Canadian Model of Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in der Rehabilitation – eine Übersicht

Warum sind konkrete Ziele wichtig in der Rehabilitation? Die Ziele in der Rehabilitation unterscheiden sich stark von Patient zu Patient und sind äußerst individuell. Während der eine Patient bereits eine genaue Vorstellung davon hat, was er während der Rehabilitation erreichen möchte, empfindet der andere es als schwierig, klare Ziele zu definieren. Daher ist es entscheidend, die Patienten von Beginn ihrer Rehabilitation dabei zu unterstützen, ihre Ziele zu identifizieren und zu konkretisieren. Als wichtiges Instrument bietet sich das Canadian Model of Occupational Measure an, das die Bereiche Selbstversorgung, Produktivität und Freizeit beleuchtet.

Publication History

Article published online:
27 August 2024

• Literatur

• 1 van Hartingsveldt M, Piskur B. Het Canadian Model of Occupational Performance and Engagement (CMOP-E) en het Canadian Practice Process Framework (CPPF). In: le Granse M, van Hartingsveldt M, Kinébanian A, eds. Grondslagen van de ergotherapie. 5e druk ed. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2017: 341-356 Im Internet: https://www.thecopm.ca/learn/#steps_identify Stand: 17.06.2024
• 2 Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S. et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: A research and clinical literature review. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2004 71. 210-222 DOI: 10.1177/000841740407100406
• 3 Law M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, McColl MA, Polatajko H, Pollock N. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. 5th ed. Ottawa, Canada: CAOT Publications ACE; 2014
• 4 McColl MA, Boyer Denis C, Douglas KL. et al. A clinically significant difference on the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther 2023; 90: 92-102
• 5 Enemark Larsen A, Wehberg S, Christensen JR. The responsiveness of the Danish version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. J Occup Rehabil 2022; 85: 561-569
• 6 van Seben R, Reichardt L, Smorenburg S, Buurman B. Goal-setting instruments in geriatric rehabilitation: A systematic review. The Journal of Frailty & Aging 2017 6. 37-45 DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2016.103
• 7 Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Langeland E. et al. Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults. The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 2016 9. 411-423 DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S113727
• 8 Field DA, Miller WC, Ryan SE. et al. Measuring participation for children and youth with power mobility needs: A systematic review of potential health measurement tools. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2016 97. 462-477 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.428
• 9 Stevens A, Beurskens A, Koke A, van der Weijden T. The use of patient-specific measurement instruments in the process of goal-setting: A systematic review of available instruments and their feasibility. Clinical Rehabilitation 2013 27. 1005-1019 DOI: 10.1177/0269215513490178
• 10 Wagner LV, Davids JR. Assessment tools and classification systems used for upper extremity in children with cerebral palsy. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2012 470. 1257-1271 DOI: 10.1177/0269215513490178
• 11 Kocks JWH, Asije GM, Tsiligianni IG. et al. Functional status measurement in COPD: A review of available methods and their feasibility in primary care. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 2012 470. 1257-1271 DOI: 10.1177/0269215513490178
• 12 de Waal MWM, Haaksma ML, Doornebosch AJ. et al. Systematic review of measurement properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in geriatric rehabilitation. European Geriatric Medicine 2022; 13: 1281-1298 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-022-00692-8.
• 13 Yang SY, Lin CY, Lee YC, Chang JH. The Canadian occupational performance measure for patients with stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Physical Therapy Science 2017 29. 548-555 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.29.548
• 14 Steultjens EMJ, Cup EHC, Zajec J, van Hees S. Ergotherapierichtlijn CVA. 2013. Nijmegen/Utrecht: Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen/Ergotherapie Nederland DOI: 10.1177/000841749406100403
• 15 Broersen S. Shared decision making voor beginners. Medisch Contact 2011. Im Internet: https://www.medischcontact.nl/actueel/laatste-nieuws/artikel/shared-decision-making-voor-beginners Stand: 17.06.2024
• 16 Raven L, Wilschut J, Raven-Takken E. 2022 Kann de COPM afasievriendelijk afgenomen worden? 2022. Im Internet: www.revalidatie.nl/ntr/kan-de-canadian-occupational-performance-measure-copm-afasievriendelijk-afgenomen-worden/ Stand: 17.06.2024
• 17 Verhoef JA, Miedema HS, Meeteren J. et al. A new intervention to improve work participation of young adults with physical disabilities: A feasibility study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology 2013; 55: 722-728
• 18 Verhoef JA, Roebroeck ME, van Schaardenburgh N. et al. Improved occupational performance of young adults with a physical disability after a vocational rehabilitation intervention. J Occup Rehabil 2014; 24: 42-51
• 19 Stukstette M, Hoogeboom T, de Ruiter R. et al. A multidisciplinary and multidimensional intervention for patients with hand osteoarthritis. Clinical Rehabilitation 2012; 26: 99-110 DOI: 10.1177/0269215511417739.
• 20 Steultjens EMJ, Eijssen I, Arts-Tielemans M. et al. Ergotherapierichtlijn Multiple Sclerose. Nijmegen, Amsterdam, Utrecht: Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen, VU medisch centrum, Ergotherapie Nederland; 2017. Im Internet: https://info.ergotherapie.nl/file/download/default/D36E5447471B8476A36930BBDD192098/ET-richtlijn-Multiple-Sclerose-definitief.pdf Stand: 17.06.2024