Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2308-7384
Navigating the Future of Organisational Health Services Research in Germany and beyond: a Position Paper
Article in several languages: English | deutsch Funding Information Volkswagen Foundation — http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001663; 9C547Abstract
Background Recent analyses have shown that in health services research in Germany, healthcare organisations are often considered primarily as a study setting, without fully taking their complex organisational nature into account, neither theoretically nor methodologically. Therefore, an initiative was launched to analyse the state of Organisational Health Services Research (OHSR) in Germany and to develop a strategic framework and road map to guide future efforts in the field. This paper summarizes positions that have been jointly developed by consulting experts from the interdisciplinary and international scientific community.
Methods In July 2023, a scoping workshop over the course of three days was held with 32 (inter)national experts from different research fields centred around OHSR topics using interactive workshop methods. Participants discussed their perspectives on OHSR, analysed current challenges in OHSR in Germany and developed key positions for the field’s development.
Results The seven agreed-upon key positions addressed conceptual and strategic aspects. There was consensus that the field required the development of a research agenda that can guide future efforts. On a conceptual level, the need to address challenges in terms of interdisciplinarity, terminology, organisation(s) as research subjects, international comparative research and utilisation of organisational theory was recognized. On a strategic level, requirements with regard to teaching, promotion of interdisciplinary and international collaboration, suitable funding opportunities and participatory research were identified.
Conclusions This position paper seeks to serve as a framework to support further development of OHSR in Germany and as a guide for researchers and funding organisations on how to move OHSR forward. Some of the challenges discussed for German OHSR are equally present in other countries. Thus, this position paper can be used to initiate fruitful discussions in other countries.
Keywords
Healthcare organisations - organisational behaviour - organisational research - health services research - interdisciplinary - international networkPublication History
Article published online:
22 July 2024
© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
Literatur
- 1 Ansmann L, Baumann W, Gostomzyk J. et al. DNVF-Memorandum III – Methoden für die Versorgungsforschung, Teil 4 – Konzept und Methoden der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung. Kapitel 1 – Definition und Konzept der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung. Gesundheitswesen 2019; 81: e64-e71
- 2 Homeland Security Digital Library (HSDL): United States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (28.10.2022). Online source: https://www.hsdl.org/c/abstract/?docid=442105 Date: 13.12.2023
- 3 Pfaff H, Albert US, Bornemann R. et al. Methoden für die organisationsbezogene Versorgungsforschung. Gesundheitswesen 2009; 71: 777-790
- 4 Rölker-Denker L, Kowalski C, Ansmann L. et al. DNVF-Memorandum III – Methoden für die Versorgungsforschung, Teil 4 – Konzept und Methoden der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung. Kapitel 2 – Methodische Ansätze der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung: Zielgrößen, Datenquellen, Datenerhebung und Datenanalyse. Gesundheitswesen 2019; 81: e72-e81
- 5 Wirtz MA, Bitzer EM, Albert US. et al. DNVF-Memorandum III – Methoden für die Versorgungsforschung, Teil 4 – Konzept und Methoden der organisationsbezogenen Versorgungsforschung. Kapitel 3 – Methodische Ansätze zur Evaluation und Implementierung komplexer Interventionen in Versorgungsorganisationen. Gesundheitswesen 2019; 81: e82-e91
- 6 Körner M, Ansmann L, Schwarz B. et al. eds. Organizational behaviour in healthcare: Theoretical approaches, methods and empirical results. Band 28. Medizinsoziologie. Zürich; LIT: 2018
- 7 Nöst S, Miedaner F, Wagner A. et al. Organisationbezogene Versorgungsforschung im Deutschen Netzwerk für Versorgungsforschung. Ein Scoping Review [German Medical Science GMS Publishing House]. 21. Deutscher Kongress für Versorgungsforschung (DKVF) 2022;
- 8 Nöst S, Miedaner F, Wagner A. et al. To what extent does Health Services Research in Germany engage with Organisational Behaviour Research? A scoping review based on an analysis of conference abstracts. Presentation of a Working Paper. 13th Organisational Behaviour in Health Care conference. Birmingham. 2022
- 9 Exworthy M, Mannion R. Organisational behaviour in health care: a semi-detached home and an orphan? Paper presented to the 13th PBHC conference, University of Birmingham. Presentation of a Working Paper. 13th Organisational Behaviour in Health Care conference. Birmingham. 2022
- 10 Greenhalgh J, Manzano A. Understanding ‘context’ in realist evaluation and synthesis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 2022; 25: 583-595
- 11 Loschen C, Luzay L, Böker M. et al. The Significance of Organizational Characteristics of German Healthcare Facilities for the Quality of Patient Treatment -a Systematic Review. In: Körner M, Ansmann L, Schwarz B et al. (eds.). Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare. Theoretical Approaches, Methods and Empirical Results. Zürich: LIT-Verlag; 2018
- 12 Robbins SP, Judge TA. Organizational Behavior. 17th ed. Harlow: Pearson Education; 2016
- 13 Greenwood R, Oliver C, Lawrence TB. et al. eds. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. 2nd ed. Los Angeles, Calif., London, New Dehli, Singapore, Washington DC, Melbourne: SAGE Reference; 2017
- 14 Gavetti G, Greve HR, Levinthal DA. et al. The Behavioral Theory of the Firm: Assessment and Prospects. The Academy of Management Annals 2012; 6: 1-40
- 15 Tasselli S, Kilduff M. Network Agency. The Academy of Management Annals 2021; 15: 68-110
- 16 Luhmann N. Hrsg. Soziologische Aufklärung 2. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 1975.
- 17 Ernstmann N, Kuske S, Holmberg C. et al. Empfehlungen für ein Kerncurriculum für Masterstudiengänge der Versorgungsforschung. Gesundheitswesen 2023; 85: 133-138
- 18 Kuske S, Holmberg C, Wensing M. et al. Studiengänge zur Versorgungsforschung in Deutschland: aktueller Stand und zukünftige Perspektiven. Gesundheitswesen 2022; 84: 227-241
- 19 Burgess JF, Menachemi N, Maciejewski ML. Update on the Health Services Research Doctoral Core Competencies. Health Serv Res 2018; 53: 3985-4003
- 20 Wensing M, Grol R, Grimshaw J. eds. Improving patient care: The implementation of change in health care. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell; 2020
- 21 Bush PL, Pluye P, Loignon C. et al. Organizational participatory research: a systematic mixed studies review exposing its extra benefits and the key factors associated with them. Implement Sci 2017; 12: 119
- 22 Béland S, Lambert M, Delahunty-Pike A. et al. Patient and researcher experiences of patient engagement in primary care health care research: A participatory qualitative study. Health Expect 2022; 25: 2365-2376
- 23 Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E. et al. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci 2018; 13: 98