Endoscopy 2024; 56(10): 749-758
DOI: 10.1055/a-2322-4657
Original article

Comparison of disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy versus direct peroral cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct

Authors

  • Il Sang Shin

    1   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Jong Ho Moon

    1   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Yun Nah Lee

    1   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Hee Kyung Kim

    2   Department of Pathology, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Jun Chul Chung

    3   Department of Surgery, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Tae Hoon Lee

    4   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Jae Kook Yang

    4   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Young Deok Cho

    5   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Sang-Heum Park

    4   Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea (the Republic of)

SoonChunHyang University Research Fund


Graphical Abstract

Preview

Abstract

Background Disposable digital single-operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) and direct peroral cholangioscopy (D-POC) using an ultraslim endoscope are established POC modalities for the diagnosis and treatment of various biliary diseases. We compared the usefulness of D-SOC and D-POC for the diagnosis of intraductal superficial lesions of the bile duct (ISL-Bs).

Methods 38 consecutive patients with suspected biliary diseases who underwent both D-SOC and D-POC were enrolled. The primary outcome was ISL-B detection rate, and the secondary outcomes were technical success of POC and POC-guided forceps biopsy sampling (POC-FB), procedure time, visualization quality, and tissue adequacy.

Results D-SOC had a higher technical success rate than D-POC but the difference was not statistically significant (100% vs. 92.1%, P = 0.25). D-POC had a marginally higher ISL-B detection rate (34.2% vs. 28.9%, P = 0.68) and significantly higher visualization quality (P = 0.03). The mean (SD) procedure time was significantly shorter with D-SOC (11.00 [1.33] vs. 19.03 [2.95] minutes, P<0.001). The technical success rate of POC-FB and tissue adequacy did not differ between the two techniques (D-SOC vs. D-POC: 81.8% vs. 84.6%, P = 0.69 and 77.8% vs. 90.9%, P = 0.57, respectively).

Conclusions Both POC systems were safe and useful for the detection, characterization, and diagnosis of minute ISL-Bs. While D-SOC displayed a shorter procedure time and a tendency for higher technical success rate, D-POC provided superior visualization quality, allowing detailed observation of the surface structure and microvascular patterns.

Supplementary Material



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 17. Januar 2024

Angenommen nach Revision: 08. Mai 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
08. Mai 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
18. Juni 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany