT-compliant open-source web-based reporting platform. Eur. Radiol 2017; 27: 424-430
  • 18 Konstantinides S V, Meyer G, Becattini C. et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS). Eur. Heart J 2020; 41: 543-603
  • 19 Raptis DG, Gourgoulianis KI, Daniil Z. et al. Time trends for pulmonary embolism incidence in Greece. . Thromb. J 2020; 18: 1-9
  • 20 Keller K, Hobohm L, Ebner M. et al. Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany. Eur. Heart J 2020; 41: 522-529
  • 21 Jarman AF, Mumma BE, Singh KS. et al. Crucial considerations: Sex differences in the epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in non-pregnant adult patients. J. Am. Coll. Emerg. Physicians Open 2021; 2: 1-9
  • 22 Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP. et al. The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch. Intern. Med 2009; 169: 1961-1965
  • 23 Hariharan P, Dudzinski DM, Rosovsky R. et al. Relation Among Clot Burden, Right-Sided Heart Strain, and Adverse Events After Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Am. J. Cardiol 2016; 118: 1568-1573
  • 24 Monreal M, Mahé I, Bura-Riviere A. et al. Pulmonary embolism: Epidemiology and registries. Presse Med 2015; 44: e377-e383
  • 25 Huhdanpaa HT, Tan WK, Rundell SD. et al. Using Natural Language Processing of Free-Text Radiology Reports to Identify Type 1 Modic Endplate Changes. J. Digit. Imaging 2018; 31: 84-90
  • 26 Casey A, Davidson E, Poon M. et al. A systematic review of natural language processing applied to radiology reports. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak 2021; 21: 179
  • 27 Jungmann F, Kämpgen B, Mildenberger P. et al. Towards data-driven medical imaging using natural language processing in patients with suspected urolithiasis. Int. J. Med. Inform 2020; 137: 104106
  • 28 Adams LC, Truhn D, Busch F. et al. Leveraging GPT-4 for Post Hoc Transformation of Free-Text Radiology Reports into Structured Reporting: A Multilingual Feasibility Study. Radiology 2023; 307 (04) 230725
  • 29 Jorg T, Kämpgen B, Feiler D. et al. Efficient structured reporting in radiology using an intelligent dialogue system based on speech recognition and natural language processing. Insights Imaging 2023; 14: 47
  • 30 Das M, Wildberger JE. Diagnostik der akuten Lungenembolie: Ein Update. Radiologe 2016; 56: 543-556