J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2479-4598
Original Article

SUPRAORBITAL AND ENDONASAL APPROACHES: TAILORING SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR TUBERCULUM SELLAE MENINGIOMAS BASED ON PREOPERATIVE GRADING SYSTEMS

Riccardo Antonio Ricciuti
1   Neurosurgery, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18656)
,
Fabrizio Mancini
2   Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18633)
,
Riccardo Paracino
3   neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18633)
,
Matteo Maria Ottaviani
2   Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18633)
,
Pierfrancesco De Domenico
4   Neurosurgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN9372)
,
Francesca Romana Barbieri
5   Neurosurgery, Ospedale di Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18718)
,
Daniele Marruzzo
5   Neurosurgery, Ospedale di Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18718)
,
Serena Pagano
5   Neurosurgery, Ospedale di Belcolle, Viterbo, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18718)
,
Stefano Vecchioni
6   Neurosurgery, Ospedali Riuniti Ancona Umberto I-G.M. Lancisi-G. Salesi, Ancona, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18494)
,
Carlo Conti
2   Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, Perugia, Italy (Ringgold ID: RIN18633)
› Author Affiliations

Background Tuberculum sellae meningiomas (TSM) tend to compress the optic apparatus and an ideal surgical route, whether transcranial or endonasal, is still debated. Another issue is if the minimally invasive supraorbital (SO) approach offers the same results compared to the more invasive craniotomy. Aiming to guide approach selection, preoperative grading systems have been described. Method All cases of TSM treated from 2013 to 2018 by extended endoscopic endonasal (EEA) or SO approach have been reviewed and classified according to three preoperative grading system: McDermott scale, Optic Nerve Laterality Score and Yaşargil criteria. Results A total of 15 patients with TSM were treated with the EEA (n=6) or the SO (n=9) approach. Globally, gross total resection was obtained in 87% (n=13) of cases and was higher with the SO (100%, n=9) compared to the EEA (67%, n=4). Visual function improved in all but one patient (n=14). Compared to the EEA group, patients treated by the SO approach had larger tumors (32.3 mm vs 24.5 mm), higher rate of optic canal invasion (4/9 vs 0/6) and arterial encasement (6/9 vs 1/5). Patients with McDermott total point of 1-2 (7/15) were treated mainly by the EEA; all patients with McDermott total score ≥3 (8/15) were treated by the SO approach. All patients with optic canal invasion (4/15) and lateral extension of the tumor (ONL score = 1-3) were treated by the SO approach. Conclusions The SO and EEA are two minimally invasive approaches safe and effective for treating TSM. For tumors with lateral extension (optic nerve laterality score = 1-3), larger diameter (> 30-35 mm), vascular encasement or optic canal involvement (McDermott total point = 2-3), the SO craniotomy is preferred. For small and median tumors with no optic canal invasion or vascular encasement (McDermott total point = 1-2), the EEA represents a valid option.



Publication History

Received: 03 August 2024

Accepted after revision: 19 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 November 2024

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany