Download PDF
Hebamme 2024; 37(05): 26-32
DOI: 10.1055/a-2347-8526
CNE Schwerpunkt
Ultraschall

Ultraschall für Hebammen: Ausbildung, Qualitätssicherung und Erfahrungen

Agnes Wittek
,
Ulrich Gembruch
,
Florian Recker
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Sowohl Studien als auch Praxiserfahrungen zeigen, dass Hebammen bildgebende Untersuchungen im Rahmen der Schwangerenbetreuung erfolgreich durchführen können. Erste internationale Bildungseinrichtungen integrieren bereits entsprechende Schulungen in die Hebammenausbildung. Wie diese Ausbildung sinnvoll gestaltet werden kann, welche Inhalte wichtig sind, wie eine Qualitätssicherung erfolgen kann, wie Ultraschall in die Hebammentätigkeit implementiert werden kann und welche Abrechnungskonzepte es gibt, erläutert dieser Artikel.



Publication History

Article published online:
22 October 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Anderson R, Kolko B, Schlenke L. et al. The midwife’s assistant: Designing integrated learning tools to scaffold ultrasound practice. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development. Atlanta Georgia USA: ACM; 2012. 200–210. Im Internet: Stand: 14.08.2024
    CrossrefSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Bentley S, Hexom B, Nelson BP. Evaluation of an obstetric ultrasound curriculum for midwives in Liberia. J Ultrasound Med Off J Am Inst Ultrasound Med 2015; 34: 1563-1568
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Hochschule für Gesundheit. Der Bachelor-Studiengang Hebammenwissenschaft (o.D.). Im Internet: https://www.hs-gesundheit.de/studium/unser-studienangebot/hebammenwissenschaft-bsc/uebersicht-hebammenwissenschaft Stand: 30.09.2024
  • 4 Knapp M. Hebammen Sono (o.D.). Im Internet:. https://hebammen-sono.de/martina-knapp/ Stand: 30.09.2024
  • 5 Groos J, Walter A, Wittek A. et al. Shaping ultrasound in midwifery: Towards an evidence-based training framework for enhanced prenatal care. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2024; 310: 23-43
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Gueneuc A, De Garnier J, Dommergues M. et al. Impact de l’intégration de la simulation en échographie obstétricale dans le cursus des étudiants sages-femmes. Gynécologie Obstétrique Fertil Sénologie 2019; 47: 776-782
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Hall EA, Matilsky D, Zang R. et al. Analysis of an obstetrics point-of-care ultrasound training program for healthcare practitioners in Zanzibar. Tanzania. Ultrasound J 2021; 13: 18
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Johnston BK. Evaluation of point of Care utrasound training for midwives. 2021 Im Internet: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/26969 Stand: 29.08.2024
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Kähler C, Schramm T, Bald R. et al. Updated DEGUM quality requirements for the basic prenatal screening ultrasound examination (DEGUM Level I) between 18 + 0 and 21 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultraschall Med Eur J Ultrasound 2020; 41: 499-503
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kozlowski P, Burkhardt T, Gembruch U. et al. DEGUM, ÖGUM, SGUM and FMF Germany recommendations for the implementation of first-trimester screening, detailed ultrasound, cell-free DNA screening and diagnostic procedures. Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 2019; 40: 176-193
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Le Lous M, Tsatsaris V, Tesnière A. et al. Improving students’ ability to perform a standardized foetal biometry plane using ultrasound simulators. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2017; 46: 439-443
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Matschl J, Gembruch U, Strizek B. et al. Shaping the future of obstetric/gynecological ultrasound training. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2024; 63: 717-722
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Plöger R, Abramian A, Egger EK. et al. Development and feasibility of interdisciplinary objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in obstetrics and gynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2023; 307: 1265-1268
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Recker F, Weber E, Strizek B. et al. Point-of-care ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2021; 303: 871-876
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Recker F, Dugar M, Böckenhoff P. et al. Development and implementation of a comprehensive postgraduate ultrasound curriculum for residents in obstetrics and gynecology: A feasibility study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306: 1045-10451
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Recker F, Schäfer VS, Holzgreve W. et al. Development and implementation of a comprehensive ultrasound curriculum for medical students: The Bonn internship point-of-care-ultrasound curriculum (BI-POCUS). Front Med 2023; 10: 1072326
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Da Silva Costa F. et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: Ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53: 715-723
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Satin AJ. Simulation in Obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: 199-209
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Van der Aa JE, Goverde AJ, Scheele F. Improving the training of the future gynaecologist: Development of a european curriculum in obstetrics and gynaecology (EBCOG-PACT). Facts Views Vis ObGyn 2018; 10: 1-2
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Viner A, Membe-Gadama G, Whyte S. et al. Midwife-led ultrasound scanning to date pregnancy in Malawi: Development of a novel training program. J Midwifery Womens Health 2022; 67: 728-734
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Viner AC, Membe-Gadama G, Whyte S. et al. Training in ultrasound to determine gestational age (TUDA): Evaluation of a novel education package to teach ultrasound-naive midwives basic obstetric ultrasound in Malawi. Front Glob Womens Health 2022; 3: 880615
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 von Kaisenberg C, Chaoui R, Häusler M. et al. Quality requirements for the early fetal ultrasound sssessment at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation (DEGUM Levels II and III). Ultraschall Med Stuttg Ger 2016; 37: 297-302
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar