Early Improvement in Postoperative Clinical Outcomes without Patellar Resurfacing in Patella-Friendly Design of Medial Pivot TKA

Abstract

There is continued debate about the efficacy and indications for patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), especially with the emergence of patella-friendly designs. This study aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing TKA with or without patellar resurfacing using the same implant design. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent TKA including those with patellar resurfacing (PR group) and those without (NPR group). Demographic data included age, gender, side of surgery, operative time, and body mass index (BMI). Outcomes included preoperative, 2-week, 6-week, and 1-year postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR) values along with knee range of motion (ROM). Postoperative complications were recorded. The power analysis with a large effect size indicated that a minimum sample size of 54 was required for Student's t-test and 34 for the paired t-test. A total of 90 medial pivot (MP) TKA were included in this study. There were 30 knees in the PR group and 60 in the NPR group. There was no significant difference between the groups for all demographic data, preoperative and postoperative ROM, and KOOS, JR values at all time points (p > 0.05 for all variables). The KOOS, JR significantly improved in the NPR groups at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 1 year postoperatively when compared with the preoperative score and at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively in the PR group (p < 0.01). No revisions related to the patellofemoral joint were observed in patients initially undergoing patellar resurfacing. One patient in the NPR group required secondary patellar resurfacing. The patella-friendly MP TKA yielded favorable postoperative outcomes, with or without patellar resurfacing. Improvements in KOOS, JR were observed earlier in the NPR group when compared with the PR group, suggesting that patellar resurfacing may not always be necessary for modern TKA designs.

Level of Evidence Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Keywords

patellar-friendly design - patella - patellar resurfacing - total knee arthroplasty - medial pivot

Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 15. Juli 2024

Angenommen: 22. September 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
24. September 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
06. November 2024

• References

• 1 Barnes CL, Blaha JD, DeBoer D, Stemniski P, Obert R, Carroll M. Assessment of a medial pivot total knee arthroplasty design in a cadaveric knee extension test model. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (08) 1460-1468.e1
• 2 Freeman MAR, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech 2005; 38 (02) 197-208
• 3 Hamai S, Moro-oka TA, Dunbar NJ, Miura H, Iwamoto Y, Banks SA. In vivo healthy knee kinematics during dynamic full flexion. BioMed Res Int 2013; 2013: 717546
• 4 Tanifuji O, Sato T, Kobayashi K. et al. Three-dimensional in vivo motion analysis of normal knees employing transepicondylar axis as an evaluation parameter. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (10) 2301-2308
• 5 Lin Y, Chen X, Li L, Li Z, Zhang Y, Fan P. Comparison of patient satisfaction between medial pivot prostheses and posterior-stabilized prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 2020; 12 (03) 836-842
• 6 Movassaghi K, Patel A, Ghulam-Jelani Z, Levine BR. Modern total knee arthroplasty bearing designs and the role of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arthroplast Today 2023; 21: 101130
• 7 Blaha JD. The rationale for a total knee implant that confers anteroposterior stability throughout range of motion. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (4, Suppl 1): 22-26
• 8 Karachalios T, Komnos G, Hantes M, Varitimidis S. Evaluating the “patella-friendly” concept in total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 15-year follow-up outcome study comparing constant radius, multiradius cruciate-retaining, and nonanatomical cruciate-retaining implants. J Arthroplasty 2021; 36 (08) 2771-2778
• 9 Pavlou G, Meyer C, Leonidou A, As-Sultany M, West R, Tsiridis E. Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: does design matter? A meta-analysis of 7075 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93 (14) 1301-1309
• 10 Wang Z, Zhang YQ, Ding CR, Wang YZ, Xu H. Early patellofemoral function of medial pivot prostheses compared with posterior-stabilized prostheses for unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Surg 2021; 13 (02) 417-425
• 11 Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Annual Report 2021. Hip Knee and Shoulder Arthroplasty. Adelaide, South Australia: AOA; 2021
• 12 Chen K, Dai X, Li L, Chen Z, Cui H, Lv S. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16 (01) 83
• 13 Lyman S, Lee YY, Franklin PD, Li W, Cross MB, Padgett DE. Validation of the KOOS, JR: a short-form Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes Survey. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016; 474 (06) 1461-1471
• 14 Lyman S, Lee YY, McLawhorn AS, Islam W, MacLean CH. What are the minimal and substantial improvements in the HOOS and KOOS and JR versions after total joint replacement?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476 (12) 2432-2441
• 15 Koh IJ, Kim MS, Sohn S, Song KY, Choi NY, In Y. Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a contemporary patella-friendly implant are unaware of any differences due to patellar resurfacing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2019; 27 (04) 1156-1164
• 16 Chen K, Li G, Fu D, Yuan C, Zhang Q, Cai Z. Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Int Orthop 2013; 37 (06) 1075-1083
• 17 He JY, Jiang LS, Dai LY. Is patellar resurfacing superior than nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Knee 2011; 18 (03) 137-144
• 18 Migliorini F, Eschweiler J, Niewiera M, El Mansy Y, Tingart M, Rath B. Better outcomes with patellar resurfacing during primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2019; 139 (10) 1445-1454
• 19 Pilling RWD, Moulder E, Allgar V, Messner J, Sun Z, Mohsen A. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2012; 94 (24) 2270-2278
• 20 Tang X, He Y, Pu S. et al. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of 50 randomized controlled trials. Orthop Surg 2023; 15 (02) 379-399
• 21 Teel AJ, Esposito JG, Lanting BA, Howard JL, Schemitsch EH. Patellar resurfacing in primary total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34 (12) 3124-3132
• 22 Pagenstert G, Seelhoff J, Henninger HB, Wirtz DC, Valderrabano V, Barg A. Lateral patellar facetectomy and medial reefing in patients with lateral facet syndrome after patellar-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29 (11) 2156-2162
• 23 Dong Y, Li T, Zheng Z, Xiang S, Weng X. Adding patella resurfacing after circumpatellar electrocautery did not improve the clinical outcome in bilateral total knee arthroplasty in Chinese population: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2018; 33 (04) 1057-1061
• 24 Ko YI, Yang JH, Choi CH. Comparison of clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing in the same patients. Clin Orthop Surg 2022; 14 (03) 361-369