Aktuelle Trends bei der Implantation der Touch-Prothese am
                    Daumensattelgelenk: Ergebnisse des 1. deutschsprachigen
                    Anwendertreffens

Daniel B. Herren; Jean-Yves Beaulieu; Maurizio Calcagni; Christoph Erling; Martin Jung; Axel Kaulich; Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor; Michaël Papaloïzos; Anton Rosenkranz; Esther Vögelin; Miriam Marks

doi:10.1055/a-2321-9426

Subscribe to RSS

Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.

https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00000023.xml

Share / Bookmark

Facebook X Linkedin Weibo

Download PDF

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2024; 56(03): 201-211
DOI: 10.1055/a-2321-9426

Consensus Statement

Aktuelle Trends bei der Implantation der Touch-Prothese am Daumensattelgelenk: Ergebnisse des 1. deutschsprachigen Anwendertreffens

Current Trends in the Implantation of the Touch Prosthesis at the Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint: Results of the 1^st German-Speaking User Meeting

Daniel B. Herren

¹Handchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland

,

Jean-Yves Beaulieu

²Unité Chirurgie de la main, Hôpitaux universitaires de Genève, Genf, Switzerland

,

Maurizio Calcagni

³Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

,

Christoph Erling

⁴Handchirurgie, Praxis Manus, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland

,

Martin Jung

⁵Handchirurgie, OCM Orthopädische Chirurgie München, München, Germany

,

Axel Kaulich

⁶Handchirurgie, Hanusch Krankenhaus, Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Wien, Austria

,

Marion Mühldorfer-Fodor

⁷Klinik für Handchirurgie, Rhön Klinikum Campus Bad Neustadt, Bad Neustadt, Germany

,

Michaël Papaloïzos

⁸Clinique de la Main, Genf, Switzerland

,

Anton Rosenkranz

⁹Abteilung Orthopädie und Traumatologie, Krankenhaus St. Josef Braunau, Braunau am Inn, Austria

,

Esther Vögelin

¹⁰Universitätsklinik für Plastische- und Handchirurgie, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland

,

Miriam Marks

¹¹Lehre, Forschung und Entwicklung, Schulthess Klinik, Zürich, Switzerland

› Author Affiliations

› Further Information

Also available at

Abstract
Full Text
References

Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Durch die Einführung der neuesten Generation von Daumensattelgelenksprothesen zur Behandlung der Rhizarthrose hat sich das handchirurgische Behandlungsspektrum in den letzten Jahren deutlich erweitert. Der technische Anspruch dieser Operation und die vielen Details, die es zu beachten gilt, bedingen jedoch ein entsprechendes Training und eine damit verbundene Lernkurve. Um Erfahrungen mit der Touch Daumensattelgelenksprothese auszutauschen, haben wir das erste deutschsprachige Anwendertreffen zur Daumensattelgelenksprothetik in Zürich durchgeführt. Nach einigen grundlegenden Einführungsvorträgen zur Biomechanik und zu den Prinzipien der prothetischen Versorgung des Daumensattelgelenkes wurden in interaktiven Expertenrunden die verschiedenen Herausforderungen um die Daumensattelgelenksprothetik diskutiert. Anschließend wurden in Kleingruppen unter kundiger Leitung Fälle besprochen und die jeweiligen Konklusionen im Plenum diskutiert. Die wesentlichen Ergebnisse dieses Symposiums sind in diesem Manuskript zusammengefasst.

Abstract

The introduction of the new generation of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC I) joint implants for the treatment of CMC I osteoarthritis has significantly broadened the scope of hand surgery in recent years. However, the technical demands of the procedure and the many details that need to be considered require appropriate training and a learning curve. To share experiences with the Touch CMC I prosthesis, we held the first German-speaking CMC I joint prosthetics user meeting in Zurich. After some basic introductory lectures on biomechanics and the principles of prosthetic fitting of the CMC I joint, the various challenges associated with CMC I joint prosthetics were discussed in interactive expert panels. Subsequently, cases were discussed in small groups under expert guidance and the respective conclusions were discussed in plenary. The main results of this symposium are summarised in this manuscript.

Schlüsselwörter

Arthroplastik - Endoprothese - Prothese - Daumensattelgelenk - Rhizarthrose

Keywords

arthroplasty - implant - prosthesis - thumb carpometacarpal joint - trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis

Publication History

Received: 22 September 2023

Accepted: 09 April 2024

Article published online:
11 June 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Literatur
1 Chakrabarti AJ, Robinson AH, Gallagher P. De la Caffiniere thumb carpometacarpal replacements. 93 cases at 6 to 16 years follow-up. J Hand Surg Br 1997; 22: 695-698 DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(97)80427-5.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
2 van Cappelle HG, Elzenga P, van Horn JR. Long-term results and loosening analysis of de la Caffiniere replacements of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Am 1999; 24: 476-482 DOI: 10.1053/jhsu.1999.0476.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
3 Guggenheim-Gloor PR, Wachtl SW, Sennwald GR. Prosthetic replacement of the first carpometacarpal joint with a cemented ball and socket prosthesis (de la Caffiniere). Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2000; 32: 134-137 DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-19247.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
4 Moutet F, Lebrun C, Massart P. et al. The Roseland prosthesis. Chir Main 2001; 20: 79-84 DOI: 10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00019-1.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
5 Dunaud JL, Moughabghab M, Benaissa S. et al. Rubis 2 trapezometacarpal prosthesis: concept, operative technique. Chir Main 2001; 20: 85-88 DOI: 10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00020-8.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
6 Isselin J. ARPE prosthesis: preliminary results. Chir Main 2001; 20: 89-92 DOI: 10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00021-x.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
7 Teissier J, Gaudin T, Marc T. Problems with the metacarpophalangeal joint in the surgical treatment of osteoarthritis by inserting an ARPE type joint prosthesis. Chir Main 2001; 20: 68-70 DOI: 10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00016-6.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
8 Schuhl JF. The Roseland prosthesis in the treatment of osteoarthritis. A five years experience with the same surgeon. Chir Main 2001; 20: 75-78 DOI: 10.1016/s1297-3203(01)00008-7.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
9 De Smet L, Sioen W, Spaepen D. et al. Total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the thumb basal joint. Acta Orthop Belg 2004; 70: 19-24

PubMed Google Scholar
10 Brutus JP, Kinnen L. Short term results of total carpometacarpal joint replacement surgery using the ARPE implant for primary ostearthritis of the thumb. Chir Main 2004; 23: 224-228 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2004.08.001.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
11 Jacoulet P. Results of the ARPE trapezometacarpal prosthesis: a retrospective study of 37 cases. Chir Main 2005; 24: 24-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2004.11.003.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
12 Regnard PJ. Electra trapezio metacarpal prosthesis: results of the first 100 cases. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 621-628 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.05.019.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
13 Badia A, Sambandam SN. Total joint arthroplasty in the treatment of advanced stages of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 1605-1614 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.08.008.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
14 Apard T, Saint-Cast Y. Results of a 5 years follow-up of Arpe prosthesis for the basal thumb osteoarthritis. Chir Main 2007; 26: 88-94 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2007.03.005.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
15 Apard T, Saint-Cast Y. Revision of the ARPE prosthesis by the Jones procedure: a study of 6 cases and review of literature. Chir Main 2007; 26: 95-102 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2006.12.002.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
16 Ulrich-Vinther M, Puggaard H, Lange B. Prospective 1-year follow-up study comparing joint prosthesis with tendon interposition arthroplasty in treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33: 1369-1377 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.04.028.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
17 Zollinger PE, Ellis ML, Unal H. et al. Clinical outcome of cementless semi-constrained trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty, and possible effect of vitamin C on the occurrence of complex regional pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Belg 2008; 74: 317-322

PubMed Google Scholar
18 Hansen TB, Snerum L. Elektra trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for treatment of osteoarthrosis of the basal joint of the thumb. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2008; 42: 316-319 DOI: 10.1080/02844310802393974.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
19 Hansen TB, Vainorius D. High loosening rate of the Moje Acamo prosthesis for treating osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2008; 33: 571-574 DOI: 10.1177/1753193408090759.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
20 Lemoine S, Wavreille G, Alnot JY. et al. Second generation GUEPAR total arthroplasty of the thumb basal joint: 50 months follow-up in 84 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95: 63-69 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2008.06.001.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
21 Zollinger PE, Unal H, Ellis ML. et al. Clinical Results of 40 Consecutive Basal Thumb Prostheses and No CRPS Type I After Vitamin C Prophylaxis. Open Orthop J 2010; 4: 62-66 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001004020062.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
22 Hansen TB, Homilius M. Failed total carpometacarpal joint prosthesis of the thumb: results after resection arthroplasty. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2010; 44: 171-174 DOI: 10.3109/02844311.2010.483126.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
23 Klahn A, Nygaard M, Gvozdenovic R. et al. Elektra prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a follow-up of 39 consecutive cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 605-609 DOI: 10.1177/1753193412443501.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
24 Eecken SV, Vanhove W, Hollevoet N. Trapeziometacarpal joint replacement with the Arpe prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg 2012; 78: 724-729

PubMed Google Scholar
25 Kaszap B, Daecke W, Jung M. High frequency failure of the Moje thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 610-616 DOI: 10.1177/1753193412454252.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
26 Johnston P, Getgood A, Larson D. et al. De la Caffiniere thumb trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: 16-26 year follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2012; 37: 621-624 DOI: 10.1177/1753193411433226.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
27 Kubat P, Trtik L. Maia trapeziometacarpal implant for treatment of advanced osteoarthritis of the basal joint of the thumb. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2012; 79: 520-523

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
28 Seng VS, Chantelot C. Isis^® trapeziometacarpal prosthesis in basal thumb osteoarthritis: 30 months follow-up in 30 cases. Chir Main 2013; 32: 8-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2012.12.002.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
29 Jager T, Barbary S, Dap F. et al. Evaluation of postoperative pain and early functional results in the treatment of carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Comparative prospective study of trapeziectomy vs. MAIA^® prosthesis in 74 female patients. Chir Main 2013; 32: 55-62 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2013.02.004.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
30 Goubau JF, Goorens CK, Van Hoonacker P. et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of the Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up: a prospective single-centre cohort study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2013; 38: 866-874 DOI: 10.1177/1753193413488494.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
31 Chug M, Williams N, Benn D. et al. Outcome of uncemented trapeziometacarpal prosthesis for treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint arthritis. Indian J Orthop 2014; 48: 394-398 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.136270.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
32 Krukhaug Y, Lie SA, Havelin LI. et al. The results of 479 thumb carpometacarpal joint replacements reported in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39: 819-825 DOI: 10.1177/1753193413513988.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
33 Martin-Ferrero M. Ten-year long-term results of total joint arthroplasties with ARPE^® implant in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014; 39: 826-832 DOI: 10.1177/1753193413516244.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
34 Schmidt I. Thumb CMC total exchange arthroplasty with the ARPE implant. Chir Main 2014; 33: 295-298 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2014.04.005.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
35 Semere A, Vuillerme N, Corcella D. et al. Results with the Roseland^® HAC trapeziometacarpal prosthesis after more than 10 years. Chir Main 2015; 34: 59-66 DOI: 10.1016/j.main.2015.01.004.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
36 Goubau JF, Goubau L, Goorens CK. et al. De Quervain Tenosynovitis Following Trapeziometacarpal Ball-and-Socket Joint Replacement. J Wrist Surg 2015; 4: 35-42 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1398487.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
37 Huang K, Hollevoet N, Giddins G. Thumb carpometacarpal joint total arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2015; 40: 338-350 DOI: 10.1177/1753193414563243.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
38 Thillemann JK, Thillemann TM, Munk B. et al. High revision rates with the metal-on-metal Motec carpometacarpal joint prosthesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2016; 41: 322-327 DOI: 10.1177/1753193415595527.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
39 Spaans AJ, van Minnen LP, Weijns ME. et al. Retrospective Study of a Series of 20 Ivory Prostheses in the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis. J Wrist Surg 2016; 5: 131-136 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571283.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
40 Bricout M, Rezzouk J. Complications and failures of the trapeziometacarpal Maia^® prosthesis: A series of 156 cases. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35: 190-198 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2016.02.005.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
41 Dehl M, Chelli M, Lippmann S. et al. Results of 115 Rubis II reverse thumb carpometacarpal joint prostheses with a mean follow-up of 10 years. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42: 592-598 DOI: 10.1177/1753193416687508.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
42 Kollig E, Weber W, Bieler D. et al. Failure of an uncemented thumb carpometacarpal joint ceramic prosthesis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2017; 42: 599-604 DOI: 10.1177/1753193416688427.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
43 Cootjans K, Vanhaecke J, Dezillie M. et al. Joint Survival Analysis and Clinical Outcome of Total Joint Arthroplasties With the ARPE Implant in the Treatment of Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis With a Minimal Follow-Up of 5 Years. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 630-638 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.007.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
44 Toffoli A, Teissier J. MAIA Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty: Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of 80 Patients With More than 6 Years of Follow-Up. J Hand Surg Am 2017; 42: 838 e831-838 e838 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.008.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
45 Craik JD, Glasgow S, Andren J. et al. Early Results of the ARPE Arthroplasty Versus Trapeziectomy for the Treatment of Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2017; 22: 472-478 DOI: 10.1142/S0218810417500526.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
46 Zavodsky I, Pavlicny R, Holinka M. Short-Term Results of the Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty Using the Ivory^® Prosthesis. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 2018; 85: 130-136

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
47 Caekebeke P, Duerinckx J. Can surgical guidelines minimize complications after Maia^® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with unconstrained cups?. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43: 420-425 DOI: 10.1177/1753193417741237.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
48 Dreant N, Poumellec MA. Total Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Functional Study of 28 MOOVIS Prostheses. Hand (N Y) 2019; 14: 59-65 DOI: 10.1177/1558944718797341.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
49 Gomez-Garrido D, Trivino-Mayoral V, Delgado-Alcala V. et al. Five year long term results of total joint arthroplasties in the treatment of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis. Acta Biomed 2019; 90: 451-456 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i4.8131.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
50 Andrzejewski A, Ledoux P. Maia^® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty: Survival and clinical outcomes at 5 years' follow-up. Hand Surg Rehabil 2019; 38: 169-173 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.03.004.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
51 Cebrian-Gomez R, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Sebastia-Forcada E. et al. Outcomes of cementless joint prosthesis versus tendon interposition for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: a prospective study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44: 151-158 DOI: 10.1177/1753193418787151.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
52 Vissers G, Goorens CK, Vanmierlo B. et al. Ivory arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 10-year follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44: 138-145 DOI: 10.1177/1753193418797890.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
53 Cootjans K, Dreessen P, Vandenberghe D. et al. Salvage revision arthroplasty after failed TMC joint prosthesis. Acta Orthop Belg 2019; 85: 325-329

PubMed Google Scholar
54 Lerebours A, Marin F, Bouvier S. et al. Trends in Trapeziometacarpal Implant Design: A Systematic Survey Based on Patents and Administrative Databases. J Hand Surg Am 2020; 45: 223-238 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.11.015.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
55 De Smet A, Vanhove W, Benis S. et al. Ten-year outcomes of the Arpe prosthesis for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. Acta Orthop Belg 2020; 86: 131-136

PubMed Google Scholar
56 Froschauer SM, Holzbauer M, Schnelzer RF. et al. Total arthroplasty with Ivory^® prosthesis versus resection-suspension arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study on 82 carpometacarpal-I osteoarthritis patients over 4 years. Eur J Med Res 2020; 25: 13 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-020-00411-8.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
57 Dumartinet-Gibaud R, Bigorre N, Raimbeau G. et al. Arpe total joint arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: 80 thumbs in 63 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 465-469 DOI: 10.1177/1753193420909198.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
58 Tchurukdichian A, Guillier D, Moris V. et al. Results of 110 IVORY^® prostheses for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis with a minimum follow-up of 10 years. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 458-464 DOI: 10.1177/1753193419899843.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
59 Martins A, Charbonnel S, Lecomte F. et al. The Moovis^® implant for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: results after 2 to 6 years. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 477-482 DOI: 10.1177/1753193420901435.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
60 Martin-Ferrero M, Simon-Perez C, Coco-Martin MB. et al. Trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: 199 patients with a minimum of 10 years follow-up. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 443-451 DOI: 10.1177/1753193419871660.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
61 Froschauer SM, Holzbauer M, Hager D. et al. Elektra prosthesis versus resection-suspension arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis: a long-term cohort study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 452-457 DOI: 10.1177/1753193419873230.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
62 Chiche L, Lamarre H, Barbary S. et al. Scaphometacarpal arthroplasty: a report of ten cases of trapeziometacarpal prosthesis and trapeziectomy revision. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2020; 45: 483-487 DOI: 10.1177/1753193419900470.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
63 Remy S, Detrembleur C, Libouton X. et al. Trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: an updated systematic review. Hand Surg Rehabil 2020; 39: 492-501 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.08.005.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
64 Tchurukdichian A, Gerenton B, Moris V. et al. Outcomes of Double-Mobility Prosthesis in Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis With a Minimal 3 Years of Follow-Up: An Advantage for Implant Stability. Hand (N Y) 2021; 16: 368-374 DOI: 10.1177/1558944719855690.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
65 Seaourt AC, Dap F, Dautel G. et al. Comparison between the MAIA^® Implant and Trapeziectomy for Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis: Outcomes at 9 Yearsʼ Follow-Up. J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol 2021; 26: 158-165 DOI: 10.1142/S2424835521500144.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
66 Dremstrup L, Thillemann JK, Kirkeby L. et al. Two-year results of the Moovis trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty with focus on early complications. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 131-140 DOI: 10.1177/1753193420921307.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
67 Froschauer SM, Holzbauer M, Mihalic JA. et al. TOUCH^® Prosthesis for Thumb Carpometacarpal Joint Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Case Series. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 4090 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184090.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
68 Bigorre N, Petit A, Gibaud-Dumartinet R. et al. Revision of Arpe^® trapeziometacarpal prosthesis by isolated head and linear exchange in five patients. Hand Surg Rehabil 2021; 40: 305-308 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.12.009.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
69 Cerlier A, Guinard D, Gay AM. et al. Outcomes of secondary trapeziectomy after revision of trapeziometacarpal implants: a retrospective comparative matched study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 1096-1100 DOI: 10.1177/17531934211039184.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
70 Thorkildsen RD, Reigstad O, Rokkum M. Early dismantling of the polyethylene liner in the Arpe^® trapezial cup: a report of two cases. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 1008-1009 DOI: 10.1177/17531934211012203.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
71 Baek Hansen T. Joint replacement for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: implants and outcomes. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 115-119 DOI: 10.1177/1753193420917582.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
72 Holme TJ, Karbowiak M, Clements J. et al. Thumb CMCJ prosthetic total joint replacement: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 2021; 6: 316-330 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200152.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
73 Cerny MK, Aitzetmueller MM, Stecher L. et al. Geographical differences in carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis treatment of the thumb: A survey of 1138 hand surgeons from the USA and Europe. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74: 1854-1861 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2020.12.040.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
74 Hamasaki T, Harris PG, Bureau NJ. et al. Efficacy of Surgical Interventions for Trapeziometacarpal (Thumb Base) Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review. J Hand Surg Glob Online 2021; 3: 139-148 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.02.003.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
75 Vanmierlo B, Buitenweg J, Vanmierlo T. et al. Ivory Arthroplasty for Trapeziometacarpal Joint Arthritis in Men: Analysis of Clinical Outcome and Implant Survival. Hand (N Y) 2022; 17: 440-446 DOI: 10.1177/1558944720930297.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
76 Theyskens NC, Vandesande W. Dislocation in Single-Mobility Versus Dual-Mobility Trapezometacarpal Joint Prostheses. Hand (N Y) 2022; 15589447221124257 DOI: 10.1177/15589447221124257.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
77 Buffet A, Lucot-Royer L, Pichonnat M. et al. ISIS trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty: What are the outcomes in male patients?. Hand Surg Rehabil 2022; 41: 463-469 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.04.007.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
78 Raj S, Clay R, Ramji S. et al. Trapeziectomy versus joint replacement for first carpometacarpal (CMC 1) joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2022; 32: 1001-1021 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-021-03070-5.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
79 Guerra Bresson H, Desmoineaux P, Maillot C. et al. Survey of practices in surgical management of trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis in France in 2020. Hand Surg Rehabil 2022; 41: 613-623 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2022.06.003.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
80 Newton A, Talwalkar S. Arthroplasty in thumb trapeziometacarpal (CMC joint) osteoarthritis: An alternative to excision arthroplasty. J Orthop 2023; 35: 134-139 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2022.11.011.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
81 Chiche L, Chammas PE, Vial D'Allais P. et al. Long-term survival analysis of 191 MAIA^® prostheses for trapeziometacarpal arthritis. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 101-107 DOI: 10.1177/17531934221136442.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
82 Fauquette PJ, Deken-Delannoy V, Chantelot C. et al. The ISIS^® prosthesis in 77 cases of trapeziometacarpal arthritis: outcomes and survival at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 108-114 DOI: 10.1177/17531934221123166.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
83 Herren DB, Marks M, Neumeister S. et al. Low complication rate and high implant survival at 2 years after Touch^® trapeziometacarpal joint arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 877-883 DOI: 10.1177/17531934231179581.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
84 Lussiez B, Falaise C, Ledoux P. Dual mobility trapeziometacarpal prosthesis: a prospective study of 107 cases with a follow-up of more than 3 years. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2021; 46: 961-967 DOI: 10.1177/17531934211024500.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
85 Ghosh P, Mohammad HR, Martin B. et al. Low polyethylene creep and wear following mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2021; 29: 3433-3442 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06243-7.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
86 Decot B, Manon J, Lambeaux G. et al. Trapeziometacarpal total joint replacement as an alternative to trapeziectomy depends on trapezium height: Retrospective study of 67 patients. Hand Surg Rehabil 2020; 39: 113-119 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.11.012.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
87 Falkner F, Tumkaya AM, Thomas B. et al. Dual mobility prosthesis for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: results from a prospective study of 55 prostheses. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2023; 48: 566-574 DOI: 10.1177/17531934231156280.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
88 Myncke I, Vanhees M, Verstreken F. Unser Behandlungsschema bei Daumensattelgelenksarthrose. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2022; 54: 244-252 DOI: 10.1055/a-1808-7096.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
89 Sukhova I, Megerle K. Wide Awake Local Anesthesia no Tourniquet (WALANT). Handchirurgie Scan 2019; 08: 297-308 DOI: 10.1055/a-0978-3826.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
90 Tchurukdichian A, Lussiez B. Surgical approaches to the trapeziometacarpal joint for the insertion of implants and prostheses (non-arthroscopy). Hand Surg Rehabil 2021; 40S: S29-S32 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2020.10.019.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
91 Reischenböck V, Marks M, Imhof J. et al. Management of the capsule in trapeziometacarpal joint implant arthroplasty: resection versus repair. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2024; DOI: 10.1177/17531934241227788.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
92 Gonzalez-Espino P, Pottier M, Detrembleur C. et al. Touch^® double mobility arthroplasty for trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis: outcomes for 92 prostheses. Hand Surg Rehabil 2021; 40: 760-764 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2021.08.005.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
93 Van Melkebeke L, Caekebeke P, Duerinckx J. Early results of double mobility trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty: prospective series of 82 Touch prosthesis. Minerva 2022; 73: 241-246

PubMed Google Scholar
94 Duerinckx J, Perelli S, Caekebeke P. Short report letter: Cortical contact is unnecessary to prevent stem subsidence in cementless trapeziometacarpal arthroplasty. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2018; 43: 98-99 DOI: 10.1177/1753193417733377.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
95 Brauns A, Caekebeke P, Duerinckx J. The effect of cup orientation on stability of trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty: a biomechanical cadaver study. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2019; 44: 708-713 DOI: 10.1177/1753193419851775.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
96 Kaszap B, Daecke W, Jung M. Outcome comparison of primary trapeziectomy versus secondary trapeziectomy following failed total trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 863-871 e863 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.01.030.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
97 Knak J, Hansen TB. Trapeziectomy or revision into a cemented polyethylene cup in failed trapeziometacarpal total joint arthroplasty. Journal of plastic surgery and hand surgery 2016; 50: 286-290 DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2016.1162796.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
98 Lenoir H, Erbland A, Lumens D. et al. Trapeziectomy and ligament reconstruction tendon interposition after failed trapeziometacarpal joint replacement. Hand Surg Rehabil 2016; 35: 21-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.hansur.2015.09.002.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
99 Wouters RM, Jobi-Odeneye AO, de la Torre A. et al. A Standard Set for Outcome Measurement in Patients With Hand and Wrist Conditions: Consensus by the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement Hand and Wrist Working Group. J Hand Surg Am 2021; 46: 841-855 e847 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.06.004.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
100 Kapandji A. Clinical test of apposition and counter-apposition of the thumb. Ann Chir Main 1986; 5: 67-73 DOI: 10.1016/s0753-9053(86)80053-9.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
101 Waljee JF, Kim HM, Burns PB. et al. Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 208-220 DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318218fc51.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
102 Stratford P. Assessing Disability and Change on Individual Patients: A Report of a Patient Specific Measure. Physiotherapy Canada 1995; 47: 258-263 DOI: 10.3138/ptc.47.4.258.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
103 Williams GN, Gangel TJ, Arciero RA. et al. Comparison of the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation method and two shoulder rating scales. Outcomes measures after shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27: 214-221 DOI: 10.1177/03635465990270021701.

Crossref PubMed Google Scholar
104 Noback PC, Lombardi JM, Seetharaman M. et al. Development and Validation of a Disease-Specific Questionnaire for Basal Joint Arthritis. J Wrist Surg 2017; 6: 126-133 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593612.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar
105 Mert S, Emelianova I, Mollhoff N. et al. Deutsche Übersetzung und Validierung des patienten-orientierten Fragebogens „Thumb Disability Examination“ (TDX) zur spezifischen Diagnostik und Verlaufskontrolle bei Rhizarthrose. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2023; 55: 443-449 DOI: 10.1055/a-2192-9410.

Article in Thieme Connect PubMed Google Scholar