Int J Sports Med 2024; 45(10): 759-766
DOI: 10.1055/a-2332-7408
Training & Testing

Kinematics of Hitting in Youth Baseball: Implications for Skill Development

Nicole Bordelon
1   Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, United States
,
Anthony Fava
1   Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, United States
,
Kenzie B. Friesen
2   Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
,
Ryan L Crotin
3   Exercise and Nutrion Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, United States
,
Gretchen D Oliver
1   Kinesiology, Auburn University, Auburn, United States
› Institutsangaben

Abstract

This study compared lower extremity, trunk, and upper extremity kinematics between tee and front toss hitting in youth baseball athletes. Twenty youth baseball athletes (14.3±2.9 yrs) performed three maximal effort swings off front toss and tee. Kinematic data were collected during the preparatory and acceleration phases. Lower extremity, trunk, and upper extremity kinematics were compared between tee and front toss hitting using 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM). There was a significant difference in trunk kinematics between tee and front toss during the preparatory phase (p=.001); the trunk rotated more toward the back side when hitting off a tee compared to front toss (p<0.001). There was also a significant difference in trunk kinematics between tee and front toss for 67% of the acceleration phase; the trunk rotated more towards the back side from 0 to 67% when hitting off the tee (p<0.001). Significant differences were found in trunk kinematics between tee and front toss hitting in youth baseball players, where the trunk is less rotated toward the pitcher in the tee than in the front toss. Coaches utilize various training modalities to enhance hitting performance; however, differences in trunk kinematics should be considered between modalities when developing fundamental hitting techiques in youth baseball athletes.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 08. Februar 2024

Angenommen: 16. Mai 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
02. Juli 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 DeRenne C. The scientific approach to hitting: Research explores the most difficult skill in sport. University Readers. 2007
  • 2 Escamilla RF, Fleisig G, De Renne C. et al. Effects of bat grip on baseball hitting kinematics. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 203-209
  • 3 Williams CC, Gdovin JR, Wilson SJ. et al. The Effects of Various Weighted Implements on Baseball Swing Kinematics in Collegiate Baseball Players. J Strength Cond Res 2019; 33: 1347-1353
  • 4 Escamilla RF, Fleisig GS, DeRenne C. et al. A comparison of age level on baseball hitting kinematics. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 210-218
  • 5 Gray R. Being selective at the plate: Processing dependence between perceptual variables relates to hitting goals and performance. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2013; 39: 1124-1142
  • 6 Washington JK, Oliver GD. Kinematic differences between hitting off a tee versus front toss in collegiate softball players. Int Biomech 2018; 5: 30-35
  • 7 Chen W-H, Chiu Y-C, Liu C. et al. A biomechanical comparison of different baseball batting training methods. Int J Sports Sci Coach 2022; 17: 599-608
  • 8 Matsuo T, Kasai T. Timing strategy of baseball-batting. J Human Move Stud 1994; 27: 253-269
  • 9 Matsuo T, Kasai K, Asami T. The improvement of coincidence anticipation timing task with bat-swing. J Human Move Stud 1993; 12: 289-295
  • 10 Ae K, Koike S, Fujii N. et al. A comparison of kinetics in the lower limbs between baseball tee and pitched ball batting. Human Move Sci 2018; 61: 126-134
  • 11 Downs J, Friesen K, Anz AW. et al. Effects of a simulated game on pitching kinematics in youth softball pitcher. Int J Sports Med 2020; 41: 189-195
  • 12 Oliver GD, Plummer H, Henning L. et al. Effects of a Simulated Game on Upper Extremity Pitching Mechanics and Muscle Activations Among Various Pitch Types in Youth Baseball Pitchers. J Pediatr Orthop 2019; 39: 387-393
  • 13 Barfield J, Anz AW, Osterman C. et al. The influence of an active glove arm in softball pitching: A biomechanical analysis. Int J Sports Med 2019; 40: 200-208
  • 14 Barfield J, Anz AW, Andrews J. et al. Relationship of glove arm kinematics with established pitching kinematic and kinetic variables among youth baseball pitchers. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6: 1-6
  • 15 Oliver GD, Friesen K, Barfield J. et al. Association of upper extremity pain with softball pitching kinematics and kinetics. Orthop J Sports Med 2019; 7 2325967119865171
  • 16 Oliver GD, Gilmer G, Anz AW. et al. Upper extremity pain and pitching mechanics in NCAA Division I softball. Int J Sports Med 2018; 39: 929-935
  • 17 Bordelon N, Wasserberger KW, Downs Talmage JL. et al. Segment power analysis of collegiate softball hitting. Sports Biomech. 2022: 1-14
  • 18 Wu G, van der Helm FCT, Veeger HEJ. et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion—Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 2005; 38: 981-992
  • 19 Wu G, Siegler S, Allard P. et al. ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for reporting of human joint motion-part I: Ankle, hip, and spine. J Biomech 2002; 35: 543-548
  • 20 Welch CM, Banks SA, Cook FF. et al. Hitting a baseball: A biomechanical description. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995; 22: 193-201
  • 21 Fleisig GS, Hsu WK, Fortenbaugh D. et al. Trunk axial rotation in baseball pitching and batting. Sports Biomech 2013; 12: 324-333
  • 22 Horiuchi G, Nakashima H, Sakurai S. Mechanical energy flow in torso during baseball toss batting. Sports Biomech. 2021 19. 1-11
  • 23 Washington JK, Oliver GD. Relationship of pelvis and torso angular jerk to hand velocity in female softball hitting. J Sports Sci 2019; 38: 46-52
  • 24 Ae K, Burke D, Kawamura T. et al. Optimisation of the upper body motion for production of the bat-head speed in baseball batting. Sports Biomech 2020; 10: 1-15
  • 25 Washington JK, Oliver GD. Relationship of pelvis and torso angular jerk to hand velocity in female softball hitting. J Sports Sci 2020; 38: 46-52
  • 26 Pataky TC, Robinson MA, Vanrenterghem J. Vector field statistical analysis of kinematic and force trajectories. J Biomech 2013; 46: 2394-2401
  • 27 Pataky TC, Vanrenterghem J, Robinson MA. et al. On the validity of statistical parametric mapping for nonuniformly and heterogeneously smooth one-dimensional biomechanical data. J Biomech 2019; 91: 114-123
  • 28 Lamb PF, Pataky TC. The role of pelvis-thorax coupling in controlling within-golf club swing speed. J Sports Sci 2018; 36: 2164-2171
  • 29 Pataky TC. One-dimensional statistical parametric mapping in Python. Comp Meth Biomech Biomed Eng 2021; 15: 295-301
  • 30 Wasserberger KW, Friesen KB, Downs JL. et al. Comparison of pelvis and trunk kinematics between youth and collegiate windmill softball pitchers. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9 23159671211021826
  • 31 Dowling B, Fleisig G. Kinematic comparison of baseball batting off a tee among various competition levels. Sports Biomech 2016; 15: 255-269
  • 32 Lund RJ, Heefner D. Training the baseball hitter: What does research say?. J Phys Educ Rec Dance 2005; 76: 27-33
  • 33 Szymanski DJ, Derenne C, Spaniol FJ. Contributing factors for increased bat swing velocity. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1338-1352
  • 34 Szymanski DJ, Szymanski JM, Bradford TJ. et al. Effect of twelve weeks of medicine ball training on high school baseball players. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 894-901
  • 35 Nakata H, Miura A, Yoshie M. et al. Differences in trunk rotation during baseball batting between skilled players and unskilled novices. J Phys Fit Sports Med 2014; 3: 457-466
  • 36 Fava AW, Giordano KA, Friesen KB. et al. Comparison of trunk and pelvic kinematics in youth baseball pitchers with and without upper extremity pain: A cross-sectional study. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11 23259671221145679
  • 37 Friesen K, Aguinaldo AL, Oliver GD. Athlete body composition influences movement during sporting tasks: An analysis of softball pitchers’ joint angular velocities. Sports Biomech 2022; 1-14
  • 38 Friesen KB, Oliver GD. Softball pitching propulsion and performance differences according to body fat percentage. Int J Sports Med 2022; 43: 895-901