Download PDF
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base
DOI: 10.1055/a-2461-5608
Original Article

Surgical Anatomy of the Retrosigmoid Approach with Endoscopic-Assisted Reverse Anterior Petrosectomy: Optimizing Meckel's Cave Access from the Posterior Fossa

Alessandro De Bonis
1   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
3   Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
,
Fabio Torregrossa
1   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
4   Neurosurgical Unit, Department of Biomedicine, Neurosciences and Advanced Diagnostics (BiND), University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
,
Danielle D. Dang 
1   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
5   Department of Neurosurgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia, United States
,
Luciano César P. C. Leonel
1   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Pietro Mortini
3   Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
,
Michael Link
1   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
6   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Driscoll Colin
6   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Maria Peris-Celda
1   Mayo Clinic Rhoton Neurosurgery and Otolaryngology Surgical Anatomy Program, SW, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
6   Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was funded by the Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, the Joseph and Barbara Ashkins Endowed Professorship in Surgery and the Radiology Department, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, and the Charles B. and Ann L. Johnson Endowed Professorship in Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives We investigated the extent of access to Meckel's cave (MC) and the middle cranial fossa (MCF) protecting the internal carotid artery (ICA) using the retrosigmoid approach with endoscopic-assisted reverse anterior petrosectomy (EA-RAP).

Methods Five specimens were dissected using the limited and extended EA-RAP. Based on the bone removal of the internal acoustic meatus (IAM) and subarcuate fossa, exposure of the MC and ICA were statistically compared.

Results The limited and extended EA-RAP allowed access to the medial and anterior MC (4 mm posterior to the first genu of the cavernous ICA, and 20 mm posterior to foramen rotundum [FR]). The access to the lateral MC varied with distance of 12 and 8 mm medial to the foramen ovale for the limited and extended EA-RAP, respectively.

In the extended EA-RAP, the exposure of the ICA was gained by drilling with the 0-degree endoscope (3 mm) versus 45-degree endoscope (9 mm). The working distances from the midpoint of the IAM to the most medial point of the exposed ICA was 24 mm. The most lateral point of the exposed ICA varied between 0- and 45-degree endoscopes with a distance of 21 and 13 mm, respectively.

Conclusion A coronal plane from the posterior genu of the cavernous ICA and a sagittal plane to the common crus of the semicircular canals can define the area of MCF accessed by the EA-RAP. Drilling of the temporal bone should be carefully customized according to the patient and can be aided by endoscopic assistance for direct visualization to minimize the risk of injuries to ICA.

Keywords

RAP - EA-RAP - retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach - RISA - Meckel's cave - petrous internal carotid artery - retrosigmoid - reverse anterior petrosectomy - suprameatal tubercle

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Alessandro De Bonis, Maria Peris Celda; Methodology: Alessandro De Bonis, Luciano C. P. C. Leonel, Maria Peris Celda; Formal analysis and investigation: Alessandro De Bonis, Luciano C. P. C. Leonel; Writing—original draft preparation: Alessandro De Bonis, Danielle D. Dang; Writing—review and editing: Alessandro De Bonis, Fabio Torregrossa, Pietro Mortini, Maria Peris Celda; Funding acquisition: Maria Peris Celda; Supervision: Maria Peris Celda.


Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Institutional review board and biospecimens committee approval from the Mayo Clinic was obtained for this study.


Informed Consent

Informed consent for participation and publication in research was not required for this study.




Publication History

Received: 22 October 2024

Accepted: 04 November 2024

Article published online:
03 December 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to Meckel's cave and the middle fossa: surgical technique and outcome. J Neurosurg 2000; 92 (02) 235-241
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Samii M, Tatagiba M, Carvalho GA. Resection of large petroclival meningiomas by the simple retrosigmoid route. J Clin Neurosci 1999; 6 (01) 27-30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Samii M, Alimohamadi M, Gerganov V. Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach for surgical treatment of trigeminal schwannomas. Neurosurgery 2014; 10 (Suppl. 04) 565-575 , discussion 575
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Seoane E, Rhoton Jr AL. Suprameatal extension of the retrosigmoid approach: microsurgical anatomy. Neurosurgery 1999; 44 (03) 553-560
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Xu Y, Hendricks BK, Nunez MA, Mohyeldin A, Fernandez-Miranda JC, Cohen-Gadol AA. Microsurgical anatomy of the endoscopy-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to the Meckel's cave. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21 (02) 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Ebner FH, Koerbel A, Kirschniak A, Roser F, Kaminsky J, Tatagiba M. Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to the middle fossa: anatomical and surgical considerations. Eur J Surg Oncol 2007; 33 (01) 109-113
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Colasanti R, Tailor AR, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Functional petrosectomy via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: guidelines and topography. World Neurosurg 2016; 87: 143-154
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Chang SW, Wu A, Gore P. et al. Quantitative comparison of Kawase's approach versus the retrosigmoid approach: implications for tumors involving both middle and posterior fossae. Neurosurgery 2009; 64 (03) ons44-ons51 , discussion ons51–ons52
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Sharma M, Ambekar S, Guthikonda B, Nanda A. A comparison between the Kawase and extended retrosigmoid approaches (retrosigmoid transtentorial and retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approaches) for accessing the petroclival tumors. A cadaveric study. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2014; 75 (03) 171-176
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Koerbel A, Kirschniak A, Ebner FH, Tatagiba M, Gharabaghi A. The retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach to posterior cavernous sinus: microsurgical anatomy. Eur J Surg Oncol 2009; 35 (04) 368-372
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Chanda A, Nanda A. Retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach: advantages and disadvantages from an anatomical perspective. Neurosurgery 2006; 59 (1, Suppl 1): ONS1-ONS6 , discussion ONS1–ONS6
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Leonel LCP, Carlstrom LP, Graffeo CS. et al. Foundations of advanced neuroanatomy: technical guidelines for specimen preparation, dissection, and 3D-photodocumentation in a surgical anatomy laboratory. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82 (Suppl. 03) e248-e258
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Graffeo CS, Peris-Celda M, Perry A, Carlstrom LP, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Anatomical step-by-step dissection of complex skull base approaches for trainees: surgical anatomy of the retrosigmoid approach. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2021; 82 (03) 321-332
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Arslan M, Deda H, Avci E. et al. Anatomy of Meckel's cave and the trigeminal ganglion: anatomical landmarks for a safer approach to them. Turk Neurosurg 2012; 22 (03) 317-323
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Matsushima K, Komune N, Matsuo S, Kohno M. Microsurgical and endoscopic anatomy for intradural temporal bone drilling and applications of the electromagnetic navigation system: various extensions of the retrosigmoid approach. World Neurosurg 2017; 103: 620-630
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mendez R, Reyna H, Espinoza J, Lopez E, Mendez D. Classification of the suprameatal tubercle and morphometric analysis with surgical approach to the temporal bone. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2020; 81 (01) P004
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Colasanti R, Tailor AR, Lamki T, Zhang J, Ammirati M. Maximizing the petroclival region exposure via a suboccipital retrosigmoid approach: where is the intrapetrous internal carotid artery?. Neurosurgery 2015; 11 (Suppl. 02) 329-336 , discussion 336–337
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Vaz-Guimaraes F, Gardner PA, Fernandez-Miranda JC. Endoscope-assisted retrosigmoid approach for cerebellopontine angle epidermoid tumor. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2018; 79 (Suppl. 05) S409-S410
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Peris-Celda M, Perry A, Carlstrom LP, Graffeo CS, Link MJ. Intraoperative management of an enlarged suprameatal tubercle during microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve, surgical and anatomical description: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2019; 17 (06) E247
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Martinez JL, Damon A, Domingo RA, Valero-Moreno F, Quiñones-Hinojosa A. Retrosigmoid craniectomy and suprameatal drilling-3-dimensionally printed microneurosurgical simulation: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21 (04) E355-E356
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Osawa S, Rhoton Jr AL, Tanriover N, Shimizu S, Fujii K. Microsurgical anatomy and surgical exposure of the petrous segment of the internal carotid artery. Neurosurgery 2008; 63 (4, Suppl 2): 210-238 , discussion 239
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Bouthillier A, van Loveren HR, Keller JT. Segments of the internal carotid artery: a new classification. Neurosurgery 1996; 38 (03) 425-432 , discussion 432–433
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar