Development and Evaluation of the OF Pelvis Score for Osteoporotic Pelvic Ring Fractures – A Retrospective Assessment of Therapy Recommendations for 107 Patients

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to develop a simple and reliable score which supports decision making between non-operative and operative treatment in patients with osteoporotic pelvic fractures.

Methods

Between 2018 to 2020, the OF Pelvis Score was developed during a total of 5 meetings of the Working Group on Osteoporotic Fractures of the Spine Section of the German Society of Orthopaedics and Trauma. The OF Pelvis Score as a decision aid between non-surgical and surgical treatment was developed by expert consensus after analysis of numerous geriatric sacral and pelvic ring fractures from several hospitals. Subsequently, retrospective evaluation of the score was performed on consecutive patients from three hospitals.

Results

The following parameters were considered relevant to decision making between non-surgical and surgical treatment and were incorporated into the score: fracture morphology using the OF Pelvis Classification, pain status, level of mobilisation, fracture-related neurological deficits, health status, and the modifiers already integrated into the OF Pelvis classification. If the score is < 8, non-surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is > 8, surgical therapy is recommended; if the score is 8, there is a relative indication for surgery. The OF Pelvis Score was then evaluated retrospectively in a total of 107 patients, according to records. The OF Pelvis Score was 8 points in 4 patients (3.7%), all of whom received surgical treatment. Of the remaining 103 patients, 93 received score-compliant therapy (90.3%). Among these, 4 of the patients who did not receive score-compliant care refused the recommended surgery, so the actual therapy recommendation was score-compliant in 94.2%.

Conclusion

The OF Pelvis Score can be used to derive a therapy recommendation in many patients in clinical practice. Because of the possible change of clinical parameters during the course of the disease, the score has a dynamic character. In the retrospective evaluation, the recommendations from the OF Pelvis Score were in close accordance with the therapy actually performed.

Keywords

osteoporotic pelvic fractures - classification - non-operative treatment - surgical treatment - decision-making

Publication History

Received: 30 June 2023

Accepted after revision: 07 August 2024

Article published online:
02 October 2024

• Literatur

• 1 Rupp M, Walter N, Pfeifer C. et al. The Incidence of Fractures Among the Adult Population of Germany-an Analysis From 2009 through 2019. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2021; 118: 665-669
• 2 Ullrich BW, Schnake KJ, Spiegl UJA. et al. OF-Pelvis classification of osteoporotic sacral and pelvic ring fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22: 992
• 3 Rommens PM, Hofmann A. Comprehensive classification of fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: Recommendations for surgical treatment. Injury 2013; 44: 1733-1744
• 4 Hotta K, Kobayashi T. Functional treatment strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis in geriatric patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2021; 47: 21-27
• 5 Rommens PM, Boudissa M, Kramer S. et al. Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis is connected with lower mortality. A single institution experience. PloS One 2021; 16: e0253408
• 6 Blattert TR, Schnake KJ, Gonschorek O. et al. Nonsurgical and Surgical Management of Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Global Spine J 2018; 8(2 Suppl.): 50S-55S
• 7 Schnake KJ, Blattert TR, Hahn P. et al. Classification of Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU). Global Spine J 2018; 8(2 Suppl.): 46S-49S
• 8 Audigé L, Bhandari M, Hanson B. et al. A concept for the validation of fracture classifications. J Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 401-406
• 9 Spiegl UJA, Schnake KJ, Osterhoff G. et al. [Imaging of Sacral Stress and Insufficiency Fractures]. Z Orthop Unfall 2019; 157: 144-153
• 10 Timmer RA, Verhage SM, Krijnen P. et al. Indications for surgical fixation of low-energy pelvic ring fractures in elderly: a systematic review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2023; 143: 2417-2428
• 11 Chung HJ, Kim DS, Lee JW. et al. Analyzing the Risk Factors of Mortality after Osteoporotic Hip Fractures Using the National Health Insurance Service Sample Cohort 2.0 Database. Hip Pelvis 2022; 34: 150-160
• 12 Rommens PM, Hopf JC, Arand C. et al. Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48: 3243-3256
• 13 Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel jr EL. ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 1978; 49: 239-243
• 14 Wilson DGG, Kelly J, Rickman M. Operative management of fragility fractures of the pelvis – a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22: 717
• 15 Rommens PM, Hofmann A, Kraemer S. et al. Operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a critical analysis of 140 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48: 2881-2896
• 16 Spiegl UJA, Schnake KJ, Ullrich B. et al. Current Minimally Invasive Surgical Concepts for Sacral Insufficiency Fractures. Z Orthop Unfall 2023; 161: 143-153
• 17 Rommens PM, Hopf JC, Arand C. et al. Prospective assessment of key factors influencing treatment strategy and outcome of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP). Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48: 3243-3256
• 18 Gericke L, Fritz A, Osterhoff G. et al. Percutaneous operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis may not increase the general rate of complications compared to non-operative treatment. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2022; 48: 3729-3735
• 19 Welford P, Jones CS, Davies G. et al. The association between surgical fixation of hip fractures within 24 hours and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone Joint J 2021; 103-B: 1176-1186
• 20 Yagi M, Michikawa T, Hosogane N. et al. The 5-Item Modified Frailty Index Is Predictive of Severe Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019; 44: E1083-E1091
• 21 Subramaniam S, Aalberg JJ, Soriano RP. et al. New 5-Factor Modified Frailty Index Using American College of Surgeons NSQIP Data. J Am Coll Surg 2018; 226: 173-181.e8
• 22 Peichl P, Holzer LA, Maier R. et al. Parathyroid hormone 1–84 accelerates fracture-healing in pubic bones of elderly osteoporotic women. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1583-1587
• 23 Yoo JI, Ha YC, Ryu HJ. et al. Teriparatide treatment in elderly patients with sacral insufficiency fracture. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017; 102: 560-565