Zahnmedizin up2date, Table of Contents Zahnmedizin up2date 2024; 18(04): 333-351DOI: 10.1055/a-2340-8148 Zahnerhaltung, Prävention und Restauration Non-Prep-Bridges im Seitenzahngebiet – ein neues Anwendungsfeld der konservierenden Zahnheilkunde – Teil 2 Hans Jörg Staehle Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article All articles of this category Bei diesem Beitrag handelt es sich um die Fortsetzung des Beitrags „Non-Prep-Bridges … – Teil 1: Direkte Vorgehensweisen“. Teil 2 informiert über den aktuellen Wissensstand sowie die klinischen Möglichkeiten der indirekten Versorgungsmethoden mit Non-Prep-Bridges (NPBs) und diskutiert die Vor- und Nachteile im Vergleich mit den direkten Methoden. Full Text References Literatur 1 Listl S, Faggion jr. CM, Staehle HJ. Professional variability in decision making in modern dentistry: A pilot study. Oper Dent 2016; 41: 79-87 2 Kern M. Adhäsivbrücken: Minimalinvasiv – ästhetisch – bewährt. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2017 3 Yazigi C, Kern M. Clinical evaluation of zirconia cantilevered single-retainer resin-bonded fixed dental protheses replacing missing canines and posterior teeth. J Dent 2022; 116: 103907 4 Staehle HJ. A new restorative method for the closure of single-tooth gaps – Technique description and case series. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 239-245 5 Staehle HJ. Minimally invasive restorative treatment. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 267-284 6 Staehle HJ, Wohlrab T, Saure D. et al. A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method. J Dent 2015; 43: 1211-1217 7 Staehle HJ, Sekundo C, Hieronymus H. et al. Replacing single missing teeth in the posterior region using direct composite restorations: Survival and clinical quality. J Dent 2021; 113: 103754 8 Staehle HJ. New methods for replacing single missing teeth with non-prep bridges (NPBs) – A case series. J Adhes Dent 2023; 25: 195-210 9 Wolff D, Hahn P, Ding P. et al. Proximal contact tightness between direct-composite additions in the posterior dentition: An in vitro investigation. Oper Dent 2012; 37: 272-280 10 Sekundo C, Staehle H. Mapping the product range of interdental brushes: Sizes, shapes, and forces. Oral Health Prev Dent 2020; 18: 343-354 11 Staehle HJ, Frese C, Sekundo C. Mechanical plaque control in the interdental space with the “Heidelberg-Set”. Quintess Int 2021; 52: 176-186 12 Staehle HJ, Kim T-S, Sekundo C. New options for subgingival oral hygiene with a flattened interdental brush design – In vitro examination and case report. Oral Health Prev Dent 2023; 21: 131-140 13 Brauer HU. Kompositinjektionstechnik – Schritt für Schritt. Zahnmedizin up2date 2022; 16: 395-397 14 Diaz E, Conejo J, Flores J, Blatz MB. Full-mouth Rehabilitation with the flowable Injection Technique. In: Duarte jr. S. Quintessence of dental Technology 2018. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2018: 204-218 15 Terry DA. Restoring with Flowables. Berlin: Quintessenz; 2017 16 Tauböck TT, Schmidlin PR, Attin T. Vertical bite rehabilitation of severely worn dentitions with direct composite restorations: Clinical performance up to 11 year. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 1732 17 Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Gonçalves AP. et al. Repair bond strength of dental composites: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes 2016; 69: 15-26 18 Fouquet V, Lachard F, Abdel-Gawad S. et al. Shear bond strength of a direct resin composite to CAD-CAM composite blocks: Relative contribution of micromechanical and chemical block surface treatment. Materials 2022; 15: 5018 19 Grangeiro MTV, Rossi NR, Barreto LAL. et al. Effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of the hybrid ceramic characterization layer. J Adhes Dent 2021; 23: 429-435
