Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2422-9768
Short-Acting Oral Nifedipine versus Intravenous Labetalol for the Control of Severe Hypertension in the Postpartum Period: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Funding N.A.B.: NIH/NHLBI K23-HL136853; W.A.B.: 5KL2TR001874-08, L30HD103088-01; E.C.M.: NIH/NINDS K23NS107645; S.B. was partially supported by NIH R01NS122449.![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ajp/EFirst/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1055-a-2422-9768_24jul0452-1.jpg)
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of oral short-acting (SA) nifedipine with intravenous (IV) labetalol for the treatment of postpartum (PP) severe hypertension.
Study Design We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who delivered at a tertiary care facility between January and December 2018, had not previously received antihypertensive medication, and required treatment for PP severe hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥ 160 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥110 mm Hg. Exposure groups were defined by the receipt of either oral SA nifedipine or IV labetalol. The primary outcome was time (minutes) to BP control (SBP < 160 mm Hg and DBP <110 mm Hg). Secondary outcomes included number of doses required to achieve BP control, crossover to the alternative medication, and recurrence of severe range BP after the achievement of BP control. t-Tests and Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests were used to analyze continuous variables and chi-square tests or Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze categorical variables. Multivariable linear regression models were conducted for the primary outcome, controlling for potential confounders in a sequential fashion across three models. A Kaplan–Meier plot was also created.
Results Of the 99 women included, 74 received oral SA nifedipine and 25 received IV labetalol. There was no significant difference in minutes to initial BP control between groups (30.5 minutes [interquartile range, IQR: 20.0–45.0] vs. 25.0 minutes [IQR: 14.0–50.0]; p = 0.82) or in the rate of recurrent severe BP. However, patients who received nifedipine required fewer doses to achieve control (p < 0.01) and did not require crossover (0 vs. 12%, p = 0.01).
Conclusion Both oral SA nifedipine and IV labetalol are effective options for treating PP severe hypertension. An initial choice of nifedipine was associated with a lower requirement for subsequent doses of medication and no need for crossover to an alternative antihypertensive medication.
Key Points
-
Nifedipine and labetalol effectively treat PP severe HTN.
-
Nifedipine requires fewer doses to treat PP severe HTN.
-
Both have low recurrence rates of severe HTN.
Note
These findings were presented in poster format at the 41st Annual Pregnancy Meeting, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine in Virtual Format.
Publication History
Received: 23 July 2024
Accepted: 26 September 2024
Article published online:
30 October 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Martin Jr JN, Thigpen BD, Moore RC, Rose CH, Cushman J, May W. Stroke and severe preeclampsia and eclampsia: a paradigm shift focusing on systolic blood pressure. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (02) 246-254
- 2 ACOG Committee Opinion No. 767 summary: emergent therapy for acute-onset, severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133 (02) 409-412
- 3 Khedagi AM, Bello NA. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Cardiol Clin 2021; 39 (01) 77-90
- 4 Walters BN, Thompson ME, Lee A, de Swiet M. Blood pressure in the puerperium. Clin Sci (Lond) 1986; 71 (05) 589-594
- 5 Wilkes RG, Bryson TH, Kent A. Hypertension in the puerperium. Lancet 1987; 2 (8567) 1089
- 6 Abdelwahab W, Frishman W, Landau A. Management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. J Clin Pharmacol 1995; 35 (08) 747-762
- 7 Gales MA. Oral antihypertensives for hypertensive urgencies. Ann Pharmacother 1994; 28 (03) 352-358
- 8 Shekhar S, Sharma C, Thakur S, Verma S. Oral nifedipine or intravenous labetalol for hypertensive emergency in pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 1057-1063
- 9 Vermillion ST, Scardo JA, Newman RB, Chauhan SP. A randomized, double-blind trial of oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol in hypertensive emergencies of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181 (04) 858-861
- 10 Zulfeen M, Tatapudi R, Sowjanya R. IV labetalol and oral nifedipine in acute control of severe hypertension in pregnancy-a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 236: 46-52
- 11 Barton JR, Hiett AK, Conover WB. The use of nifedipine during the postpartum period in patients with severe preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990; 162 (03) 788-792
- 12 Tolcher MC, Fox KA, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Clark SL, Belfort MA. Intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine for acute hypertension in pregnancy: effects on cerebral perfusion pressure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223 (03) 441.e1-441.e8
- 13 Standley CA, Batia L, Yueh G. Magnesium sulfate effectively reduces blood pressure in an animal model of preeclampsia. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19 (03) 171-176