Effect of subtetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on sprint
                    interval exercise

Ryosuke Takeda; Hiroya Nojima; Taichi Nishikawa; Kohei Watanabe

doi:10.1055/a-2450-9051

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Int J Sports Med 2025; 46(02): 121-126
DOI: 10.1055/a-2450-9051

Training & Testing

Effect of subtetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation on sprint interval exercise

Ryosuke Takeda

¹Laboratory of Neuromuscular Biomechanics, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University – Toyota Campus, Toyota, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN70653)

,

Hiroya Nojima

¹Laboratory of Neuromuscular Biomechanics, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University – Toyota Campus, Toyota, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN70653)

,

Taichi Nishikawa

²Graduate School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University, Toyota, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN12745)

,

Kohei Watanabe

¹Laboratory of Neuromuscular Biomechanics, School of Health and Sport Sciences, Chukyo University – Toyota Campus, Toyota, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN70653)

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

The study aimed to determine the acute effects of subtetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with active recovery between sprint exercises on blood lactate accumulation, sprint performance, and muscle fatigue. Sixteen healthy young individuals [23(4) years, 10 males] underwent a 1-min rest followed by sprint interval training consisting of four 15-sec maximal sprint exercises with three 5-min active cycling sessions. Participants engaged in voluntary cycling at 40% of peak oxygen consumption, with or without NMES (VOLES or VOL; interventions). Blood lactate concentration ([La]_b) was assessed at the end of the rest and each intervention periods. Mean power was assessed during each sprint exercise session. Maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the knee extensor was measured before and after sprint interval training to evaluate muscle fatigue. The [La]_b was significantly higher in VOLES than in VOL (main effect, P=0.037). Mean power did not differ between conditions (main effect and interaction, P>0.050). MVC after sprint interval exercise was significantly lower in VOLES than in VOL (interaction, P<0.001). Subtetanic NMES combined with voluntary cycling enhanced blood lactate accumulation and induced greater voluntary fatigue but resulted in similar peripheral muscle fatigue and sprint exercise performance compared with voluntary cycling without NMES.

Keywords

subtetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation - blood lactate accumulation - muscle fatigue - high-intensity exercise

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Jacobs I, Esbjornsson M, Sylven C. et al. Sprint training effects on muscle myoglobin, enzymes, fiber types, and blood lactate. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19: 368-374
2 MacInnis MJ, Gibala MJ. Physiological adaptations to interval training and the role of exercise intensity. J Physiol 2017; 595: 2915-2930
3 Hunt TK, Aslam RS, Beckert S. et al. Aerobically derived lactate stimulates revascularization and tissue repair via redox mechanisms. Antioxid Redox Signal 2007; 9: 1115-1124
4 Sonveaux P, Copetti T, De Saedeleer CJ. et al. Targeting the lactate transporter MCT1 in endothelial cells inhibits lactate-induced HIF-1 activation and tumor angiogenesis. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33418
5 Kitaoka Y, Takeda K, Tamura Y. et al. Lactate administration increases mRNA expression of PGC-1alpha and UCP3 in mouse skeletal muscle. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2016; 41: 695-698
6 Buchheit M, Laursen PB. High-intensity interval training, solutions to the programming puzzle. Part II: anaerobic energy, neuromuscular load and practical applications. Sports Med 2013; 43: 927-954
7 Yamagishi T, Babraj J. Influence of recovery intensity on oxygen demand and repeated sprint performance. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2016; 56: 1103-1112
8 Takeda R, Nojima H, Nishikawa T. et al. Can neuromuscular electrical stimulation enhance the effect of sprint interval training?. Int J Sports Med 2024; 45: 672-677
9 Takeda R, Nojima H, Nishikawa T. et al. Subtetanic neuromuscular electrical stimulation can maintain Wingate test performance but augment blood lactate accumulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 2024; 124: 433-444
10 Bickel CS, Gregory CM, Dean JC. Motor unit recruitment during neuromuscular electrical stimulation: a critical appraisal. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 2399-2407
11 Carpentier A, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Motor unit behaviour and contractile changes during fatigue in the human first dorsal interosseus. J Physiol 2001; 534: 903-912
12 Chou LW, Lee SC, Johnston TE. et al. The effectiveness of progressively increasing stimulation frequency and intensity to maintain paralyzed muscle force during repetitive activation in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 856-864
13 Zierath JR, Hawley JA. Skeletal muscle fiber type: influence on contractile and metabolic properties. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: e348
14 Hirono T, Ikezoe T, Taniguchi M. et al. Relationship between muscle swelling and hypertrophy induced by resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 2022; 36: 359-364
15 Gonzalez AM, Hoffman JR, Townsend JR. et al. Intramuscular anabolic signaling and endocrine response following high volume and high intensity resistance exercise protocols in trained men. Physiol Rep 2015; 3
16 Watanabe K, Yoshimura A, Nojima H. et al. Physiological adaptations following vigorous exercise and moderate exercise with superimposed electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol 2023; 123: 159-168
17 Hirono T, Igawa K, Okudaira M. et al. Time-of-day effects on motor unit firing and muscle contractile properties in humans. J Neurophysiol 2024; 131: 472-479
18 Bar-Or O. The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity. Sports Med 1987; 4: 381-394
19 Watanabe K, Takada T, Kawade S. et al. Effect of exercise intensity on metabolic responses on combined application of electrical stimulation and voluntary exercise. Physiol Rep 2021; 9: e14758
20 Smith KJ, Billaut F. Influence of cerebral and muscle oxygenation on repeated-sprint ability. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109: 989-999
21 Subudhi AW, Dimmen AC, Roach RC. Effects of acute hypoxia on cerebral and muscle oxygenation during incremental exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2007; 103: 177-183
22 Jubeau M, Gondin J, Martin A. et al. Random motor unit activation by electrostimulation. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 901-904
23 Blazevich AJ, Collins DF, Millet GY. et al. Enhancing adaptations to neuromuscular electrical stimulation training interventions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 2021; 49: 244-252
24 Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther 2005; 85: 358-364
25 Scarpulla RC. Nuclear activators and coactivators in mammalian mitochondrial biogenesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 2002; 1576: 1-14
26 Nalbandian M, Radak Z, Takeda M. N-acetyl-L-cysteine prevents lactate-mediated PGC1-alpha expression in C2C12 myotubes. Biology (Basel) 2019; 8: 44
27 Theurel J, Lepers R, Pardon L. et al. Differences in cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular responses between voluntary and stimulated contractions of the quadriceps femoris muscle. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2007; 157: 341-347
28 Carroll TJ, Taylor JL, Gandevia SC. Recovery of central and peripheral neuromuscular fatigue after exercise. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2017; 122: 1068-1076
29 Amann M, Proctor LT, Sebranek JJ. et al. Opioid-mediated muscle afferents inhibit central motor drive and limit peripheral muscle fatigue development in humans. J Physiol 2009; 587: 271-283
30 Amann M. Central and peripheral fatigue: interaction during cycling exercise in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 2039-2045
31 Borzuola R, Nuccio S, Scalia M. et al. Adjustments in the motor unit discharge behavior following neuromuscular electrical stimulation compared to voluntary contractions. Front Physiol 2023; 14: 1212453

Zusatzmaterial

Zusatzmaterial