Eur J Pediatr Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2340-9475
Original Article

Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy with T-Fasteners versus “Pull Technique”: Analysis of Complications

1   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Laura García-Martínez
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Ana Laín
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Carlos Giné
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
María Díaz-Hervás
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Manuel López
1   Department of Pediatric Surgery and Urology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Introduction The T-fasteners gastrostomy (T-PEG) has become increasingly popular over recent years as an alternative to the “pull-technique” gastrostomy (P-PEG). This study aimed to compare P-PEG and T-PEG complications.

Materials and Methods A retrospective observational study of pediatric patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. P-PEG was performed using the standard Ponsky technique and was replaced after 6 months by a balloon gastrostomy under sedation. T-PEG was performed using three percutaneous T-fasteners (that allow a primary insertion of a balloon gastrostomy). The balloon was replaced by a new one after 6 months without sedation. Complications were recorded.

Results In total, 146 patients underwent PEG placement, 70 P-PEG and 76 T-PEG. The mean follow-up was 3.9 years (standard deviation = 9.6). Age, weight, and associated comorbidities were comparable (p > 0.05). The overall complications were 17 (24.2%) in the P-PEG group and 16 (21.0%) in the T-PEG group (p > 0.05). P-PEG was associated with more sedation for button replacement (97 vs. 2.6% [p < 0.05]). P-PEG was associated with more early tube dislodgement during the first replacement (7.2 vs. 1.4% [p = 0.092]). Two of the five dislodged gastrostomies in the P-PEG group underwent laparotomy due to peritonitis, whereas the only dislodged gastrostomy in the T-PEG group was solved endoscopically. Altogether, P-PEG was associated with more complications that required urgent endoscopy, laparotomy, or laparoscopy (18.6 vs. 6.6% [p < 0.05]).

Conclusions P-PEG was associated with more sedation, complications during first button replacement, and complications requiring urgent endoscopy, laparotomy, or laparoscopy compared with T-PEG.



Publication History

Received: 07 October 2023

Accepted: 06 June 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 June 2024

Article published online:
25 June 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Balogh B, Kovács T, Saxena AK. Complications in children with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. World J Pediatr 2019; 15 (01) 12-16
  • 2 Jacob A, Delesalle D, Coopman S. et al. Safety of the one-step percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy button in children. J Pediatr 2015; 166 (06) 1526-1528
  • 3 Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant Jr RJ. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980; 15 (06) 872-875
  • 4 Göthberg G, Björnsson S. One-step insertion of low-profile gastrostomy in pediatric patients vs pull percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: retrospective analysis of outcomes. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2016; 40 (03) 423-430
  • 5 Miller RE, Winkler WP, Kotler DP. The Russell percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: key technical steps. Gastrointest Endosc 1988; 34 (04) 339-342
  • 6 Moreno Montero A, Barceló Cañellas C, Bregante Ucedo JI, García Baglietto A, Marhuenda Irastorza C. [One-step low profile percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: our experience in children]. Cir Pediáatr 2014; 27 (04) 196-200
  • 7 McSweeney ME, Smithers CJ. Advances in pediatric gastrostomy placement. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2016; 26 (01) 169-185
  • 8 Kvello M, Knatten CK, Perminow G. et al. Initial experience with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-fastener fixation in pediatric patients. Endosc Int Open 2018; 6 (02) E179-E185
  • 9 Dahlseng MO, Skari H, Perminow G. et al. Reduced complication rate after implementation of a detailed treatment protocol for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with T-fastener fixation in pediatric patients: a prospective study. J Pediatr Surg 2022; 57 (10) 396-401
  • 10 Conlon SJ, Janik TA, Janik JS, Hendrickson RJ, Landholm AE. Gastrostomy revision: incidence and indications. J Pediatr Surg 2004; 39 (09) 1390-1395
  • 11 Vall d'Hebron University Hospital. Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Pediatric Patients. Unit of Infectious Pathology and Pediatric Immunodeficiencies. Catalan Health Institute; 2022
  • 12 Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML. et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009; 250 (02) 187-196
  • 13 Cyrany J, Rejchrt S, Kopacova M, Bures J. Buried bumper syndrome: a complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22 (02) 618-627
  • 14 Bennell J. Buried bumper syndrome: do we have enough evidence?. Br J Community Nurs 2018; 23 (Sup7): S28-S30
  • 15 Sanogo ML, Cooper K, Johnson TD, Shields J. Removal of T-fasteners immediately after percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement: experience in 488 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018; 211 (05) 1144-1147
  • 16 Aprahamian CJ, Morgan TL, Harmon CM, Georgeson KE, Barnhart DC. U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement: experience with 461 pediatric procedures. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2006; 16 (06) 643-649