Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2464-3717
Artificial Intelligence-based Assessment of Facial Symmetry Aesthetics of Saudi Arabian Population
Funding This work was funded by the Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research at Jouf University (grant number DGSSR-2024-01-01041).data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3eb86/3eb867d5399700c3ede2ee44aa39a138941f700a" alt=""
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate facial symmetry aesthetics (FSA) in the Saudi Arabian population using artificial intelligence (AI).
Two hundred and ten people from a range of demographic backgrounds participated in an observational cross-sectional study that was done at a hospital. Standardized posed photos of the face and smile were taken using a Canon camera utilizing a stratified random sample approach. Webceph software (Korea) with AI was used to evaluate macro, micro, and tiny aesthetic factors. The data were analyzed using paired t-tests, post hoc Bonferroni testing, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and descriptive statistics. The computation of intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) was utilized to assess the dependability of AI evaluations.
All variables had ICCs of more than 0.97, indicating exceptional dependability for the AI-based evaluations. Between the Class I and Class III malocclusion groups, there were significant variations in right mandibular body length (p < 0.001), with Class III patients exhibiting greater values. While no significant changes were identified for other characteristics, paired t-tests showed a significant divergence in mandibular body length between the right and left sides (p = 0.001). In Class III malocclusion, there was a significant preference for right deviation in the direction of mandibular deviation (p = 0.005). These results imply that AI is capable of accurately identifying some anatomical characteristics associated with face aesthetics, especially when it comes to differentiating between Class III malocclusions.
In conclusion, the Saudi Arabian population's facial symmetry assessments via AI have demonstrated a high degree of reliability and consistency. Notably, the length of the mandible on the right side has emerged as a crucial feature in discriminating between malocclusion classes. The study emphasizes how AI might improve the accuracy of assessments of face aesthetics and our knowledge of facial features connected to malocclusion.
Keywords
facial symmetry aesthetics - mandibular deviation - Webceph software - Saudi Arabian population - artificial intelligence - malocclusion - facial aestheticsEthical Approval
This study approved by the Committee of Research Ethics, Deanship of Scientific Research, Qassim University (23-33-03), which complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were followed to design and conduct the study.
Authors' Contributions
M.K.A. and A.A.F. were responsible for conceptualization, methodology, software, validation, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing. M.K.A. was responsible for funding acquisition. Both authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability
The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article. The (Excel raw data) data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
* Both authors contributed equally to this article and are the first authors.
Publication History
Accepted Manuscript online:
11 November 2024
Article published online:
29 November 2024
© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Wei W, Ho ESL, McCay KD, Damaševičius R, Maskeliūnas R, Esposito A. Assessing facial symmetry and attractiveness using augmented reality. Pattern Anal Appl 2022; 25: 635-651
- 2 Ibáñez-Berganza M, Amico A, Loreto V. Subjectivity and complexity of facial attractiveness. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 8364
- 3 Šalkevicius J, Damaševičius R, Maskeliunas R, Laukienė I. Anxiety level recognition for virtual reality therapy system using physiological signals. Electronics (Basel) 2019; 8 (09) 1039
- 4 Lum V, Goonewardene MS, Mian A, Eastwood P. Three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry using dense correspondence, symmetry, and midline analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2020; 158 (01) 134-146
- 5 Matthews H, de Jong G, Maal T, Claes P. Static and motion facial analysis for craniofacial assessment and diagnosing diseases. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci 2022; 5 (01) 19-42
- 6 Khan MF, Sharaz S, Shariff M, Alam MK, Binhomran FM, Almathami SA. Discord between the facial and maxillary midline and intermaxillary midline among the population of asir, Saudi Arabia. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr 2019; 19: e4700
- 7 Karan-Romero M, Salazar-Gamarra RE, Leon-Rios XA. Evaluation of attitudes and perceptions in students about the use of artificial intelligence in dentistry. Dent J 2023; 11 (05) 125
- 8 Roganović J, Radenković M, Miličić B. Responsible use of artificial intelligence in dentistry: survey on dentists' and final-year undergraduates' perspectives. Healthcare 2023; 11: 1480
- 9 Ahmed N, Abbasi MS, Zuberi F. et al. Artificial intelligence techniques: analysis, application, and outcome in dentistry—a systematic review. BioMed Res Int 2021; 2021 (01) 9751564
- 10 Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Maganur PC. et al. Developments, application, and performance of artificial intelligence in dentistry - a systematic review. J Dent Sci 2021; 16 (01) 508-522
- 11 Thurzo A, Urbanová W, Novák B. et al. Where is the artificial intelligence applied in dentistry? Systematic review and literature analysis. Healthcare 2022; 10: 1269
- 12 Li CW, Wang CC, Chou CY, Lin CS. Customized precision facial assessment: an AI-assisted analysis of facial microexpressions for advanced aesthetic treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2020; 8 (03) e2688 Accessed November 15, 2024 at: https://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/2020/03000/customized_precision_facial_assessment__an.45.aspx
- 13 Patcas R, Timofte R, Volokitin A. et al. Facial attractiveness of cleft patients: a direct comparison between artificial-intelligence-based scoring and conventional rater groups. Eur J Orthod 2019; 41 (04) 428-433
- 14 Schwendicke F, Samek W, Krois J. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: chances and challenges. J Dent Res 2020; 99 (07) 769-774
- 15 Kunz F, Stellzig-Eisenhauer A, Zeman F, Boldt J. Artificial intelligence in orthodontics : Evaluation of a fully automated cephalometric analysis using a customized convolutional neural network. J Orofac Orthop 2020; 81 (01) 52-68
- 16 Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Vishwanathaiah S. et al. Scope and performance of artificial intelligence technology in orthodontic diagnosis, treatment planning, and clinical decision-making - a systematic review. J Dent Sci 2021; 16 (01) 482-492
- 17 Chen YW, Stanley K, Att W. Artificial intelligence in dentistry: current applications and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2020; 51 (03) 248-257
- 18 Pisulkar SK, Agrawal R, Belkhode V, Nimonkar S, Borle A, Godbole SR. Perception of buccal corridor space on smile aesthetics among specialty dentist and layperson. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent 2019; 9 (05) 499-504
- 19 Blatz MB, Chiche G, Bahat O, Roblee R, Coachman C, Heymann HO. Evolution of aesthetic dentistry. J Dent Res 2019; 98 (12) 1294-1304
- 20 Ye HQ, Liu YS, Wang GB. et al. Application of three-dimensional digital simulated design and implementation in esthetic rehabilitation [in Chinese]. Zhonghua kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2020; 55 (10) 729-736
- 21 Iliev GV, Romeo G. Harmony of smile design in the facial context. Int J Esthet Dent 2020; 15 (01) 92-106
- 22 Silva BP, Jiménez-Castellanos E, Stanley K, Mahn E, Coachman C, Finkel S. Layperson's perception of axial midline angulation in asymmetric faces. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018; 30 (02) 119-125
- 23 Hidaka T, Tanaka K, Mori H. An artificial intelligence-based cosmesis evaluation for temporomandibular joint reconstruction. Laryngoscope 2023; 133 (04) 841-848
- 24 do Vale Voigt M, Espíndola-Castro LF, de Melo Monteiro GQ, Ortigoza LS, Dos Santos Torreão A, Georg R. DSDapp use for multidisciplinary esthetic planning. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020; 32 (08) 738-746
- 25 Ceylan G, Özel GS, Memişoglu G, Emir F, Şen S. Evaluating the facial esthetic outcomes of digital smile designs generated by artificial intelligence and dental professionals. Appl Sci (Basel) 2023; 13 (15) 9001
- 26 Ajwa N, Binsaeed A, Aloud S, Alanazi R, Mlafakh HB, Alajmi D. A digitalized analysis of incisal changes among orthodontically treated patients: A retrospective comparative study. F1000 Res 2024; 13: 343
- 27 Jones AL, Jaeger B. Biological bases of beauty revisited: The effect of symmetry, averageness, and sexual dimorphism on female facial attractiveness. Symmetry (Basel) 2019; 11 (02) 279
- 28 Cai Z, Hahn AC, Zhang W. et al. No evidence that facial attractiveness, femininity, averageness, or coloration are cues to susceptibility to infectious illnesses in a university sample of young adult women. Evol Hum Behav 2019; 40 (02) 156-159
- 29 Samizadeh S, Wu W. Ideals of facial beauty amongst the Chinese population: results from a large national survey. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2020; 44 (04) 1173-1183