Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(11): 829-836
DOI: 10.1055/a-2304-3694
Training & Testing

Relationship between Workload, Psychological State and Recovery in Female Soccer Athletes

John William Long
1   Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, United States
,
Denver Brown
2   Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at San Antonio, College for Health, Community, and Policy, San Antonio, United States
,
John Farrell
3   Department of Health and Human Performance, Texas State University San Marcos, San Marcos, United States
,
Matthew Gonzalez
4   Translational Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
5   Kinesiology Department, The University of Texas at San Antonio, College for Health, Community and Policy, San Antonio, United States
,
Kelly Cheever
5   Kinesiology Department, The University of Texas at San Antonio, College for Health, Community and Policy, San Antonio, United States
6   Human Performance Research Interest Group, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, United States
› Institutsangaben
Preview

Abstract

This study assessed the multifaceted relations between measures of workload, psychological state, and recovery throughout an entire soccer season in female collegiate soccer athletes (19.8±1.2 yrs, 132±12.3 lbs, 63±3.2 in). A prospective longitudinal study was utilized to measure workload (GPS training load, Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE), psychological state (mental stress, mental fatigue, and mood), and recovery (sleep duration, sleep quality, and soreness), during 90 observations (59 training sessions and 21 games). Separate linear-mixed effect models were used to assess outcomes of RPE, soreness, and sleep duration. A linear mixed-effects model explained 59% of the variance in RPE following each session. Specifically, each standard deviation increase in GPS load and mental stress in the morning prior to training increased RPE by 1.46 (SE=0.08) and 0.29 (SE=0.07), respectively, following that day’s training. Furthermore, a significant interaction was found between several predictor variables and chronological day in the season while predicting RPE. Specifically, for each standard deviation increase in GPS load, RPE went up by 0.0055 per day during the season suggesting that load had a higher impact on RPE as the season progressed. In contrast, the interaction of day by mental stress, sleep duration, and soreness continued to be stronger as the season progressed. Each linear mixed-effect model predicted a larger amount of variance when accounting for individual variations in the random effects.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 16. Januar 2024

Angenommen: 10. April 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
10. April 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
31. Juli 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany