Pitching kinematics have direct and indirect effects on pitch location in NCAA baseball

Abstract

Kinematics and release parameters are important factors of throw location; yet an understanding of their relationship has yet to be achieved. This study sought to explore this relationship. Kinematic data were collected for 77 collegiate pitchers. Fifty-seven kinematic parameters were included in path analyses for horizontal and vertical plate locations. Release angles were set as mediating variables (MED) between independent and dependent variables. Eleven kinematic variables directly (13 indirectly) affected the vertical plate location, while 23 kinematic variables directly affected the horizontal plate location (10 indirectly). Linear mixed models revealed that lateral trunk flexion at ball release (R ²=0.908, BIC=−598, ICC=0.528) best explained vertical plate location. Trunk flexion at foot contact (R ²=0.944, BIC=−607, ICC=0.776), mediolateral center of mass displacement at foot contact (R ²=0.974, BIC=−573, ICC=0.918) and ball release (R ²=0.967, BIC=−593, ICC=0.865), and pelvis rotation at ball release (R ²=0.965, BIC=−588, ICC=0.895) models were identified for the horizontal plate location. Results indicate that the relationship between pitching kinematics, release conditions, and throw location is complex. Biomechanics can influence release parameters, which in turn impacts the throw location. This work may serve to understand better how biomechanics influence performance.

Keywords

accuracy - biomechanics - path analysis - pitching performance

Publication History

Received: 24 August 2024

Accepted after revision: 13 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
13 November 2024

Article published online:
13 January 2025

• References

• 1 Baseball Reference. Major League Baseball Team Statistics https://www.baseball-reference.com/leagues/majors/2022.shtml Accessed September 15, 2023.
• 2 Barrett DD, Burton AW. Throwing patterns used by collegiate baseball players in actual games. Res Q Exerc Sport 2022; 73: 19-27
• 3 Kawamura K, Shinya M, Kobayasi H. et al. Baseball pitching accuracy: An examination of various parameters when evaluating pitch locations. Sports Biomech 2017; 16: 399-410
• 4 Mercier MA, Tremblay M, Daneau C. et al. Individual factors associated with baseball pitching performance: Scoping review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med 2020; 6: e000704
• 5 Freeston J, Ferdinands R, Rooney K. Throwing velocity and accuracy in elite and sub-elite cricket players: A descriptive study. Eur J Sport Sci 2007; 7: 231-237
• 6 Whiteside D, Martini DN, Zernicke RF. et al. Ball speed and release consistency predict pitching success in major league baseball. J Strength Cond Res 2016; 30: 1787-1795
• 7 Manzi JE, Dowling B, Wang Z. et al. Kinematic and kinetic findings in high vs. low consistency professional baseball pitchers. J Orthop 2021; 27: 28-33
• 8 Freeston J, Rooney K. Throwing speed and accuracy in baseball and cricket players. Percept Mot Skills 2014; 118: 637-650
• 9 Glanzer JA, Diffendaffer AZ, Slowik JS. et al. The relationship between variability in baseball pitching kinematics and consistency in pitch location. Sports Biomech 2021; 20: 879-886
• 10 Shinya M, Tsuchiya S, Yamada Y. et al. Pitching form determines probabilistic structure of errors in pitch location. J Sports Sci 2017; 35: 2142-2147
• 11 Hore J, Watts S, Martin J. et al. Timing of finger opening and ball release in fast and accurate overarm throws. Exp Brain Res 1995; 103: 277-286
• 12 Kusafuka A, Kobayashi H, Miki T. et al. Influence of release parameters on pitch location in skilled baseball pitching. Front Sports Act Living 2020; 2: 36
• 13 Nasu D, Kashino M. Impact of each release parameter on pitch location in baseball pitching. J Sports Sci 2021; 39: 1186-1191
• 14 Lozowski B, Atack A, Mahaffey R. Kinematic attributes associated with overarm throwing performance in cricket. Int Soc Biomech Sport 2021; 39: 34
• 15 VanderWeele TJ. Mediation analysis: A practitioner’s guide. Rev Public Health 2016; 37: 17-32
• 16 Harriss D, MacSween A, Atkinson G. Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. Int J Sports Med 2017; 38: 1126-1131
• 17 Jamovi. The Jamovi Project 2022 https://www.jamovi.org Accessed September 15, 2023.
• 18 Gallucci M. jAMM: Jamovi Advanced Mediation Models https://jamovi-amm.github.io Accessed September 15, 2023.
• 19 Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. J Stat Softw 2019; 48: 1-36
• 20 Vrieze SI. Model selection and psychological theory: A discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychol Methods 2012; 17: 228
• 21 MacKinnon DP, Fairchild AJ, Fritz MS. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 2007; 58: 593-614
• 22 Koike S, Ishikawa T, Willmott AP. et al. Direct and indirect effects of joint torque inputs during an induced speed analysis of a swinging motion. J Biomech 2019; 86: 8-16
• 23 Dutton M, Gray J, Prins D. et al. Overhead throwing in cricketers: A biomechanical description and playing level considerations. J Sports Sci 2020; 38: 1096-1104
• 24 Solomito MJ, Garibay EJ, Nissen CW. Sagittal plane trunk tilt is associated with upper extremity joint moments and ball velocity in collegiate baseball pitchers. Orthop J Sports Med 2018; 6: 2325967118800240
• 25 Stodden DF, Fleisig GS, McLean SP. et al. Relationship of biomechanical factors to baseball pitching velocity: Within pitcher variation. J Appl Biomech 2005; 21: 44-56
• 26 Werner SL, Suri M, Guido JA. et al. Relationships between ball velocity and throwing mechanics in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008; 17: 905-908
• 27 Dillman CJ, Fleisig G, Andrews JR. Biomechanics of pitching with emphasis upon shoulder kinematics. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1993; 18: 402-408
• 28 Tocci NX, Howell DR, Sugimoto D. et al. The effect of stride length and lateral pelvic tilt on elbow torque in youth baseball pitchers. J Appl Biomech 2017; 33: 339-346
• 29 Fleisig GS, Barrentine SW, Zheng N. et al. Kinematic and kinetic comparison of baseball pitching among various levels of development. J Biomech 1999; 32: 1371-1375
• 30 Matsuo T, Escamilla RF, Fleisig G. et al. Comparison of kinematic and temporal parameters between different pitch velocity groups. J Appl Biomech 2001; 17: 1-13
• 31 Wight J, Richards J, Hall S. Influence of pelvis rotation styles on baseball pitching mechanics. Sports Biomech 2004; 3: 67-83