RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000012.xml
Endoscopy 2024; 56(12): v30
DOI: 10.1055/a-2371-5433
DOI: 10.1055/a-2371-5433
Author commentary
Author commentary on Tawfik Khoury et al.
The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, including 5 RCTs and 519 patients, comparing EUS-guided biliary drainage vs. ERCP for primary drainage in inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction. Technical success, clinical success, 1-year stent patency, and adverse events were similar between the two groups, but the reintervention rate was lower in the EUS-guided drainage group. In subgroup analysis, EUS-guided drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent had a higher technical success rate than ERCP.
Qualität:
Publikationsverlauf
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
28. November 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany