Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2381-9050
Original Article

Safety of Skin-to-Skin Contact with Umbilical Venous Catheter in Preterm Infants: A Prospective Study

1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Elena Carrillo-Messa
1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Laura Merayo-Fernandez
1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Inmaculada Cosmo-Garcia
1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Isabel Ramos-Soriano
1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Laura Gonzalez-Garcia
1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
,
Fatima Camba-Longueira
1   Neonatology Unit, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective For many health care providers, an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) may be a contraindication for skin-to-skin contact (SSC). Our aim was to compare the frequency of adverse events between preterm infants who were on SSC with UVC and those who remained in an incubator.

Study Design Prospective observational study in newborns less than 35 weeks gestation. UVC-related adverse events were compared between neonates who performed SSC and those who did not. The incidence of catheter-related displacement, leak, loss, hemorrhage, malfunction, and bloodstream infection was studied.

Results From 226 patients, 171 performed SSC with UVC. Their first contact was earlier than in those who remained in an incubator (SSC-UVC, 29 hours [interquartile range (IQR): 21–53] vs. no SSC-UVC, 132 hours [IQR: 96–188]; p < 0.001). Both groups were similar in gestational age (SSC-UVC, 30 weeks vs. no SSC-UVC, 30.3 weeks; p = 0.331) and birth weight (SSC-UVC, 1,285 g vs. no SSC-UVC, 1,355 g; p = 0.2). Studied complications were not more frequent in patients who performed SSC. In fact, although it was not statistically significant, a lower overall incidence of adverse events (SSC-UVC, 13.5% vs. no SSC-UVC, 20%; p = 0.237) and catheter-related bloodstream infection (SSC-UVC, 4.7% vs. no SSC-UVC, 10.9%; p = 0.111) was observed in this group.

Conclusion SSC with a UVC is a safe procedure and there are no more complications in newborns who perform SSC compared to those who remain in the incubator. Due to its demonstrated benefits, SSC should be promoted in premature newborns regardless of the presence of a UVC.

Key Points

  • SSC in preterm infants with UVCs is safe.

  • Early SSC does not increase UVC-related bloodstream infection.

  • Early SSC should be promoted in stable patients regardless of the presence of a UVC.

Data Availability

All data supporting the findings of this study are not openly available due to privacy and confidentiality reasons but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Data are located in a controlled access data storage in Vall d'Hebron University Hospital.




Publication History

Received: 11 April 2024

Accepted: 06 August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
07 August 2024

Article published online:
26 August 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Gupta N, Deierl A, Hills E, Banerjee J. Systematic review confirmed the benefits of early skin-to-skin contact but highlighted lack of studies on very and extremely preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2021; 110 (08) 2310-2315
  • 2 Conde-Agudelo A, Díaz-Rossello JL. Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2016 (08) CD002771
  • 3 Nunes CRDN, Freitas NF, Arruda JRP. et al. Association between early onset of skin-to-skin contact and mother-infant interaction at hospital discharge and six months of corrected age among preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 2022; 165: 105525
  • 4 Pavlyshyn H, Sarapuk I, Horishna I, Slyva V, Skubenko N. Skin-to-skin contact to support preterm infants and reduce NICU-related stress. Int J Dev Neurosci 2022; 82 (07) 639-645
  • 5 Linnér A, Lode Kolz K, Klemming S. et al. Immediate skin-to-skin contact may have beneficial effects on the cardiorespiratory stabilisation in very preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2022; 111 (08) 1507-1514
  • 6 Lode-Kolz K, Hermansson C, Linnér A. et al. Immediate skin-to-skin contact after birth ensures stable thermoregulation in very preterm infants in high-resource settings. Acta Paediatr 2023; 112 (05) 934-941
  • 7 Forde D, Fang ML, Miaskowski C, Gephart S, Newnam K. A systematic review of the effects of skin-to-skin contact on biomarkers of stress in preterm infants and parents. Adv Neonatal Care 2022; 22 (03) 223-230
  • 8 Kristoffersen L, Bergseng H, Engesland H, Bagstevold A, Aker K, Støen R. Skin-to-skin contact in the delivery room for very preterm infants: a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Paediatr Open 2023; 7 (01) 1-8
  • 9 Blomqvist YT, Ewald U, Gradin M, Nyqvist KH, Rubertsson C. Initiation and extent of skin-to-skin care at two Swedish neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr 2013; 102 (01) 22-28
  • 10 Kenaley KM, Rickolt AL, Vandersteur DA, Ryan JD, Stefano JL. An intervention to decrease time to parents' first hold of infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit requiring respiratory support. J Perinatol 2020; 40 (05) 812-819
  • 11 Nation H, Sanlorenzo L, Lebar K, Brandon D. A quality improvement project to increase frequency of skin-to-skin contact for extreme low-birth-weight infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2021; 35 (03) 247-257
  • 12 Bedetti L, Lugli L, Bertoncelli N. et al. Early skin-to-skin contact in preterm infants: is it safe? An Italian experience. Children (Basel) 2023; 10 (03) 1-10
  • 13 Elboraee MS, Toye J, Ye XY, Shah PS, Aziz K. Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. Association between umbilical catheters and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm infants. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (03) 233-241
  • 14 Shahroor M, Maarouf AM, Yang J, Yankanah R, Shah PS, Mohamed A. Complications associated with low position versus good position umbilical venous catheters in neonates of ≤32 weeks' gestation. Am J Perinatol 2022; 39 (03) 259-264
  • 15 Catherine ZG, Béatrice P, Fabrice L, Claire H, Alain D. Skin-to-skin contact with an umbilical venous catheter: prospective evaluation in a level 3 unit. Eur J Pediatr 2016; 175 (04) 551-555
  • 16 Mutlu M, Aslan Y, Kul S, Yılmaz G. Umbilical venous catheter complications in newborns: a 6-year single-center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29 (17) 2817-2822
  • 17 Linnér A, Lilliesköld S, Jonas W, Skiöld B. Initiation and duration of skin-to-skin contact for extremely and very preterm infants: a register study. Acta Paediatr 2022; 111 (09) 1715-1721
  • 18 O'Grady NP, Alexander M, Burns LA. et al; Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 2011; 52 (09) e162-e193
  • 19 Hess S, Poryo M, Ruckes C. et al. Assessment of an umbilical venous catheter dwell-time of 8-14 days versus 1-7 days in very low birth weight infacts (UVC - You Will See): a pilot single-center, randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev 2023; 179: 105752