PDF herunterladen
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(16): 2222-2228
DOI: 10.1055/a-2302-7334
Original Article

Implementation and Clinical Impact of a Guideline for Standardized, Evidence-Based Induction of Labor

Authors

  • Jourdan E. Triebwasser

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • LeAnn Louis

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Joanne M. Bailey

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Leah Mitchell-Solomon

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Anita M. Malone

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Rebecca F. Hamm 

    2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Michelle H. Moniz

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

  • Molly J. Stout

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

Funding None.
Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints
Preview

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of implementation of an induction of labor (IOL) guideline on IOL length and utilization of evidence-based practices.

Study Design We conducted a quality improvement project to increase utilization of three evidence-based IOL practices: combined agent ripening, vaginal misoprostol, and early amniotomy. Singletons with intact membranes and cervical dilation ≤2 cm admitted for IOL were included. Primary outcome was IOL length. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and practice utilization. We compared preimplementation (PRE; November 1, 2021 through January 31, 2022) to postimplementation (POST; March 1, 2022 through April 30, 2022) with sensitivity analyses by self-reported race and ethnicity. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression were used to test the association between period and outcomes.

Results Among 495 birthing people (PRE, n = 293; POST, n = 202), IOL length was shorter POST (22.0 vs. 18.3 h, p = 0.003), with faster time to delivery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.38, 95% CI: 1.15–1.66), more birthing people delivered within 24 hours (57 vs. 68.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.90 [95% CI: 1.25–2.89]), and no difference in cesarean. Utilization of combined agent ripening (31.1 vs. 42.6%, p = 0.009), vaginal misoprostol (34.5 vs. 68.3%, p < 0.001), and early amniotomy (19.1 vs. 31.7%, p = 0.001) increased POST.

Conclusion Implementation of an evidence-based IOL guideline is associated with shorter induction time. Additional implementation efforts to increase adoption of practices are needed to optimize outcomes after IOL.

Key Points

  • Implementation of an IOL guideline is associated with faster time to delivery.

  • Evidence-based induction practices were used more often after guideline implementation.

  • Adoption of evidence-based induction practices is variable even with a guideline.

Keywords

induction of labor - evidence-based practices - guideline - implementation - combined agent ripening - misoprostol - early amniotomy

Note

This study was presented in part as two poster abstracts at the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine 44th Annual Meeting in National Harbor, MD, February 10–14, 2024.




Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 12. März 2024

Angenommen: 24. März 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
09. April 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
09. Mai 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA