Endoscopy
DOI: 10.1055/a-2479-9227
Innovations and brief communications

Procedural outcomes of a novel underwater injection endoscopic mucosal resection technique for colorectal polyps ≥10 mm (with video)

Yuichiro Hirai
1   Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
Naoya Toyoshima
2   Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Chu-o Ku, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN68380)
,
1   Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
3   Cancer Screening Center, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
1   Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
,
1   Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
4   Division of Molecular Modification and Cancer Biology, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN13543)
,
Nozomu Kobayashi
5   Department of Gastroenterology, Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan (Ringgold ID: RIN13882)
,
Shigeki Sekine
6   Molecular Pathology Division, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan
,
Yutaka Saito
1   Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Supported by: This work was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (2023-A-15).

Background and Aims It is uncertain whether underwater EMR (U-EMR) enables resection of the submucosal tissue with sufficient margins for T1 colorectal cancer (T1-CRC) because U-EMR forgoes submucosal injection. Therefore, we developed a novel ‘underwater injection EMR (UI-EMR)’ method that combines submucosal injection with U-EMR to obtain adequate vertical margin (VM). Patients and methods We retrospectively analyzed procedure-related outcomes of 135 consecutive lesions from patients who underwent UI-EMR for ≥10 mm, non-pedunculated colorectal polyps (median lesion size; 15 mm). The outcomes included en bloc, R0, RX, R1 resection rates and adverse events. Additionally, the VM distance of seven T1-CRCs was evaluated. Results En bloc resection was achieved in 127 lesions (94.1%). R0 and RX resection were observed in 92 (68.2%) and 42 lesions (31.1%), respectively, while R1 resection was seen in only one lesion (0.7%). We identified two lesions (1.5%) with adverse events, which were delayed bleeding. In T1-CRCs, all seven cases had free VMs, and the median VM distance was 1140 µm (range, 731-1570 µm). Conclusions UI-EMR safely demonstrated high success rates for en bloc resection, and potentially ensures sufficient VM. This technique might become an option, particularly for relatively small lesions concerning for T1-CRC and deserve further study.



Publication History

Received: 22 March 2024

Accepted after revision: 20 November 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 November 2024

© . Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany