Download PDF
Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2475-0244
Original article

Virtual scale endoscope versus snares for accuracy of size measurement of smaller colorectal polyps: a randomized controlled trial

Roupen Djinbachian  ‡
1   Gastroenterology, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN177460)
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
,
Mahsa Taghiakbari‡
1   Gastroenterology, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN177460)
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
,
Abla Alj
3   Internal Medicine, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada
,
Edgard Medawar
1   Gastroenterology, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN177460)
,
Sacha Sidani
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
,
Jeremy Liu Chen Kiow
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
,
Benoit Panzini
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
,
Mickael Bouin
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
,
Daniel von Renteln 
1   Gastroenterology, Centre de recherche du CHUM, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN177460)
2   Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Canada (Ringgold ID: RIN25443)
› Author AffiliationsSupported by: Fujifilm Corporation CER21.305

Clinical Trial: Registration number (trial ID): NCT05236790, Trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), Type of Study: Randomized
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background

Accurate measurement of polyp size during colonoscopy is crucial for informing clinical decisions such as resection technique and surveillance scheduling. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of polyp size measurement when using a virtual scale endoscope (VSE) or snare-based polyp size measurement.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 221 patients undergoing screening, surveillance, or diagnostic outpatient colonoscopies. Study subjects were randomized to have polyps detected during the colonoscopy measured for size either using the VSE or a snare of known size to estimate the size of each polyp. All polyps were measured for reference size directly after their removal from the colon using a digital caliper and before formalin fixation.

Results

93 polyps were included in the VSE group and 102 in the snare group. The VSE demonstrated significantly higher relative accuracy (80.0% [95%CI 77.0%–82.9%]) compared with snare-based size estimation (66.4% [95%CI 62.4%–70.5%]; P < 0.001). Misclassification rates were lower with the VSE for polyps >2 mm (13.1% vs. 39.3%) and >3 mm (22.6% vs. 55.4%). For diminutive polyps, the VSE better prevented misclassification of >5 mm polyps as 1–5 mm (21.4% vs. 73.0%). The VSE also outperformed snare-based estimation in measuring within 10% of the reference standard size (30.1% vs. 18.6%) and had lower rates of size underestimation (36.5% vs. 65.7%).

Conclusions

Using the VSE improves the accuracy of polyp size measurement during colonoscopy in comparison with snare-based size estimation. In clinical scenarios, the VSE reduced misclassifications at clinically relevant size thresholds 2, 3, and 5 mm, which is relevant for the correct choice of polypectomy technique or when implementing resect-and-discard strategies.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 01 June 2024

Accepted after revision: 18 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
18 November 2024

Article published online:
15 January 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 Gupta S, Lieberman D, Anderson JC. et al. Recommendations for follow-up after colonoscopy and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2020; 158: 1131-1153 e1135
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau J-M. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C. et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Kaltenbach T, Anderson JC, Burke CA. et al. Endoscopic removal of colorectal lesions: recommendations by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2020; 115: 435-464
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bhakta D, Patel J, Cifuentes C. et al. ID: 3522605 Are we ready to adopt "diagnose-and-leave" strategy: not so fast. A multicenter international experience. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93: AB102
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 von Renteln D, Kaltenbach T, Rastogi A. et al. Simplifying resect and discard strategies for real-time assessment of diminutive colorectal polyps. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 16: 706-714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N. ASGE Technology Committee. et al. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 81: 502 e501-e502 e516
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Willems P, Djinbachian R, Ditisheim S. et al. Uptake and barriers for implementation of the resect and discard strategy: an international survey. Endosc Int Open 2020; 8: E684-E692
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Anderson BW, Smyrk TC, Anderson KS. et al. Endoscopic overestimation of colorectal polyp size. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: 201-208
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Pham T, Bajaj A, Berberi L. et al. Mis-sizing of adenomatous polyps is common among endoscopists and impacts colorectal cancer screening recommendations. Clin Endosc 2018; 51: 485-490
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Zarandi-Nowroozi M, von Renteln D. Measuring polyp size using a virtual scale endoscope: a video tutorial with clinical case demonstration. Endoscopy 2023; 55: E145-E146
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 von Renteln D, Djinbachian R, Zarandi-Nowroozi M. et al. Measuring size of smaller colorectal polyps using a virtual scale function during endoscopies. Gut 2023; 72: 417-442
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Haumesser C, Zarandi-Nowroozi M, Taghiakbari M. et al. Comparing size measurements of simulated colorectal polyps size and morphology groups when using a virtual scale endoscope or visual size estimation: Blinded randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc 2023; 35: 638-644
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Djinbachian R, Taghiakbari M, Haumesser C. et al. Comparing size measurement of colorectal polyps using a novel virtual scale endoscope, endoscopic ruler or forceps: A preclinical randomized trial. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11: E128-E135
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Renteln Dv, Djinbachian R, Zarandi-Nowroozi M. et al. Measuring size of smaller colorectal polyps using a virtual scale function during endoscopies. Gut 2023; 72: 417-420
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Djinbachian R, Crainic IP, Pioche M. et al. Accuracy in polyp size measurement among surgeons, gastroenterologists, trainees and experts: A prospective video-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119: 532-538
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF. et al. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c869
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Early DS, Lightdale JR, Vargo JJ. et al. Guidelines for sedation and anesthesia in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 327-337
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Masato Y, Yuichi S, Daisuke U. et al. Virtual scale function of gastrointestinal endoscopy for accurate polyp size estimation in real-time: a preliminary study. J Biomed Optics 2021; 26: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Djinbachian R, Abdelhakim K, Noyon B. et al. Accuracy of measuring colorectal polyp size in pathology: a prospective study. Gut 2023; 72: 2015-2018
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Taghiakbari M, Djinbachian R, Haumesser C. et al. Measuring size of colorectal polyps using a virtual scale endoscope or visual assessment: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2024; 119: 1309-1317
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Shimoda R, Akutagawa T, Tomonaga M. et al. Estimating colorectal polyp size with a virtual scale endoscope and visual estimation during colonoscopy: Prospective, preliminary comparison of accuracy. Dig Endosc 2022; 34: 1471-1477
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Houwen B, Hassan C, Coupé VMH. et al. Definition of competence standards for optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 88-99
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Taghiakbari M, Pohl H, Djinbachian R. et al. What size cutoff level should be used to implement optical polyp diagnosis?. Endoscopy 2022; 54: 1182-1190
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Hassan C, Antonelli G, Dumonceau JM. et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline – Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52: 687-700
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Tran T, Sundaram CP, Bahler CD. et al. Correcting the shrinkage effects of formalin fixation and tissue processing for renal tumors: toward standardization of pathological reporting of tumor size. J Cancer 2015; 6: 759-766
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Lam D, Kaneko Y, Scarlett A. et al. The effect of formalin fixation on resection margins in colorectal cancer. Int J Surg Pathol 2019; 27: 700-705
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Turner JK, Wright M, Morgan M. et al. A prospective study of the accuracy and concordance between in-situ and postfixation measurements of colorectal polyp size and their potential impact upon surveillance. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 25: 562-567
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Djinbachian R, Khellaf A, Noyon B. et al. Accuracy of measuring colorectal polyp size in pathology: a prospective study. Gut 2023; 72: 2015-2018
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Jin HY, Leng Q. Use of disposable graduated biopsy forceps improves accuracy of polyp size measurements during endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 623-628
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Hyun YS, Han DS, Bae JH. et al. Graduated injection needles and snares for polypectomy are useful for measuring colorectal polyp size. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 391-394
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Watanabe T, Kume K, Yoshikawa I. et al. Usefulness of a novel calibrated hood to determine indications for colon polypectomy: visual estimation of polyp size is not accurate. Int J Colorectal Dis 2015; 30: 933-938
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Sudarevic B, Sodmann P, Kafetzis I. et al. Artificial intelligence-based polyp size measurement in gastrointestinal endoscopy using the auxiliary waterjet as a reference. Endoscopy 2023; 55: 871-876
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Abdelrahim M, Saiga H, Maeda N. et al. Automated sizing of colorectal polyps using computer vision. Gut 2022; 71: 7-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar