Subscribe to RSS

DOI: 10.1055/a-2434-5177
Interventions to Mitigate EHR and Documentation Burden in Health Professions Trainees: A Scoping Review
Funding D.R.L. receives fellowship support from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Academic Affiliations, Office of Research and Development, and with resources and the use of facilities at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT (CIN-13-407).
Abstract
Background Health professions trainees (trainees) are unique as they learn a chosen field while working within electronic health records (EHRs). Efforts to mitigate EHR burden have been described for the experienced health professional (HP), but less is understood for trainees. EHR or documentation burden (EHR burden) affects trainees, although not all trainees use EHRs, and use may differ for experienced HPs.
Objectives This study aimed to develop a model of how interventions to mitigate EHR burden fit within the trainee EHR workflow: the Trainee EHR Burden Model. (We: 1) Examined trainee experiences of interventions aimed at mitigating EHR burden (scoping review) and (2) Adapted an existing workflow model by mapping included studies (concept clarification).
Methods We conducted a four-database scoping review applying Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extensions for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR) guidance, examining scholarly, peer-reviewed studies that measured trainee experience of interventions to mitigate EHR burden. We conducted a concept clarification categorizing, then mapping studies to workflow model elements. We adapted the model to intervenable points for trainee EHR burden.
Results We identified 11 studies examining interventions to mitigate EHR burden that measured trainee experience. Interventions included curriculum, training, and coaching on the existing EHR for both simulated or live tasks; evaluating scribes' impact; adding devices or technology tailored to rounds; and team communication or data presentation at end-of-shift handoffs. Interventions had varying effects on EHR burden, most commonly measured through surveys, and less commonly, direct observation. Most studies had limited sample sizes and focused on inpatient settings and physician trainees.
Conclusion Few studies measured trainee perspectives of interventions aiming to mitigate EHR burden. Many studies applied quasi-experimental designs and focused on inpatient settings. The Trainee EHR Burden Model, adapted from an existing workflow model, offers a starting place to situate points of intervention in trainee workflow. Further research is needed to design new interventions targeting stages of HP trainee workflow, in a range of clinical settings.
Keywords
electronic health records and systems - documentation burden - EHR burden - clinician documentation - health professions trainees - studentsAuthors' Contributions
D.R.L. conceptualized the project with the advice of D.W. and V.M., as her independent study (2021, V.M.) and capstone (2023–2024, D.W. and V.M.) faculty advisors. The authors (D.R.L., D.W., and A.H.) designed the search strategies. D.R.L. and D.W. independently evaluated the titles and abstracts for inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted by D.R.L. and D.W. in joint sessions, due to the small corpus. All authors contributed to the concept clarification phase. The manuscript was drafted by D.R.L., with detailed feedback from D.W. and V.M. for early drafts and all coauthors for later drafts. The workflow model was adapted by D.R.L. and D.W., which was then reviewed in detail by expert coauthors (C.A.B., E.R.M., S.C.R., and S.T.R.). The complete manuscript (drafts and final version) was reviewed in detail by all the coauthors.
Protection of Human and Animal Subjects
Human and/or animal subjects were not included in the project.
Data Availability Statement
The data underlying this article including the detailed search strategy are available in the article and its online supplementary appendix information.
Disclaimer
The contents of this manuscript represent the view of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
* These authors are co-senior authors.
Publication History
Received: 25 June 2024
Accepted: 30 September 2024
Accepted Manuscript online:
04 October 2024
Article published online:
05 February 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1 Farnan JM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ, Arora VM. Resident uncertainty in clinical decision making and impact on patient care: a qualitative study. Qual Saf Health Care 2008; 17 (02) 122-126
- 2 Paterick ZR, Patel NJ, Paterick TE. Unintended consequences of the electronic medical record on physicians in training and their mentors. Postgrad Med J 2018; 94 (1117) 659-661
- 3 Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M. et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2016; 316 (21) 2214-2236
- 4 Zhou AY, Panagioti M, Esmail A, Agius R, Van Tongeren M, Bower P. Factors associated with burnout and stress in trainee physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3 (08) e2013761
- 5 Sharp M, Burkart KM, Adelman MH. et al; Consensus Expert Panel (CEP) Members. A national survey of burnout and depression among fellows training in pulmonary and critical care medicine: a special report by the Association of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine Program Directors. Chest 2021; 159 (02) 733-742
- 6 Levy DR, Withall JB, Mishuris RG. et al. Defining documentation burden for all health professionals: a scoping review. Appl Clin Inform 2024; (e-pub ahead of print)
- 7 Robertson SL, Robinson MD, Reid A. Electronic health record effects on work-life balance and burnout within the I3 Population Collaborative. J Grad Med Educ 2017; 9 (04) 479-484
- 8 Murthy V. Addressing Health Worker Burnout: The U.S. Surgeon General's Advisory on Building a Thriving Health Workforce, released by the U.S. Surgeon General; 2022
- 9 Sargent MC, Sotile W, Sotile MO, Rubash H, Barrack RL. Quality of life during orthopaedic training and academic practice. Part 1: Orthopaedic surgery residents and faculty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (10) 2395-2405
- 10 Payne TH, Corley S, Cullen TA. et al. Report of the AMIA EHR-2020 Task Force on the status and future direction of EHRs. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; 22 (05) 1102-1110
- 11 Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Strategy on Reducing Regulatory and Administrative Burden Relating to the Use of Health IT and EHRs: FINAL REPORT; As Required by the 21st Century Cures Act. Public Law 114–255, Section 4001. 2020
- 12 Mani K, Canarick J, Ruan E, Liu J, Kitsis E, Jariwala SP. Effect of telemedicine and the COVID-19 pandemic on medical trainees' usage of the electronic health record in the outpatient setting. Appl Clin Inform 2023; 14 (02) 309-320
- 13 Patel A, Mummaneni PV, Zheng J. et al. On-call junior neurosurgery residents spend 9 hours of their on-call shift actively using the electronic health record. Neurosurgery 2023; 92 (04) 870-875
- 14 Holmgren AJ, Lindeman B, Ford EW. Resident physician experience and duration of electronic health record use. Appl Clin Inform 2021; 12 (04) 721-728
- 15 Watson MD, Elhage SA, Green JM, Sachdev G. Surgery residents spend nearly 8 months of their 5-year training on the electronic health record (EHR). J Surg Educ 2020; 77 (06) e237-e244
- 16 Aziz F, Talhelm L, Keefer J, Krawiec C. Vascular surgery residents spend one fifth of their time on electronic health records after duty hours. J Vasc Surg 2019; 69 (05) 1574-1579
- 17 ASTP | ONC. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. Non-federal Acute Care Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption. Health IT Quick-Stat #47. September 2017. Accessed October 10, 2024 at: https://www.healthit.gov/data/quickstats/non-federal-acute-care-hospital-electronic-health-record-adoption
- 18 Kang C, Sarkar IN. Interventions to reduce electronic health record-related burnout: a systematic review. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (01) 10-25
- 19 Moy AJ, Schwartz JM, Chen R. et al. Measurement of clinical documentation burden among physicians and nurses using electronic health records: a scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 998-1008
- 20 Wang Z, West CP, Vaa Stelling BE. et al. Measuring Documentation Burden in Healthcare. Technical Brief No. 47. (Prepared by the Mayo Clinic Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 75Q80120D00005/75Q80123F32005). AHRQ Publication No. 24EHC023. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. May 2024. Accessed October 10, 2024 at: https://doi.org/10.23970/AHRQEPCTB47
- 21 Sloss EA, Abdul S, Aboagyewah MA. et al. Toward alleviating clinician documentation burden: a scoping review of burden reduction efforts. Appl Clin Inform 2024; 15 (03) 446-455
- 22 Chi J, Bentley J, Kugler J, Chen JH. How are medical students using the electronic health record (EHR)?: an analysis of EHR use on an inpatient medicine rotation. PLoS ONE 2019; 14 (08) e0221300
- 23 Bloom MV, Huntington MK. Faculty, resident, and clinic staff's evaluation of the effects of EHR implementation. Fam Med 2010; 42 (08) 562-566
- 24 Fletcher KE, Asan O, Tyszka J. Residents' insights and ideas about screen-sharing in primary care clinics. Appl Clin Inform 2017; 8 (04) 1153-1158
- 25 Duke P, Frankel RM, Reis S. How to integrate the electronic health record and patient-centered communication into the medical visit: a skills-based approach. Teach Learn Med 2013; 25 (04) 358-365
- 26 Wang JK, Ouyang D, Hom J, Chi J, Chen JH. Characterizing electronic health record usage patterns of inpatient medicine residents using event log data. PLoS ONE 2019; 14 (02) e0205379
- 27 O'Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, Brown K, Shiffman RN. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11 (01) 43-49
- 28 Unertl KM, Weinger MB, Johnson KB, Lorenzi NM. Describing and modeling workflow and information flow in chronic disease care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16 (06) 826-836
- 29 Unertl KM, Novak LL, Johnson KB, Lorenzi NM. Traversing the many paths of workflow research: developing a conceptual framework of workflow terminology through a systematic literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 17 (03) 265-273
- 30 AHRQ Publication: Workflow Assessment for Health IT Toolkit.. Accessed August 25, 2024 at: https://digital.ahrq.gov/health-it-tools-and-resources/evaluation-resources/workflow-assessment-health-it-toolkit/workflow
- 31 Please see Appendix 1: Glossary for definition of terms
- 32 Ash JS, Gorman PN, Hersh WR. et al. Perceptions of house officers who use physician order entry. Proc AMIA Symp 1999; 471-475
- 33 Cox ML, Farjat AE, Risoli TJ. et al. Documenting or operating: where is time spent in general surgery residency?. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (06) e97-e106
- 34 Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC. et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth 2020; 18 (10) 2119-2126
- 35 Kramer MK. Concept clarification and critical thinking: integrated processes. J Nurs Educ 1993; 32 (09) 406-414
- 36 Sengstack P, Adrian B, Boyd DL. et al. The Six Domains of Burden: A Conceptual Framework to Address the Burden of Documentation in the Electronic Health Record: Position Paper of the American Nursing Informatics Association Board of Directors. 2020
- 37 Sittig DF, Singh H. A new sociotechnical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19 (Suppl. 03) i68-i74
- 38 Rule A, Melnick ER, Apathy NC. Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 30 (01) 144-154
- 39 Crotty BH, Mostaghimi A, Landon BE. Preparing residents for future practice: report of a curriculum for electronic patient-doctor communication. Postgrad Med J 2013; 89 (1056) 554-559
- 40 Johnson E, Roth E. Improving physician wellness through electronic health record education. Int J Psychiatry Med 2021; 56 (05) 327-333
- 41 Nokes KM, Aponte J, Nickitas DM. et al. Teaching home care electronic documentation skills to undergraduate nursing students. Nurs Educ Perspect 2012; 33 (02) 111-115
- 42 Zoghbi V, Caskey RC, Dumon KR. et al. “How to” videos improve residents performance of essential perioperative electronic medical records and clinical tasks. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (02) 489-496
- 43 Balch H, Gradick C, Kukhareva PV, Wanner N. Association of mobile workstations and rounding-in-flow with resident efficiency: a controlled study at an academic Internal Medicine department. J Gen Intern Med 2022; 37 (14) 3700-3706
- 44 Bernstein JA, Imler DL, Sharek P, Longhurst CA. Improved physician work flow after integrating sign-out notes into the electronic medical record. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2010; 36 (02) 72-78
- 45 Frenzel JE. Using electronic medical records to teach patient-centered care. Am J Pharm Educ 2010; 74 (04) 71
- 46 Lanier C, Dominicé Dao M, Hudelson P, Cerutti B, Junod Perron N. Learning to use electronic health records: can we stay patient-centered? A pre-post intervention study with family medicine residents. BMC Fam Pract 2017; 18 (01) 69
- 47 Lapointe R, Bhesania S, Tanner T, Peruri A, Mehta P. An innovative approach to improve communication and reduce physician stress and burnout in a University Affiliated Residency Program. J Med Syst 2018; 42 (07) 117
- 48 Walsh C, Stetson P. EHR on the move: resident physician perceptions of iPads and the clinical workflow. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2012; 2012: 1422-1430
- 49 Crotty BH, Anselmo M, Clarke D. et al. Open notes in teaching clinics: a multisite survey of residents to identify anticipated attitudes and guidance for programs. J Grad Med Educ 2018; 10 (03) 292-300
- 50 Yuan CM, Little DJ, Marks ES, Watson MA, Raghavan R, Nee R. Nephrology Education Research and Development Consortium—NERDC. The electronic medical record and nephrology fellowship education in the United States: an opinion survey. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2020; 15 (07) 949-956
- 51 Gali HE, Baxter SL, Lander L. et al. Impact of electronic health record implementation on ophthalmology trainee time expenditures. J Acad Ophthalmol 2019; 11 (02) e65-e72
- 52 Wu A, Parris RS, Scarella TM, Tibbles CD, Torous J, Hill KP. What gets resident physicians stressed and how would they prefer to be supported? A best-worst scaling study. Postgrad Med J 2022; 98 (1166) 930-935
- 53 Johnson KB, Neuss MJ, Detmer DE. Electronic health records and clinician burnout: a story of three eras. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021; 28 (05) 967-973
- 54 O'Toole D, Sadik M, Inglis G, Weresch J, Vanstone M. Optimising the educational value of indirect patient care. Med Educ 2022; 56 (12) 1214-1222
- 55 Chen Y, Adler-Milstein J, Sinsky CA. Measuring and maximizing undivided attention in the context of electronic health records. Appl Clin Inform 2022; 13 (04) 774-777
- 56 Ratwani R, Fairbanks T, Savage E. et al. Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1069-1087