PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · AJP Rep 2024; 14(04): e250-e253
DOI: 10.1055/a-2434-5650
Case Report

Hemorrhaging Uterine Fibroid Leading to Emergent Early Term Cesarean Delivery: A Case Report

Nicholas Racchi 
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth-Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Lisa Bird
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth-Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Samantha Mullan
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, TriHealth-Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
William Schnettler
2   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, TriHealth-Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
,
Nanci Billock
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TriHealth-Good Samaritan Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio
› Institutsangaben
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background The incidence of uterine leiomyomas, or fibroids, affecting pregnant individuals is estimated to be 10%, but there are no guidelines or recommendations for fetal or maternal surveillance in pregnancies affected by them. Risks associated with fibroids during pregnancy include potential for pain, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, higher cesarean delivery rate, fetal malpresentation, placenta abruption, and postpartum hemorrhage.

Case Presentation This case describes a 26-year-old gravida 1 para 0 who presented at early term for severe abdominal pain and was found to have acute abdomen accompanied by a nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracing. With emergent cesarean delivery, it was found that the patient was hemorrhaging from a ruptured vessel of a pedunculated fibroid and myomectomy was subsequently performed.

Conclusion While rare, hemorrhage from a uterine fibroid should be considered a part of the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain in pregnant patients with fibroids, particularly when accompanied by concurrent indicators such as free fluid, hypotension/tachycardia, or concerning changes in fetal heart rate, especially in a patient without risk factors for uterine rupture.

Keywords

leiomyoma - hemorrhage - uterine fibroid - cesarean delivery - acute abdomen


Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 31. Juli 2024

Angenommen: 04. August 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
03. Oktober 2024

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
22. Oktober 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Stewart E, Adelman M, Jacoby V. Management of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 228. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 139: e100-e115
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Pavone D, Clemenza S, Sorbi F, Fambrini M, Petraglia F. Epidemiology and risk factors of uterine fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2018; 46: 3-11
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Wise LA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids: from menarche to menopause. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2016; 59 (01) 2-24
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Garg P, Bansal R. Cesarean myomectomy: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2021; 15 (01) 193
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Sobel M, Hobson S, Chan C. Uterine fibroids in pregnancy. CMAJ 2022; 194 (22) E775
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lam SJ, Best S, Kumar S. The impact of fibroid characteristics on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2014; 211 (04) 395.e1-395.e5
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Laughlin SK, Herring AH, Savitz DA. et al. Pregnancy-related fibroid reduction. Fertil Steril 2010; 94 (06) 2421-2423
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Laughlin SK, Baird DD, Savitz DA, Herring AH, Hartmann KE. Prevalence of uterine leiomyomas in the first trimester of pregnancy: an ultrasound-screening study. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (03) 630-635
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Spyropoulou K, Kosmas I, Tsakiridis I. et al. Myomectomy during pregnancy: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 254: 15-24
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Cunningham G, Leveno K, Dashe J, Hoffman B, Spong C, Casey B. eds. Neoplastic disorders. In: Williams Obstetrics. 26th ed.. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 2022
    Suche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Rahimi S. et al. A three-dimensional morphological reconstruction of uterine leiomyoma pseudocapsule vasculature by the Allen-Cahn mathematical model. Biomed Pharmacother 2011; 65 (05) 359-363
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Walocha JA, Litwin JA, Miodoński AJ. Vascular system of intramural leiomyomata revealed by corrosion casting and scanning electron microscopy. Hum Reprod 2003; 18 (05) 1088-1093
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Neiger R, Sonek JD, Croom CS, Ventolini G. Pregnancy-related changes in the size of uterine leiomyomas. J Reprod Med 2006; 51 (09) 671-674
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Tian YC, Wang Q, Wang HM, Wu JH, Dai YM. Change of uterine leiomyoma size during pregnancy and the influencing factors: a cohort study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2022; 157 (03) 677-685
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Vitagliano A, Noventa M, Di Spiezio Sardo A. et al. Uterine fibroid size modifications during pregnancy and puerperium: evidence from the first systematic review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2018; 297 (04) 823-835
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Green J, Biglione A. Fibroid degeneration during pregnancy presenting as appendicitis. Cureus 2024; 16 (04) e57660
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Huang Y, Ming X, Li Z. Feasibility and safety of performing cesarean myomectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (13) 2619-2627
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Goyal M, Dawood AS, Elbohoty SB. et al. Cesarean myomectomy in the last ten years; A true shift from contraindication to indication: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 256: 145-157
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Pergialiotis V, Sinanidis I, Louloudis IE, Vichos T, Perrea DN, Doumouchtsis SK. Perioperative complications of cesarean delivery myomectomy: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (06) 1295-1303
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 Yıldırım Karaca S, Kantarcı S, Adıyeke M. et al. Comparison of transendometrial myomectomy versus conventional myomectomy in cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 267: 68-72
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 21 Tokgöz C, Hatirnaz Ş, Güler O. Pros and cons of myomectomy during cesarean section. In: Androutsopoulos G. ed. Caesarean Section. London: IntechOpen Limited; 2018
    CrossrefSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Sparić R, Andrić L, Guler O. et al. Cesarean myomectomy: reflections on clinical and surgical controversies between a new trans-decidual technique vs. traditional method. Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60 (04) 609
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar