Download PDF
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2024; 241(08): 917-922
DOI: 10.1055/a-2349-2224
Übersicht

Anterior Segment Complications Following Intravitreal Injection

Vorderabschnittskomplikationen nach intravitrealer Injektion
Lars H. B. Mackenbrock 
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
,
Gerd U. Auffarth 
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
,
Michael Albrecht
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
,
Tadas Naujokaitis 
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
,
Lucy J. Kessler 
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
,
Christian S. Mayer
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
,
Ramin Khoramnia 
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Intravitreal injections (IVI s) have gained increased popularity in the past decades and are used to treat a multitude of ailments. In 2010, the total number of IVI s surpassed the number of cataract surgeries performed, making it the most common procedure in ophthalmology. As the number of injections increases, so does the number of injected-related complications. While complications in the posterior segment, such as retinal detachment or endophthalmitis, are detrimental to visual function and have therefore been well documented, IVI s can also lead to complications in the anterior segment. These include hyphema, inflammation of the sterile anterior segment (incidence rate of 0.05 to 1.1% depending on the drug), implant migration with corneal decompensation (incidence rate of 0.43%), iatrogenic lens damage (incidence rate of 0.07%), accelerated cataract formation (up to 50% for steroids and 10.9% for anti-VEGF), and an increased complication rate during subsequent cataract surgery (up to 4% per IVI). Most of these complications occur immediately and have a good prognosis if treated correctly. However, the increased risk of complications during subsequent surgery demonstrates that IVI s can also have long-term complications, a topic that needs to be explored further in future research projects.

Zusammenfassung

Intravitreale Injektionen (IVI) haben in den letzten Jahrzehnten zunehmend an Beliebtheit gewonnen und werden zur Behandlung einer Vielzahl von Erkrankungen eingesetzt. Im Jahr 2010 hat die Gesamtzahl der IVI s die Anzahl der durchgeführten Kataraktoperationen übertroffen, wodurch sie zum häufigsten Verfahren in der Augenheilkunde wurden. Mit der zunehmenden Anzahl von Injektionen steigt auch die Anzahl der damit verbundenen Komplikationen. Während Komplikationen im hinteren Augenabschnitt, wie die Netzhautablösung oder die Endophthalmitis, katastrophal für die Sehfunktion und heute gut dokumentiert sind, können IVI s auch zu Komplikationen im vorderen Augenabschnitt führen. Dazu gehören Hyphäma, sterile Entzündung des vorderen Augenabschnitts (Inzidenzrate: 0,05% – 1,1% je nach Medikament), Implantatmigration mit Hornhautdekompensation (Inzidenzrate: 0,43%), iatrogene Linsenschäden (Inzidenzrate: 0,07%), beschleunigte Kataraktbildung (bis zu 50% für Steroide und 10,9% für Anti-VEGF) und erhöhte Komplikationsrate während späterer Kataraktoperationen (bis zu 4% pro IVI). Die meisten dieser Komplikationen treten sofort auf und haben eine gute Prognose, wenn sie richtig behandelt werden. Die erhöhte Komplikationsrate während späterer Operationen zeigt jedoch, dass IVI s auch langfristige Komplikationen verursachen können, ein Thema, das in späteren Forschungsprojekten weiter erkundet werden sollte.

Keywords

intravitreal injection - anti-VEGF - cataract - complication - intraocular inflammation - vitreous

Schlüsselwörter

Glaskörper - intravitreale Injektion - Anti-VEGF - Katarakt - Komplikation - intraokulare Entzündungen


Publication History

Received: 29 April 2024

Accepted: 18 June 2024

Article published online:
15 August 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Peyman GA, Lad EM, Moshfeghi DM. Intravitreal injection of therapeutic agents. Retina 2009; 29: 875-912
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Williams GA, Mich R. IVT injections: health policy implications. Rev Ophthalmol 2014; 21: 62-64
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Sampat KM, Garg SJ. Complications of intravitreal injections. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2010; 21: 178-183
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Alkin Z, Perente I, Altan C. et al. Changes in anterior segment morphology after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab and bevacizumab–triamcinolone acetate combination. Eur J Ophthalmol 2013; 23: 504-509
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Güler M, Capkın M, Simşek A. et al. Short-term effects of intravitreal bevacizumab on cornea and anterior chamber. Curr Eye Res 2014; 39: 989-993
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Arslan GD, Guven D, Alkan AA. et al. Short term effects of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents on cornea, anterior chamber, and intraocular pressure. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2019; 38: 344-348
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Güler HA, Örnek N, Örnek K. et al. Effect of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) on corneal endothelium in retinal vein occlusion patients: Corneal endothelium after dexamethasone implant injection. BMC Ophthalmol 2018; 18: 235
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Fine HF, Despotidis GD, Prenner JL. Ocular inflammation associated with antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2015; 26: 184-187
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Pieramici DJ, Avery RL, Castellarin AA. et al. Case of anterior uveitis after intravitreal injection of bevacizumab. Retina 2006; 26: 841-842
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Bodaghi B, Khanani AM, Khoramnia R. et al. Gains in the current understanding of managing neovascular AMD with brolucizumab. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2023; 13: 51
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Khoramnia R, Figueroa MS, Hattenbach LO. et al. Manifestations of intraocular inflammation over time in patients on brolucizumab for neovascular AMD. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2022; 260: 1843-1856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Kessler LJ, Mayer CS, Bagautdinov D. et al. [Bilateral Vasculitis after Single Intravitreal Brolucizumab Injection]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2022; 239: 196-201
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kessler LJ, Mayer CS, Son HS. et al. [Bilateral vasculitis following intravitreal brolucizumab injection]. Ophthalmologe 2022; 119: 93-97
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Fine HF, Roth DB, Shah SP. et al. Frequency and characteristics of intraocular inflammation after aflibercept injection. Retina 2015; 35: 681-686
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Wickremasinghe SS, Michalova K, Gilhotra J. et al. Acute intraocular inflammation after intravitreous injections of bevacizumab for treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 2008; 115: 1911-1915
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Goldberg RA, Shah CP, Wiegand TW. et al. Noninfectious inflammation after intravitreal injection of aflibercept: clinical characteristics and visual outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014; 158: 733-737.e1
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M. et al. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1432-1444
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Rosenfeld PJ, Brown DM, Heier JS. et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1419-1431
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Marticorena J, Romano V, Gómez-Ulla F. Sterile endophthalmitis after intravitreal injections. Mediators Inflamm 2012; 2012: 928123
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Jin T, Zhu J, Wu F. et al. Preparing polymer-based sustained-release systems without exposing proteins to water-oil or water-air interfaces and cross-linking reagents. J Control Release 2008; 128: 50-59
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Sharma MC, Lai WW, Shapiro MJ. Pseudohypopyon following intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection. Cornea 2004; 23: 398-399
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kessler LJ, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R. Functional and Morphological Responses to Fluocinolone Acetonide 0.19 mg in Noninfectious Uveitic Macular Edema Evaluated as the Area-Under-the-Curve. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2023; 39: 449-455
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Khoramnia R, Peto T, Koch F. et al. Safety and effectiveness of the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN): 3-year results from the European IRISS registry study. Br J Ophthalmol 2023; 107: 1502-1508
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Kessler LJ, Łabuz G, Auffarth GU. et al. Biomarkers to Predict the Success of Treatment with the Intravitreal 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Uveitic Macular Edema. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14: 688
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hikal M, Celik N, Auffarth GU. et al. Intravitreal 0.19 mg Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Non-Infectious Uveitis. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 3966
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Augustin AJ, Bopp S, Fechner M. et al. The impact of vitrectomy on outcomes achieved with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant in patients with diabetic macular edema. Eur J Ophthalmol 2021;
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Bodaghi B, Nguyen QD, Jaffe G. et al. Preventing relapse in non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye – evaluating the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN®). J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2020; 10: 32
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Augustin AJ, Bopp S, Fechner M. et al. Three-year results from the Retro-IDEAL study: Real-world data from diabetic macular edema (DME) patients treated with ILUVIEN® (0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant). Eur J Ophthalmol 2020; 30: 382-391
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Weber LF, Marx S, Auffarth GU. et al. Injectable 0.19-mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant for the treatment of non-infectious uveitic macular edema. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect 2019; 9: 3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kang H, Lee MW, Byeon SH. et al. The clinical outcomes of surgical management of anterior chamber migration of a dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex®). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2017; 255: 1819-1825
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ayaz Y, Erkan Pota Ç, Başol İ. et al. Anterior segment complications after dexamethasone implantations: real world data. Int Ophthalmol 2023; 43: 4279-4287
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Celik N, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. et al. Complications of dexamethasone implants: risk factors, prevention, and clinical management. Int J Ophthalmol 2020; 13: 1612-1620
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Stepanov A, Codenotti M, Ramoni A. et al. Anterior chamber migration of dexamethasone intravitreal implant (Ozurdex®) through basal iridectomy (Ando) in a pseudophakic patient. Eur J Ophthalmol 2016; 26: e52-e54
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Rahimy E, Khurana RN. Anterior segment migration of dexamethasone implant: risk factors, complications, and management. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2017; 28: 246-251
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Britz L, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R. [Cataract due to iatrogenic lens trauma during an intravitreal injection-imaging using (intraoperative) optical coherence tomography]. Ophthalmologie 2024; 121: 313-316
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Clemens CR, Alten F, Eter N. et al. [Lens injury as a complication of intravitreal medication injection]. Ophthalmologie 2024; 121: 385-390
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Su J, Zheng LJ, Liu XQ. Iatrogenic crystalline lens injury during intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide: A report of two cases. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7: 3784-3791
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Baskan B, Cıcek A, Gulhan A. et al. Ozurdex completely located inside a crystallized lens – Results of 14 months. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2016; 4: 38-40
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Kurt A, Durukan AH, Küçükevcilioğlu M. Accidental Intralenticular Injection of Ozurdex® for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Intact Posterior Capsule and Resolution of Macular Edema. Case Rep Ophthalmol Med 2019; 2019: 8630504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Berarducci A, Sian IS, Ling R. inadvertent dexamethasone implant injection into the lens body management. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014; 24: 620-622
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Al-Latayfeh MM, Shehada R. Dropped nucleus postintravitreal injection with intact anterior capsule: a case report. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2023; 85: 1177-1179
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Saeed MU, Prasad S. Management of cataract caused by inadvertent capsule penetration during intravitreal injection of ranibizumab. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 1857-1859
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Mackenbrock LHB, Łabuz G, Yildirim TM. et al. Automatic Quantitative Assessment of Lens Opacities Using Two Anterior Segment Imaging Techniques: Correlation with Functional and Surgical Metrics. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12: 2406
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Mackenbrock LHB, Labuz G, Baur ID. et al. Cataract Classification Systems: A Review. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2024; 241: 75-83
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Jun JH, Sohn WJ, Lee Y. et al. Effects of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab) on lens epithelial cells. Clin Ophthalmol 2016; 10: 1167-1174
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 46 Cekiç O, Chang S, Tseng JJ. et al. Cataract progression after intravitreal triamcinolone injection. Am J Ophthalmol 2005; 139: 993-998
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 47 Lee AY, Day AC, Egan C. et al. Previous Intravitreal Therapy Is Associated with Increased Risk of Posterior Capsule Rupture during Cataract Surgery. Ophthalmology 2016; 123: 1252-1256
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Shalchi Z, Okada M, Whiting C. et al. Risk of Posterior Capsule Rupture During Cataract Surgery in Eyes With Previous Intravitreal Injections. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 177: 77-80
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 Bjerager J, van Dijk EHC, Holm LM. et al. Previous intravitreal injection as a risk factor of posterior capsule rupture in cataract surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Ophthalmol 2022; 100: 614-623
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Hård Af Segerstad P. Risk model for intraoperative complication during cataract surgery based on data from 900 000 eyes: previous intravitreal injection is a risk factor. Br J Ophthalmol 2022; 106: 1373-1379
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Miller DC, Christopher KL, Patnaik JL. et al. Posterior Capsule Rupture during Cataract Surgery in Eyes Receiving Intravitreal anti-VEGF Injections. Curr Eye Res 2021; 46: 179-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar